It has to be proven as fact that they committed DV to judge them for DV. Doesnt seem to me a strange concept. Conviction in a court is a pretty good threshold for that IMO, otherwise its he said and she said and judgement based on speculation, whether you like a player, whether he plays for your club or whether he has a stupid neck tat.
Is Bret Stewart a sex offender?
Roberts was convicted of DV and that makes him at least as much of a POS as Auva. Roberts committed the DV and was convicted of it after his time at the Tigers. Prior to that him being a bad drunk, getting thrown out of clubs, getting in fights and throwing his career in the toilet does not make him as big a POS as Auva and critically (to get back to the original point (made MONTHS AGO), Tigers didnt sign a convicted DV offender.
To you and your mates bitching about me today in this thread its a bit rich when I didnt bring this up. I dont want to talk about Auva etc here or anywhere else, I dont want to post about all the shit merkins as much as anyone else here doesnt want to read about it.......so dont bring it up! I didnt bring it up, Stagger Eel did, completely out of the blue for no reason and then I get called a hypocrite and on my high horse when its simply a matter of Parra fans not being able to read or comprehend.
Happy not to discuss it, so dont bring it up or incorrectly claim Im a hypocrite.