Gary Gutful
Post Whore
- Messages
- 53,852
Nah mate - Gary made the notesCliff notes?
I’m not opening that, CasperRight, I finally have my laptop in front of me. Attached is a first pass. Probably many more incidents so if you think of any I'll update it.
Haven't done any detailed research yet on each club.
I made the mistake of opening it on my work laptop ... holy shit. How am i gonna explain that to themI’m not opening that, Casper
The same way you explained it last time.I made the mistake of opening it on my work laptop ... holy shit. How am i gonna explain that to them
Right, I finally have my laptop in front of me. Attached is a first pass. Probably many more incidents so if you think of any I'll update it.
Haven't done any detailed research yet on each club.
Give avenger a break, he's just an emotional guyThanks Gronk. Glad some people appreciate my efforts on this forum.
I won’t name names but I think you all know which loser I am talking about, baby.
Right, I finally have my laptop in front of me. Attached is a first pass. Probably many more incidents so if you think of any I'll update it.
Haven't done any detailed research yet on each club.
IMO, the more important aspect is the Club’s response and whether the players in question are still with that club, whether sacked, transferred or didn’t re-sign. In the Roosters’ case, Napa is the only player that remains on their roster and there has been plenty of talk that they were keen to offload him.
This is less so for the sharks but they have still removed Carney, Barba and the 2 x lower grade players from their roster.
The only player we have removed from all of our off field incidents is Junior Paulo and by all reports, we’re welcoming him back with open arms. I will be very interested to see how we handle this latest incident. So far so good.
I reckon swapping urine samples is a sackable offence.Well that's all well and good, but how many of our incidents in the original list would you say are worth the sack?
And how many of our repeat performers match up to, say, Pearce?
Realistically it is a list of varying degrees of minor incident.
I reckon swapping urine samples is a sackable offence.
I’d send them both packingYeah I'd say that's the most major issue.
But I'd be sacking the player avoiding the test, personally.