What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

14 Team SL and Merged Championship?

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,465
Super League could expand to 14 teams as early as next year if a strategic review led by the Rugby Football League’s interim chair, Nigel Wood, can convince the existing 12 clubs that expansion is financially viable for 2026.

Wood, the governing body’s former chief executive, was brought back earlier this year after Super League clubs decided he should lead a review that would scrutinise all aspects of the professional game in the United Kingdom.

That included whether there is room for French clubs Catalans Dragons and Toulouse, as well as the sport’s long-term partnership with IMG. Their recommendations in 2022 suggested that Super League should only expand when there were enough clubs reaching the highest bracket in their gradings criteria.

But Wood’s review, which will be delivered to clubs next month at a meeting in Wakefield, will recommend a move to 14 as early as next year. Crucially, the Guardian has been told that more support has been garnered for that idea in recent weeks, with one high-ranking figure suggesting it was “as good as a done deal”.

However, there remains scepticism from some elite clubs about the financial impact expanding Super League would have for the existing 12 teams, which could be the big stumbling block.

The central distribution each club receives has shrunk drastically with the value of the competition’s television deal shrinking from £40m per year a decade ago to around £21m in 2025.

Some clubs who are open to 14 teams are only keen to commit to the idea once they have seen commitments on whether or not their central distribution would reduce further owing to more teams being in the competition.

ne idea that has been floated among the corridors of ambitious Championship clubs would be for two clubs to join the elite and receive minimal – or even no – central distribution in 2026, with the hope that the sport can then secure an increased TV deal for 2027 when the current Sky contract ends.

That would lead to an almighty scramble to become one of the two teams added to Super League with four clubs – Toulouse, Bradford, York and London – all believing they could step up for next year. It is understood that at least two of those teams would be willing to do so without distribution for one year, too. But expansion to 14 would not be received well by the National Rugby League (NRL), who remain interested in taking control of the competition in an attempt to revive its fortunes. Their preference would be to actually reduce Super League to 10 teams, not increase it.

One official in Australia believes that if clubs go with Wood’s proposals given his unpopularity in the corridors of the NRL, it would effectively spell the end of any meaningful interest in a deal between the two competitions. The RFL have been approached for comment.

 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,465
At the risk of accusations that I'm blunt, the idea of Super League becoming a 14-team competition in 2026 is bonkers.

It's becoming increasingly clear that an expanded Super League is the direction of travel, and in theory, there are plenty of reasons to do it. The obvious one is that it would eradicate the need for loop fixtures, which supporters loathe and damage competition integrity in equal measure. It would also provide more fixture variety and new experiences for supporters.

But the drive from some to push it through for next season makes little to no sense.
The crux of the issue is simple: Toulouse. The French club placed 13th in the IMG standings last year and appear to be the favourites to join the competition next season, provided that Salford Red Devils' plight sees them drop down the standings.


That would leave two French clubs in the competition, and there are clubs fearful that it will hurt revenue from their home games. It isn't ideal for Sky Sports as the French clubs don't drive strong subscriptions. Beyond that, it hurts attendances at centralised events like Magic Weekend. The competition's main sponsor, Betfred, can't have their logos on shirts for French home games as French laws prohibit the advertising of gambling, alcohol and tobacco products.

It is a far from ideal situation that even the most pro-French supporters can identify, but is there enough reason to push through an expanded competition next season? Quite simply, no.
For starters, where are the players coming from? The Super League table does not lie, and over the last five seasons, it has been shown that there aren't enough good players for a 12-team competition.

Since 2021, the teams that have finished bottom have managed two, five, four and three wins throughout a 27-round season. There have been whipping boys each year. Sixteen rounds into this season, there's a team with one win and another with two.

Super League is already trying to combat this by increasing the number of quota players allowed. The expectation is that ten players will be allowed per club next season, which will have a ripple effect by adding more players to the market.
The issue is that many clubs already in Super League aren't in a position to make the most of the rule changes because they're already up to the salary cap. Over time, that will figure itself out, but for next year, the influx of overseas talent won't be as free-flowing as the rules will allow. That's before starting the debate about the hit-and-miss nature of overseas signings in recent years.

