What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WA BEARS

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
1,467

'Pretty f--king happy!' Bears on brink of return as NRL and WA government come to terms, inaugural coach firming​

By The Roar / Editor
2 hours ago


A Western Australian NRL team is nearing finalisation, after the ARL Commission has accepted a revised offer from the WA government for a Perth-based 18th league franchise.
The deal could mark the return of the Bears to top-flight rugby league for the first time since being culled in 1997.
Reports that negotiations between the two parties had stalled earlier this month, plus the announcement of a new Papua New Guinean franchise in 2028, appeared to have put paid to a WA team.

More League​

But the Australian Rugby League Commission has agreed in principle to a revised proposal from the Western Australia government for an NRL team.
The ARLC have signed off on an increased offer from WA Premier Roger Cook, which has salvaged plans for the Perth Bears concept to enter the competition in 2027.
Bears fans are already celebrating, including club great Billy Moore.

“With my lovely wife, I’ve had a glass of champagne already today, this is the biggest day since 1922 … I’m pretty f–king happy,” Moore told Fox Sports.
“We’ve gone through emotion… the exact nuances aren’t crisp and solid yet but the most important thing that matters to me, my former teammates and the 220-odd thousand fans is that the Bears are back baby, the red and black is there.”
Norths-team-1983-198-1.jpg

A blast from the past: North Sydney’s 1983 team.
The in-principle agreement must also be signed off by the existing 17 clubs and the Rugby League Players’ Association, with those meetings expected to be expedited to give the code extra bargaining power ahead of the next TV rights talks.
Negotiations between the NRL and WA government appeared to have hit a stonewall when Cook accused the league’s governing body of treating his state like a “cash cow”.
Cook had previously said ARL chairman Peter V’landys had been asking the government to provide $120 million in funding over the next decade to help establish the side, and that a team wasn’t a priority.
“Unfortunately, like some people from the east, the NRL only appears to see WA as a potential cash cow,” Mr Cook said.

Western Reds lineup with captain Brad Mackay nearest camera: Winfield Cup Club Rugby League. Photographed on colour transparency by Colin Whelan ý Action Photographics

Western Reds captain Brad Mackay with the foundation team in 1995. (Getty Images)
A bid from a private Western Australian consortium was also rejected by the NRL.
Should all go smoothly, the new franchise could enter the competition as early as 2027.
It’s a major boon for Bears fans, who have been hoping for one home match per season at North Sydney Oval as well as having their team’s famous colours revived by the new club.
The premier revealed earlier this month they were back at the table and described talks as “positive” for the 18th franchise to be located in Perth, and a formal affiliation with former first grade team the North Sydney Bears.
The state government reportedly upped its bid from $35 million to $50 million over five years to get the deal done.
As well as Perth, a Papua New Guinea team is set to enter in 2028, giving the NRL a 19-team competition with 20 sides the league’s long-term ambition with bids from Queensland and New Zealand set to fight it out for the last spot.

The Western Reds only lasted three seasons after they were an expansion team in 1995, sacrificed as part of the Super League War peace treaty.
North Sydney played their last season as a standalone club in 1999 before surviving for two more seasons as part of the ill-fated Northern Eagles joint venture with Manly.
Former Parramatta Eels coach Brad Arthur is firming as the leading candidate to be the WA NRL side’s first head coach when they enter the competition.
“Would I like the Perth job? Of course. I feel I have proven that I can build a club from the ground up, because that’s what we had to do when I started at Parramatta. But this is all premature … But if you’re asking me if I would be interested, then yes, I would be,” he told the Sydney Morning Herald on Thursday.
With over 250 games’ experience as an NRL head coach under his belt, Arthur was dismissed after Parramatta’s poor start to the 2024 campaign.
Across his decade-long tenure, he was unable to secure the club’s first premiership since its heyday of the 1980s but led the Eels to the 2022 grand final where they were soundly beaten by the Penrith Panthers in the second of four straight grand final victories.
But this will be quite a different challenge, with the new club to start from scratch with potentially less than two years to prepare for Round 1 of the 2027 season.
 

