Different kind of Rabbit
Coach
- Messages
- 15,545
Dear God no!
Anasta has finals experience, and has won a GF. That's rare in our team and could come in handy for a club that will hopefully be around in September.
Don't forget SBW and Bennett to come,Rusty has deep pockets and a creative CEO.Well he won a GF with a team well over the cap and the wabbits are way over the cap so maybe its a good fit
Anasta has finals experience, and has won a GF. That's rare in our team and could come in handy for a club that will hopefully be around in September.
Bennett is a coach, he doesn't come under the cap. SBW, if he comes, will come in 2013, when the cap should be significantly increased. No need for a "creative" CEO...and no need for us to increase our monthly order of brown paper bgs.Don't forget SBW and Bennett to come,Rusty has deep pockets and a creative CEO.
By "hopefully" I mean certainly. 3peat, we'll win this year, then with Bennett we'll win next year by an even larger amount, possibly going undefeated all year, then in 2013 with SBW (and with a Burgess-SBW-Taylor back row that will go down in history as arguably the greatest backrow in the history of the game)we'll get the 3peat. Is that a better "tune"?gee,I thought you guys had it in the bag, you've seemed to have changed your tune..:?
2011. If the rumour is true (I guess we'll see by the end of Sunday) it makes some sense. DT (I know I know, scum rag, but once in a blue moon they accidently get things right) saying Anasta's relationship with Easts is at "breaking point", and Bradford have lost Orford.Bunniesman,
Is that for 2011 or 2012?
Bubbles
I've heard Sutton is on around 400k, (last year of a backended contract) which is roughly what Anasta is on. And also as the Roosters are shopping him, I'm pretty sure if we only have 400k and we take him and he's on 450k then the Roosters have to pay that 50k.Wouldn't anasta cost more than what they would get for sutton
Not too sure about that. Just about everyone's critique of Souths chances in 2011 goes along the lines of "not with those halves".If Souffs get rid of Sutton to accommodate Anasta or even $BW then they've got rocks in there head.
Like Hunters said, just about every Souths critic who says we can't go all the way puts it on Sandow and Sutton. So if we do nothing, people will say "they've got rocks in their head". But if we upgrade one of the halves everyone is always complaining about with arguably the best player of the finals last year, someone with multiple grand finals of expierience, people still complain. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.If Souffs get rid of Sutton to accommodate Anasta or even $BW then they've got rocks in there head.
Your ass isn't exactly a reliable sourceI've heard a rumour, Anasta to Souths and Sutton to Bradford, deal done by the end of the week.
He would be a good pickup for any club , however i feel he burnt his bridges with souths.
I'm just thowing out a rumour I've heard, which is the exact point of this thread. Many others have done the same. And while many of the rumours have been proven to be right, many also have been proven to be BS. This rumour could end up in either category, we'll see over the next few days.Your ass isn't exactly a reliable source
I've heard Sutton is on around 400k, (last year of a backended contract) which is roughly what Anasta is on. And also as the Roosters are shopping him, I'm pretty sure if we only have 400k and we take him and he's on 450k then the Roosters have to pay that 50k.
It's the last year of his contract. The contract may have averaged 300k or even less over it's life.No chance in hell that Sutton is on 400k. No management team is that geniused.
Really? Your job is never safe? If by "your job is never safe" you actually mean "your job is 100% safe for the duration of your contract, except for the possibility where you may move on elsewhere for a contract of equal or better value" then you're absolutely correct.if its true who would want to be a souths player... your job is never safe... just ask champion and possibly sutton.