It isn't like any current Championship sides are tearing up trees in the second-tier, either. Toulouse lost to Widnes this weekend, Bradford Bulls lost to Barrow, and big-spending Oldham, a club you'd suspect would take reduced central funding to earn a passage to the Super League, has a 66% win record.

Any of these clubs, or others, would need to make drastic changes to their squad to be competitive in Super League and trying to do that in July, at a time when at least one other club, potentially two if Salford go down, are also aggressive in the same player market, makes things very difficult.
The last thing Super League needs is more blowout scores but that seems highly likely if an increased competition is introduced next year. If that likelihood played out, would those new clubs travel in numbers that would make sizable financial differences to clubs? We've seen clubs at the bottom of the competition travel in sparse numbers for years.

Then there are the financial elements of an expanded competition. I'm reliably informed that a proposal has been put forward that makes 14 teams economically viable next year, which would include two clubs taking reduced central funding for a season.

That's all well and good, but the small matter of Super League's broadcast deal is up for renewal at the end of next season appears lost in all of that.

 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,465
Super League possibly expanding to 14 teams as early as next year is likely to be central to Nigel Wood’s strategic review: with more and more top-flight clubs open to the idea so long as it makes financial sense.

Wood has been leading a review of the professional game for the last few months, and is expected to deliver his verdict on the sport at a Council meeting where all clubs will be present in July.
But expansion of Super League – or at least the possibility of it – is going to be the main talking point, with a growing number of clubs now open to the idea.

One senior official at a Super League club told Love Rugby League they felt the move was ‘as good as a done deal’ – but there are still serious reservations about how putting two more teams into the elite competition would impact the finances of the existing 12.

Many clubs had privately accepted that there would be expansion in 2027, by which time the sport would have hopefully secured a new increased television deal that would allow the competition to grow and not impact the cashflow of those already in Super League.

The competition has experienced a major drop-off in TV rights across the last decade, with the sport now getting around £21million per year for its deal with Sky Sports, compared to £40million before the Covid-19 pandemic.

Various ideas have been suggested between clubs about how to make 14 teams work as early as next year – with one proposition that two clubs would come into the league from the Championship and take no central distribution. They would effectively fund promotion themselves.

That would allow the distribution the existing 12 receive to remain unchanged, a prospect that would be incredibly appealing for those already in the competition. Love Rugby League has been told that at least two teams currently playing in the Championship would be willing to take that financial risk.

But if those two teams were not the teams placed 13th and 14th in the IMG gradings, that would then create a situation where the game would have to consider abandoning the format that has only been live and used for one season: effectively ripping up the recommendations made by IMG.
Concerns also remain about other issues including the depth of the player pool, and whether there is enough talent to sustain 14 professional clubs.

However, a move to 14 would instantly solve the problem of a chaotic fixture list and remove the need for loop fixtures – something which all clubs would be in favour of.

But there is also a knock-on effect for interest in Super League from the NRL, Love Rugby League has been told, with any move to go to 14 – and follow Wood’s recommendations – likely to be hugely unpopular with administrators Down Under.

Were the NRL to take control of Super League or form a breakaway competition, they would prefer the league to shrink in size, not expand. One administrator in the NRL told Love Rugby League that going to 14 would effectively be a nail in the coffin for any interest from Peter V’landys and the NRL.

But for now, Wood will deliver his review next month and more and more clubs appear open to the prospect of Super League returning to a 14-team competition. Bradford Bulls, York Knights, Toulouse and London Broncos have all made clear of their intentions to push for promotion.

 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,465
I'm on the fence on this one.

Pros
Gets rid of the horrible loop fixtures no one likes
More content for media sale. more SL fans buying subscriptions and watching on TV
There's clubs in Championship that if well run could def add to SL

Cons
Not enough money and if clubs enter with no grant can they survive let alone compete?
Player depth will be tested, is adding more imports really good for the UK game?
Money would be better spent improving academies and a proper reserve grade, imo
We paid IMG a lot to come up with a long term vision and system for the game, looks like we are doing the usual RL thing and ditching it after a couple of years
 
Messages
15,526
Looks like SL is heading to 14, new quota rules to come in from next season allowing 10 overseas players per club to boost player pool.

