Father Ted
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,531
Might be better to start with Hunt , Weyman off the bench for Impact alone with Young and his bad knees
I'd play King and Rein Both lack a bit of experience but you only get that from playing and I see next year as a bit of a rebuilding year. Besides best to do it now while they are surrounded by experienced people . Young is a living legend But I'd play him at lock and off the bench and Fein? Fien? was so out of form at the end of the year imo but I'd consider him as a back up for Hooker , Halfback. But not in the starting 17 first up unless he trials really well. And yourself?
I'd Start with King but when the teams get tired I'd have Rein darting out from dummy half. He's a tough little nuggett and can take a bit of a hit. Working on the belief that nothing exhausts big men quicker than constant back peddling. That would open up space for the backs and we have some damm good backs. Just an opinion
Will Matthews. I think Ah Mau is going to be a good'un, but still a year or two til we see the best of him.We need fiens experience. He'll be there.
I still think we need some real impact from the bench. Hopefully one of the new recruits can fill the void.
Who's most likely out of the newbies??
I know the Dell is a dual international, grand final winning legend, but I just can't understand this.
Obviously Nightingale would never let you down wherever he played, but surely Dell would have seen closer than anyone how unnatural a ball player Nightingale is.
I know people are probably going to say, well I trust Dells judgement etc. but surely our player of the year , and one of the best wingers in the world can stay where he plays his best footy.
I'm Nightingales biggest fan, but can't understand this one.
If Tomkins is not interested then lets go for a local junior - Brett Stuart.
or maybe even Brett Stewart.
According to the poll, 60% of us believe it would be good to sign Tomkins. And if I ran a poll on the idea of signing Stewart, we would probably get a similar result.
It is said that Brett Steward has an out option if Hasler leaves Manly. He must have had a reason for doing that. In addition Manly will have to upgrade contracts to keep some of their existing players with 'out options' so they would unlikely have enough to keep everyone. Player managers have already gone public saying that their newly capped Kangaroos.
Maybe I'm wrong again but its worth putting out there however, this time it is only a gut feeling; no whispers from anyone.
Sorry Gypsy I can't agree with you. Tompkins performed really well against Australia; he was a stand out for the poms.
To replace a proven quality player with another of similar standard is the right thing to do. You can't lose. It strengthens the team and adds depth to the support playing strength. Unless Saints want to upgrade some current contracts, it would be foolish not to try and buy someone to replace Boyd.
Run another Poll on Tomkins, and see how many people have seen him play more than 3 times. Not really enough to form an opinion.
I watch him week in week out, and have said it many times, he wouldn't have the same impact in the NRL. Too sideways, too small, only good against staggered defence and rubbish kick chases.
Stewart would only be a temporary fix, I'm happy for us to put the faith in our youngsters.
Look at the Broncos, they might have missed out on Inglis, but as a result Reed, Yow Yeh, Beale, Hoffman etc. stepped up. Have a little faith.
Now is the time to be pushing a few young blokes through, before our experienced players all retire within a year or two of each other.
We don't want to do a West Indies.
I would be disappointed if Kyle Stanley does not get first crack at the custodian role.