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
1,467

Red&BlackBear

First Grade
Messages
5,700

Clubs getting $500k each off the bat.


Clubs offered $500k sweetener to get Perth NRL team over the line
Zoe Samios and Tom Rabe
Apr 24, 2025 – 7.10pm

Save

Share


Gift this article



Listen to this article
5 min
Western Australia has edged closer to securing its first NRL team after the code’s governing body agreed to a revised bid from Premier Roger Cook that the government described as its final offer.
The NRL’s 17 clubs met on Thursday afternoon to discuss the potential arrival of the new team, to be known as the Perth Bears, from 2027, in a deal that sources said could deliver them an extra $500,000 each.

Negotiations to revive the North Sydney Bears via an NRL team in Western Australia have been long and tumultuous. Steven Siewert
Any agreement for a new NRL team requires consultation with the existing 17 clubs and the Rugby League Players’ Association before the governing body can go back to the WA government with its position.
Sources with direct knowledge of the meeting, not authorised to speak publicly, told The Australian Financial Review there was broad support for the proposal from a commercial perspective.
However, the clubs are frustrated by the lack of consultation on the revised bid before it was leaked to media outlets. Consultation is a requirement of club licence agreements signed with the NRL last October.
The sources said the clubs were each expected to receive a $500,000 distribution from the NRL in 2027 and had been told the arrival of a Perth team would result in a bigger broadcast deal.
The clubs would also receive a one-off $500,000 for commercial outperformance of the competition in 2027. They had yet to receive the specific financial details of WA’s revised bid.
Clubs are also concerned about the implications of the NRL owning the Perth team for its first five years. They are expected to communicate their views to the NRL in the coming days.
The WA government confirmed it had put “a revised and final” offer to the Australian Rugby League Commission.
“While we have taken a strong negotiating position, these discussions have been positive and respectful,” a statement said.
“Throughout the negotiations, the WA government has been adamant that the Perth club should not be forced to pay a licence fee to participate in the NRL. The WA government also wants a guarantee that any future financial assistance to the Bears to be spent in WA.”
Long negotiations
Cook said on Thursday that talks with the NRL “are positive”.
“We look forward to those discussions continuing,” Cook said.
People within the WA government, who requested anonymity to speak freely, said they were optimistic a deal would be reached with the league, but noted questions remained about timing and how the team would operate.
Negotiations for an NRL team from the west have been long and tumultuous. The NRL originally negotiated with a private consortium but entered talks with the WA government after an initial bid was rejected for reasons including the absence of an offer for a licence fee.
WA paying a licence fee is not part of the revised bid.
Cook, who played both codes of rugby in his youth, has been an advocate for securing an NRL team for WA but said in February rugby league was a relative minnow west of the Nullarbor compared to other sports and his government would not bend over backwards for a deal.
Under a previous proposal, the WA government was willing to commit to a centre of excellence and to contribute $35 million to grassroots.
The government and the NRL have been back and forth since then, negotiating over a range of conditions, including a multimillion-dollar commitment to join the NRL premiership, investment in grassroots and an upgrade of HBF Park to give the NRL a state-of-the-art, CommBank Stadium-style facility in Perth.
Plans looked all but over until early this month when Australian Rugby League Commission chairman Peter V’landys said there was still a chance a deal could be made.
“I have always said the business case has to stack up and if it doesn’t stack up, I can’t take it forward,” V’landys said.
“I’m not trying to be disrespectful to them. I am just trying to validate a business that I can take to the clubs.”
Establishing a new WA team is a part of the NRL’s plan to grow its competition to 20 teams by 2030 and secure a record broadcast deal to fund the sport after the existing agreement expires in 2027.
The time difference between Perth and the east coast would bring scheduling flexibility and more games to the competition that could be valuable to potential partners. It could also generate sponsorship money from sectors that thrive in the region.
A WA team would mark a return to the NRL for the North Sydney Bears, who were relegated more than 25 years ago. It is expected to enter the competition before a new Papua New Guinea team, which is slated to play its first season in 2028.
In the years before the NRL, Perth was home to the Western Reds in Australian Rugby League competition from 1992. The club switched to the Super League competition in 1997 as the Perth Reds.
But WA lost its spot in the top tier of rugby when the ARL and Super League merged as the NRL.

