2025 R13 Sat - Gold Coast 16-28 Melbourne @ Cbus

[Apey]

NAS is pretty much the same distance back from the kicker than AKP was. Both behind.

Lol please, pull the other one.

 

[Bazal]

NAS is pretty much the same distance back from the kicker than AKP was. Both behind.

Nah the AKO one is more lineball for sure. But both onside

 

[Generalzod]

The bloke was onside the screen shot by @Apey proves it..

 

[Apey]

There's no clear, definitive indicator for the correct centimetre required to make that call.

The correct call should be that it's line ball and therefore too close to make a call of offside.

It shits me when they miss howlers and then act like they have superman-like laser vision on other calls that are bee's dicks one way or the other.

Make the obvious calls and stop trying to suddenly be super-f**king-man!

I agree, I'm not saying this one wasn't close, just the correct call was made. And it was never going to get over-turned in the bunker despite LU deluding themselves he was clearly behind.

If you want to see what an obvious offside looks like. Tackle 5 Titans first set of the game, Sam Verrills is a minimum 2m offside, Papuyhuzen catches it on the 5m line, is tackled by Verills on the 10m line.

 

[Warrimoo3]

NAS was clearly offside when he chased Hughes’ kick with 26 min to go in the 2nd half. A good metre. That was the one where Melbourne challenged the NAS knock on and the bunker upheld the challenge. The bunker did not check whether The chaser (NAS) was onside. They only looked at the challenge. It resulted in 6 points to the Storm. Badger should be sacked for not following protocol by

My bad. I’ll put it down to parallex error. Apologies to the bunker.

 

[speedster]

I agree, I'm not saying this one wasn't close, just the correct call was made. And it was never going to get over-turned in the bunker despite LU deluding themselves he was clearly behind.

If you want to see what an obvious offside looks like. Tackle 5 Titans first set of the game, Sam Verrills is a minimum 2m offside, Papuyhuzen catches it on the 5m line, is tackled by Verills on the 10m line.

Yeah, I just think this one was too close to uphold the decision and so they should reverse it on basis of there being insufficient evidence to back the initial call by the ref.

I know that's not the current rule but I wish they'd change it for calls such as offside like these. It should be either clear and undoubted offside otherwise it isn't.

Anyhoo ... Good chat.

 

[Generalzod]

Yeah, I just think this one was too close to uphold the decision and so they should reverse it on basis of there being insufficient evidence to back the initial call by the ref.

I know that's not the current rule but I wish they'd change it for calls such as offside like these. It should be either clear and undoubted offside otherwise it isn't.

Anyhoo ... Good chat.

The very picture that he posted proves he wasn’t offside.

 

[Fangs]

In the bin baby. Deserved.

 

[Diesel]

See ya Jerome. This isn’t the Panthers anymore

 

[Fangs]

Post it on your socials later Jarome. Plenty of likes to be had.

 

[speedster]

.

 

[Warrimoo3]

Des not happy in the presser. Said that Kasey got it wrong…again. Was controlled but didn’t miss.

 

[Belza1]

If only Kelly doesn't bomb that one and you aren't robbed of one and it's 22 all

Ifs and buts

 

[Belza1]

NAS was clearly offside when he chased Hughes’ kick with 26 min to go in the 2nd half. A good metre. That was the one where Melbourne challenged the NAS knock on and the bunker upheld the challenge. The bunker did not check whether The chaser (NAS) was onside. They only looked at the challenge. It resulted in 6 points to the Storm. Badger should be sacked for not following protocol by

Go to specsavers

 

[SLRBRONCOS]

Ifs and buts

literally started myself with 'if' ya dope haha

 

[Diesel]

..

 

[gerg]

NAS was clearly offside when he chased Hughes’ kick with 26 min to go in the 2nd half. A good metre. That was the one where Melbourne challenged the NAS knock on and the bunker upheld the challenge. The bunker did not check whether The chaser (NAS) was onside. They only looked at the challenge. It resulted in 6 points to the Storm. Badger should be sacked for not following protocol by

He wasn't even trying to catch the ball. He just stuck an arm out after jumping into the bloke trying to catch it. Clearly impeded him. It should have been a Titans penalty.

 

[Bazal]

He wasn't even trying to catch the ball. He just stuck an arm out after jumping into the bloke trying to catch it. Clearly impeded him. It should have been a Titans penalty.

I mean it probably started as a disruptor attempt but it's a bit hard to argue he wasn't going for the ball once he played at, and made contact with, the ball...

 

[Apey]

The very picture that he posted proves he wasn’t offside.

Would love to know what your point of reference is for judging this, please share.

 

[gerg]

I mean it probably started as a disruptor attempt but it's a bit hard to argue he wasn't going for the ball once he played at, and made contact with, the ball...

It's the very reason that disruptor interpretation was introduced. To stop the player from just running through the player attempting to catch the ball. But I guess we can just let it slide? It's not like the Melbourne Storm to take the absolute piss out of the rulebook.