hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 156,063
Clearing a path for Fafita??
Clearing a path for Fafita??
We have ex Tigers controlling our recruitment, what could go wrong?Is MON already on the shit list?
You could go back?I lived there for most of the past 13 f**ken years and never got to watch an Eels game. Now they get an NRL team. Such merkins.
Well, it the price is irrelevant, that makes perfect sense. But the price here is potentially considerable. I'm not worried his ability in offense or defense.....he's great. It's what is going on between the ears that concerns me. If it was only for the current year it would be a no brainer, as there would really be no significant downside.Any player might not work out. Better to take a risk on one of the best in the game. His whole career has been good defensively (over 90% tackle efficiency his whole career) , at the very least we get a good defender.
We’d rip right in. Probably for years to come. That reminds me, f**ken WhatmoughWell, it the price is irrelevant, that makes perfect sense. But the price here is potentially considerable. I'm not worried his ability in offense or defense.....he's great. It's what is going on between the ears that concerns me. If it was only for the current year it would be a no brainer, as there would really be no significant downside.
Put it another way. Let's say that we roll the dice and sign him with the GC paying a small proportion of his v. large salary. He plays well for 6 weeks and then he cracks the shits and spends a lot of time not playing NRL (or playing it in a disinterested fashion). Would you absolve the club's management of responsibility for signing him? Or rip right into them?
It's a good thing we didn't sign Anthony Watts (Whatmough's half-name sake).We’d rip right in. Probably for years to come. That reminds me, f**ken Whatmough
Well, it the price is irrelevant, that makes perfect sense. But the price here is potentially considerable. I'm not worried his ability in offense or defense.....he's great. It's what is going on between the ears that concerns me. If it was only for the current year it would be a no brainer, as there would really be no significant downside.
Put it another way. Let's say that we roll the dice and sign him with the GC paying a small proportion of his v. large salary. He plays well for 6 weeks and then he cracks the shits and spends a lot of time not playing NRL (or playing it in a disinterested fashion). Would you absolve the club's management of responsibility for signing him? Or rip right into them?
Or true leadership steps up early and makes the hard call to support the longer term objective of building a solid base from the ground up and doesn't jump at the next best shiny toy for a quick fix alone.Great points.
I know that it wasn't directed at me, but allow me to respond, using my other beloved sports team, the Las Vegas Raiders, to illustrate my point.
Back in the early 00's, the Raiders were loving high - making the Playoffs regularly, and even playing in a Super Bowl in 2003. The world was our oyster.
A series of utterly pathetic decisions over the ensuing decade (letting Charles Woodson, Nnamdi Asomugha, Randy Moss, etc. go, and replacing them with bums; inexplicably targeting positions in the draft that we did not need, and not for trade fodder) meant that the Raiders were now having to take huge risks to upgrade the roster.
Looking at the 2025 Raiders roster, they featured exactly 2 players that you'd feed - Max Crosby, and Davante Adams. The rest of the team is utter garbage.
Sure, there are young players with potential - but unless you're willing to invest 3 years of your time in developing them, it's a gamble.
I suppose what I am rather ineloquently trying to say is that a team that has reached rock bottom needs to take risks - the Raiders did it with the drafting of JaMarcus Russell (total waste of a draft pick), and Clelin Ferrell (showed promise, but was not a first-rounder for a competent organisation).
When the risks don't pan out, it's a shame, but "safe" and "sensible" will likely work out in the long run - a luxury that coaches, and their staff, don't generally enjoy, because their jobs are short-term, and success is needed quickly.
If we hypothetically sign David Fifita, and he has a hissy fit of sorts, that's when true leadership steps forward to save the day...orz at least, that is what one would expect.
We must be signing someone before the cut off for this season. Or are we writing the year off?
Great points.
I know that it wasn't directed at me, but allow me to respond, using my other beloved sports team, the Las Vegas Raiders, to illustrate my point.
Back in the early 00's, the Raiders were loving high - making the Playoffs regularly, and even playing in a Super Bowl in 2003. The world was our oyster.
A series of utterly pathetic decisions over the ensuing decade (letting Charles Woodson, Nnamdi Asomugha, Randy Moss, etc. go, and replacing them with bums; inexplicably targeting positions in the draft that we did not need, and not for trade fodder) meant that the Raiders were now having to take huge risks to upgrade the roster.
Looking at the 2025 Raiders roster, they featured exactly 2 players that you'd feed - Max Crosby, and Davante Adams. The rest of the team is utter garbage.
Sure, there are young players with potential - but unless you're willing to invest 3 years of your time in developing them, it's a gamble.
I suppose what I am rather ineloquently trying to say is that a team that has reached rock bottom needs to take risks - the Raiders did it with the drafting of JaMarcus Russell (total waste of a draft pick), and Clelin Ferrell (showed promise, but was not a first-rounder for a competent organisation).
When the risks don't pan out, it's a shame, but "safe" and "sensible" will likely work out in the long run - a luxury that coaches, and their staff, don't generally enjoy, because their jobs are short-term, and success is needed quickly.
If we hypothetically sign David Fifita, and he has a hissy fit of sorts, that's when true leadership steps forward to save the day...orz at least, that is what one would expect.
I’d back the clubs leadership to get the best out of him.Well, it the price is irrelevant, that makes perfect sense. But the price here is potentially considerable. I'm not worried his ability in offense or defense.....he's great. It's what is going on between the ears that concerns me. If it was only for the current year it would be a no brainer, as there would really be no significant downside.
Put it another way. Let's say that we roll the dice and sign him with the GC paying a small proportion of his v. large salary. He plays well for 6 weeks and then he cracks the shits and spends a lot of time not playing NRL (or playing it in a disinterested fashion). Would you absolve the club's management of responsibility for signing him? Or rip right into them?
We didn't come last in 2024.Those are fair points, but I don't think we are anywhere near in as bad a position as the Raiders have found themselves in. We made the playoffs 5 out of 7 seasons from 2017-2023, came last once in that time and missed narrowly the other. We came last in 2024 but had key players out for a long time. We have one of the best players in the game signed long-term, and 3 other recent SoO players. We didn't sell Khalil Mack.
We've got money to spend, if the club reckons Fifita is a good candidate for that money and they talk to him and are convinced he'll put in, that's fine by me, but I'm equally happy if that don't think he's worth rolling the dice on.
I don't think they will be backing themselves to though.I’d back the clubs leadership to get the best out of him.
The facts are undeniable and the truth will set you freeI’d rather look at his numbers in first grade for his entire career. He has never had a tackle efficiency less than 90% and his average running metres has only been below 100m in one season out of eight. That’s elite
View attachment 101868
![]()
David Fifita
The NRL profile of David Fifita including career statistics, season stats, games, tries, goals, tackles and fantasy scores.www.titans.com.au
Mate they waited for you to go and then strike...and strike they did...I lived there for most of the past 13 f**ken years and never got to watch an Eels game. Now they get an NRL team. Such merkins.