Thanks for posting link mate, I was going to drop some more details tomorrow but this article beat me on a couple items.

But yes, clubs endorsed it. RLPA endorsed it. Clubs get an initial $500k one off payment. Then as I mentioned earlier today will get an even spread % share of some of the clubs sale money (whenever that happens). They will get increased funding from new broadcast deal in relation to adding this extra game + new time slot associated with it.

They mentioned the official name as Perth Bears here and while that’s 97.5% locked in - I have to stress that it’s not a complete sure thing yet and it might still be something different like WA Bears etc
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,479
That article mentions the NRL owning Perth for the first 5 years. Supports my total guess of a theory that they will transition from co-owning Perth to co-owning a South Island team for team 20 in 2032-2033, assuming none of the NZ bids are up to standard by then.
Interesting scenario if they replicate the Perth model of "NRL ownership, then sale" for NZ 2.

It does raise the issue of branding though - in Perth's case, the Bears has beenthe desired brand for some time as it rights two wrongs.. but in NZ2's case, there's wider scope.

Does the NRL buy the brand from one of the rejected bids to set up an initially NRL owned club? (And do they get first option to put an offer in to buy it later?).. or does the NRL come up with a new brand that's not any of the NZ2 bids?
 

Steel Saints

Juniors
Messages
1,134
Spitballing possible expansion after 2028. We seem to know teams 18 and 19.

Perth- 2027 (18)
PNG- 2028 (19) first year of tv rights cycle. Bring in a team every five years to coincide the beginning of a tv deal.

Christchurch -2033 (20)
Ipswich- 2038 (21)
Adelaide- 2043 (22) long shot, but it would mean every mainland capital has a team.

We did have 22 teams in 1997. Twelve at ARL, ten at Super League.
 

i0Nic

Juniors
Messages
485
Spitballing possible expansion after 2028. We seem to know teams 18 and 19.

Perth- 2027 (18)
PNG- 2028 (19) first year of tv rights cycle. Bring in a team every five years to coincide the beginning of a tv deal.

Christchurch -2033 (20)
Ipswich- 2038 (21)
Adelaide- 2043 (22) long shot, but it would mean every mainland capital has a team.

We did have 22 teams in 1997. Twelve at ARL, ten at Super League.
Agree with this but I’d bring in Ipswich at the same time as Christchurch and Adelaide earlier in 2038 to have a 22 team comp
 

titoelcolombiano

First Grade
Messages
6,885
Interesting scenario if they replicate the Perth model of "NRL ownership, then sale" for NZ 2.

It does raise the issue of branding though - in Perth's case, the Bears has beenthe desired brand for some time as it rights two wrongs.. but in NZ2's case, there's wider scope.

Does the NRL buy the brand from one of the rejected bids to set up an initially NRL owned club? (And do they get first option to put an offer in to buy it later?).. or does the NRL come up with a new brand that's not any of the NZ2 bids?
You can have Firehawks for free if you like
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
39,456
Spitballing possible expansion after 2028. We seem to know teams 18 and 19.

Perth- 2027 (18)
PNG- 2028 (19) first year of tv rights cycle. Bring in a team every five years to coincide the beginning of a tv deal.

Christchurch -2033 (20)
Ipswich- 2038 (21)
Adelaide- 2043 (22) long shot, but it would mean every mainland capital has a team.

We did have 22 teams in 1997. Twelve at ARL, ten at Super League.
Then Fiji and either Wellington or Hawaii for 24 teams
 
Top