What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Gay rights campaigner loses Footy Show case

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://sxnews.e-p.net.au/news/anti-discrimination-board-accepts-footy-show-complaint-5549.html

Anti-Discrimination Board accepts Footy Show complaint
Written by Peter Hackney
Thursday, 28 May 2009 18:16

The NSW Anti-Discrimination Board (ADB) has accepted a complaint lodged by gay activist Gary Burns against Channel Nine's The Footy Show.

The complaint concerns the May 7 episode of the rugby league program, which featured former NRL player and Footy Show presenter Matthew Johns playing a character called 'Elton Johns', an allusion to gay British music icon Elton John.

The documentary-style skit featured Matthew's brother, Andrew Johns, telling the audience he was "so ashamed" of his gay sibling, who was taken to hospital for being gay.

Hospital staff in the skit were told "it's faulty" when presented with 'Elton'.

The ADB is now seeking a copy of the offending broadcast, with Burns telling SX the matter would now go to court unless successfully conciliated beforehand.

Speaking to SX this evening, Burns said he was interested in conciliation, but that successful conciliation required a number of conditions to be met by Channel Nine, including: a full page apology to the gay community in the pages of SX, an apology in a mainstream publication such as The Sydney Morning Herald, an on-air apology to the gay community during The Footy Show, and a segment on The Footy Show "explaining the dangers and ramifications of homosexual vilification and the reasons why it is wrong".

SX is awaiting comment from Channel Nine on Burns' demands.

In the latest developments on the story, Channel Nine has apologised to Burns for any hurt caused, but says the skit was taken out of context.

"We have now had an opportunity to investigate the matters raised in your email," wrote Kiah Wood, Corporate Counsel for Channel Nine, in a letter seen by SX. "Firstly, Nine apologises if you found the broadcast to be offensive, or if it caused you any distress. Nine takes very seriously issues of discrimination on any basis, including sexuality, gender, race or religion. Nine certainly does not advocate discrimination or violence, and these values are reflected in Nine's internal policies and training programs."

Wood went on to explain that while the network apologised for any hurt caused, it did not consider that the broadcast vilified gay people.

Burns was advised to pursue the matter with the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) if he was dissatisfied with the response, and was told not to contact Channel Nine again except by letter or fax.

The activist told SX that he was not satisfied with the response and would press on with legal action.

The news comes as the story garners widespread mainstream media attention following on from SX's reports on the matter. Coverage today included articles in The Daily Telegraph, ABC News Online, The Sydney Morning Herald and Brisbane's Courier-Mail.

Hundreds of people have weighed into the debate online. At time of writing, 134 comments were posted on today's news.com.au story alone, with many readers taking issue with Burns' action, citing concerns over freedom of speech.

Typical of the opinions expressed were those of 'J', who said: "Political correctness going mad, soon we will have to walk round with our own personal lawyer to go over everything we say to make sure we don't offend anyone."

However, a significant number also supported Burns.

'Thommo of Aus' wrote: "It might not be so damn funny if your kid struggles with being gay and tops himself because his parents refer to the poor kid as 'faulty'. I've been a fan of The Footy Show for years but I just couldn't find this funny."

Australian Coalition for Equality (ACE) spokesperson Rodney Croome told SX that free speech needed to be balanced with the dangers posed by vilification.

It was up to legal experts to decide where to draw the line, he said.

"It's the job of gay activists to highlight hatred any way we can," Croome told SX. "It's the job of judges to balance this with free speech. With the right of free speech comes a responsibility not to abuse that right by vilifying others."

Asked why he thought The Footy Show didn't make similar skits involving minority groups such as Jews and Asians, Croome told SX: "Homophobia remains this country's last acceptable prejudice."
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Speaking to SX this evening, Burns said he was interested in conciliation, but that successful conciliation required a number of conditions to be met by Channel Nine, including: a full page apology to the gay community in the pages of SX, an apology in a mainstream publication such as The Sydney Morning Herald, an on-air apology to the gay community during The Footy Show, and a segment on The Footy Show "explaining the dangers and ramifications of homosexual vilification and the reasons why it is wrong".

:crazy:
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,972
So you believe that there is a genetic difference in gay people?

yes....hell, even Shorty thinks there's a genetic reason.

It sounds like you're trying to imply this is a bad thing? I'm no expert on genetics, but if i remember correctly everyone has miniscule genetic mutations. The vast majority don't have any noticeable effect. Beneficial ones get passed on. Its how evolution occurs. (I think thats the gist of it anyhow)
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
111,259
i thought the burn in hell post was a joke. And a good one.
Believe me, I tried to run with it. Got a few bites but fmd if the new breed of newbies don't take themselves way too seriously nowadays. Some of them were born in 1996... think about that.
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
Not bad. Maybe unreasonable.

It would be like saying that there is a gene that makes you support Easts.
 

nqcowboy87

Bench
Messages
4,181
The most well-known homosexual animal is the dwarf chimpanzee, one of humanity's closes relatives. The entire species is bisexual. Sex plays an conspicuous roll in all their activities and takes the focus away from violence, which is the most typical method of solving conflicts among primates and many other animals.

hah, cause when i get into an argument with another guy, i just say hey let me stick it in your gravy pipe and will be golden:lol:
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
106,995
yes....hell, even Shorty thinks there's a genetic reason.

It sounds like you're trying to imply this is a bad thing? I'm no expert on genetics, but if i remember correctly everyone has miniscule genetic mutations. The vast majority don't have any noticeable effect. Beneficial ones get passed on. Its how evolution occurs. (I think thats the gist of it anyhow)

That's the very simplistic version yes...although you're talking about heredity and not really evolution as such
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,972
Not bad. Maybe unreasonable.

It would be like saying that there is a gene that makes you support Easts.

Assuming there is a valid point under bagging Easts, I don't think its like saying that at all. Supporting Easts is a choice. Homosexuality isn't.
 

nqcowboy87

Bench
Messages
4,181
what i dont get is the really over the top fruits, im sorry homosexuals, like carson cressly and that anooying little weiner that works on channel nine richard something (did that renovation show), molly meldrums gay, ian roberts is gay do they prance around like theyre a magical fairy from sugartop mountain, no they dont
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
That's a wish, not a fact.

Maybe it's midichlorians. Just as much evidence as genes in this regard.

As for Easts - NFI
 

Latest posts

Top