Delboy
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,231
Looks sideways at the recruitment gurus WTF!When were they offered those contract extensions again?
Looks sideways at the recruitment gurus WTF!When were they offered those contract extensions again?
So we have 2 x players on gardening leave probably costing over a million dollars on the year on the cap.
How is that good business
Yet again i come back to the fact the clowns who signed off on these deals should be put under the microscope who are still employed by the club..
Its hamstrung Ryles and the club ability to recruit for next year.
I think that’s a fair point however why has every single BA bum boy fallen off a cliff including his two nepo kids? The only one I’d argue has improved although it was from a very low base is Russell. However every single one of them on big contracts has regressed. ALL OF THEM. Which is why Ryles has or will be f**king them off.Both Matterson and Lane are 30 years old this year. They were signed to these contracts after they just had the best seasons of their careers. Matterson played Origin not long before he signed that, and Lane was instrumental in getting us to a GF.
Were they supposed to know that both players would fall off a cliff ability-wise? You’re looking at this in hindsight, which is always easier. Harder to predict how a player will perform in the future, but you can look at their recent performances to try and judge, in which case these were players we wanted to keep.
Were you a fan of these signings at the time? I don’t remember many people on here upset about them, in fact quite the opposite.
I think that’s a fair point however why has every single BA bum boy fallen off a cliff including his two nepo kids? The only one I’d argue has improved although it was from a very low base is Russell. However every single one of them on big contracts has regressed. ALL OF THEM. Which is why Ryles has or will be f**king them off.
GuthersonYeah it’s a worry as to why so many of our players, both young blokes and experienced guys, regressed so much over the last three years. No idea as to why, but just pointing out it’s not something that anyone could have foreseen.
Hopefully we have players who are on the up from here on out and we get rid of the players who are more likely to decline (which we already have with RCG and Gutho).
I wasn't a fan of either getting 4 years.Both Matterson and Lane are 30 years old this year. They were signed to these contracts after they just had the best seasons of their careers. Matterson played Origin not long before he signed that, and Lane was instrumental in getting us to a GF.
Were they supposed to know that both players would fall off a cliff ability-wise? You’re looking at this in hindsight, which is always easier. Harder to predict how a player will perform in the future, but you can look at their recent performances to try and judge, in which case these were players we wanted to keep.
Were you a fan of these signings at the time? I don’t remember many people on here upset about them, in fact quite the opposite.
Gutherson
Sivo
Penisini
Brown
Joffa
Cartwright
Lane
RCG
Paulo
Matterson
Hands
Lussick
Greig
Guymer
Hopgood
Matt Arthur
Jake Arthur
Have all regressed and either have or will be shown the door.
This can’t be just an accident.
I wasn't a fan of either getting 4 years.
You only hand out 4 x year contracts or more to marquee players.
Lane and Matto never fitted that bill.
Paulo is having his best season in years. Otherwise, the rest have fallen off, but they are also dealing with an inexperienced coach. Ryles will improve, but right now he is a rookie.I think that’s a fair point however why has every single BA bum boy fallen off a cliff including his two nepo kids? The only one I’d argue has improved although it was from a very low base is Russell. However every single one of them on big contracts has regressed. ALL OF THEM. Which is why Ryles has or will be f**king them off.
Jake Arthur is having his best season, with 20 try assists in 12 games.The Arthurs are probably as good as they always were. They didn’t regress but they didn’t improve either.
What has an inexperienced coach got to do with simple player performance, not tactics, not anything but their own measurable performance. Do you actually post just to increase your numbers, as they seem to be getting more insignificant by detail and sense.Paulo is having his best season in years. Otherwise, the rest have fallen off, but they are also dealing with an inexperienced coach. Ryles will improve, but right now he is a rookie.
Lane was one of the best forwards in the game in 2022, and in the preceding four years was a quality first grader. His decline after 2022 was immediate and drastic:I’ll give you Lane, sure.
But Matterson was an Origin player who was only going to be 32 at the end of the 4 year contract. Of course he was a marquee player.
So are coaches responsible for their team's form or not? Asking for a friend in Leeds.What has an inexperienced coach got to do with simple player performance, not tactics, not anything but their own measurable performance. Do you actually post just to increase your numbers, as they seem to be getting more insignificant by detail and sense.
They have all been poor decisions on options, length of contracts, size of deal , could you see that happen with the clubs that are at the sharp end of the table, not sure they wouldn’t have reacted quicker and probably not made that mistake anyway.
Oh please Matto has never been marquee.I’ll give you Lane, sure.
But Matterson was an Origin player who was only going to be 32 at the end of the 4 year contract. Of course he was a marquee player.
BA did do a lot of dumb things...add this to the listOh please Matto has never been marquee.
He played 1 origin game and was dumped.
Outside of a 7 week period while playing for a contract he hasn't shown the consistency of a elite player his ability suggests he could have been.
A player that the coach didnt pick for a semi final 8-9 months earlier isnt a marquee one.
We beat the Knights in 2021 and BA left Matto out of the squad and picked Makatoa ahead of him when he was fit and available.
Makatoa let in a soft try so Matto got brought back in against Penrith.
I would have played Matto both finals that year but BA clearly wasn't happy with something in Matto's game to put Makatoa ahead of him in a elimination final.
Yep.I wasn't a fan of either getting 4 years.
You only hand out 4 x year contracts or more to marquee players.
Lane and Matto never fitted that bill.
Nonsense. Matterson was a 27yo journeyman by then (we were his third club in seven seasons), and there was the questionable and no yet explained exit from his Wests contract.I’ll give you Lane, sure.
But Matterson was an Origin player who was only going to be 32 at the end of the 4 year contract. Of course he was a marquee player.