Who ever thought it was a good idea to increase the overseas quota rule needs to be sacked. It does the British game no good and International Rugby League no good.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,465
Who ever thought it was a good idea to increase the overseas quota rule needs to be sacked. It does the British game no good and International Rugby League no good.
At the same time those same clubs claim they cant afford a decent academy and reserve grade. The games always been very short sighted.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,465
If they are planning to go to 14 clubs they should bring Toulouse in for Salford for 2026 as the 13th top graded club and then in this years grading in Oct pick the next two clubs and tell them they are in for2027 and to start building.
 
Messages
15,526
The one Steve Mascord invented. Seriously, NRL was considering 10 team league.
A 10 team uk comp with only British players would have helped the game over there and international Rugby League.
So what this means now is that the NRL will have zero interest in buying into super League, if they had any interest before.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,878
A 10 team uk comp with only British players would have helped the game over there and international Rugby League.
So what this means now is that the NRL will have zero interest in buying into super League, if they had any interest before.

If NRL get involved only option will be rebel comp. Clubs must act first.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,878
If they are planning to go to 14 clubs they should bring Toulouse in for Salford for 2026 as the 13th top graded club and then in this years grading in Oct pick the next two clubs and tell them they are in for2027 and to start building.

Who are the next two?!
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,465
A 10 team uk comp with only British players would have helped the game over there and international Rugby League.
So what this means now is that the NRL will have zero interest in buying into super League, if they had any interest before.
Loop fixtures suck and a ten club comp would have meant more and become very stale.
Stick with the IMG process and SL will get there with or without the NRL.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,465
Who are the next two?!
1. St Helens – A – 17.02 – Super League

2. Wigan Warriors – A – 16.91 – Super League

3. Leeds Rhinos – A – 16.84 – Super League

4. Warrington Wolves – A – 16.27 – Super League

5. Hull Kingston Rovers – A – 15.97 – Super League

6. Catalans Dragons – A – 15.52 – Super League

7. Leigh Leopards – A – 15.13 – Super League
8. Wakefield Trinity – A – 15.09 – Super League

9. Castleford Tigers – A – 15.02 – Super League

10. Hull FC – B – 14.51 – Super League

11. Huddersfield Giants – B – 14.48 – Super League

12. Salford Red Devils – B – 13.97 – Super League

13. Toulouse Olympique – B – 13.58 – Championship

14. London Broncos – B – 12.65 – Championship

15. York Knights – B – 12.42 – Championship

16. Bradford Bulls – B – 12.15 – Championship

17. Barrow Raiders – B – 11.22 – Championship

18. Featherstone Rovers – B – 10.75 – Championship

19. Keighley Cougars – B – 9.02 – Championship

20. Halifax Panthers – B – 8.79 – Championship

21. Sheffield Eagles – B – 8.77 – Championship
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,878
1. St Helens – A – 17.02 – Super League

2. Wigan Warriors – A – 16.91 – Super League

3. Leeds Rhinos – A – 16.84 – Super League

4. Warrington Wolves – A – 16.27 – Super League

5. Hull Kingston Rovers – A – 15.97 – Super League

6. Catalans Dragons – A – 15.52 – Super League

7. Leigh Leopards – A – 15.13 – Super League
8. Wakefield Trinity – A – 15.09 – Super League

9. Castleford Tigers – A – 15.02 – Super League

10. Hull FC – B – 14.51 – Super League

11. Huddersfield Giants – B – 14.48 – Super League

12. Salford Red Devils – B – 13.97 – Super League

13. Toulouse Olympique – B – 13.58 – Championship

14. London Broncos – B – 12.65 – Championship

15. York Knights – B – 12.42 – Championship

16. Bradford Bulls – B – 12.15 – Championship

17. Barrow Raiders – B – 11.22 – Championship

18. Featherstone Rovers – B – 10.75 – Championship

19. Keighley Cougars – B – 9.02 – Championship

20. Halifax Panthers – B – 8.79 – Championship

21. Sheffield Eagles – B – 8.77 – Championship

This old ass list with Salford in 12
 

Jonty

Juniors
Messages
1,070
Who ever thought it was a good idea to increase the overseas quota rule needs to be sacked. It does the British game no good and International Rugby League no good.
What if a rule could be made that states of the 10 overseas players 4 must be French or PNG?
 

Latest posts

Top