He signed with dogs, hopper said Galvin has told people
If that’s true, how bad was our pitch to a young player . If we can’t demonstrate what we have in terms of development , facilities etc it’s a dark day for the recruitment team. Hope this is incorrect, but prepared to be disappointed as before.
But but but we have the 70 million dollar centre of shit. So we can sign the likes of Morgan Harper and friends lolIf that’s true, how bad was our pitch to a young player . If we can’t demonstrate what we have in terms of development , facilities etc it’s a dark day for the recruitment team. Hope this is incorrect, but prepared to be disappointed as before.
So it’s not a fair fight when there is competition, seriously , not sure it’s the massive loss but underlines where we need to improve in the club if true.To be fair , Gould had been doing his pitch for 12 months plus had all his media mates talk up the dogs and development and ciraldo as master coach
To be fair , Gould had been doing his pitch for 12 months plus had all his media mates talk up the dogs and development and ciraldo as master coach
But, but we have someone who went to Harvard and a guru from Ferrier Hodgson, plus an ex Tigers list manager.in which we have absolutely no media presence at our club, none what’s so ever….
Why bother taking the tackle? There's a time and place for both, and the players are the ones who decide that at the time. Some passes are riskier than others and so there is a risk management calculation made every time a player has the opportunity to pass the ball. The opportunity to create a line break vs the risk of turning over possession. It's not as cut and dried for the player as it appears from the stands or on TV. If a centre passes to his winger will he definitely break the line? What if he drops the pass? What if he catches it but gets pushed into touch? At least if Penisini dummies and takes the tackle he could play the ball quickly and Moses gets it on the next tackle with time against a defensive line in disarray.