How will the Roosters do in 2012

[melon....]

They wont seriously contend for another 2-3 years, but the junior stocks are looking very good.

One thing they will do though in 2012. Finish higher than souffs.

But so will everyone else.

 

[melon....]

We didn't play our nrl players anywhere near the amount of time the roosters did, your an idiot.

Though after being silent from the sharks thrashing to a basically full strength manly, with them missing 2 of their best forwards i'd expect you to try and claim something.

Your 3 first grade forwards including Tollman, were dominated by a kid.

Arona. Remember the name.

 

[firechild]

I find it funny, you play down losing basically full strength, to the sharks without gallen or jez smith, by 40 odd points, and talk up this when we played our nrl squad for about 20 mins and nsw cup the rest and lose by 12

So basically full strength is fielding a team for the first half that contains 1 first grade player (with all of about 6 games to his name)? Then minus Stewart, D. Williams, T. Williams, Watmough, Rose in the 2nd half, but it's still basically full strength. :crazy:

BTW, it was 32, not 40 odd. I thought maths was your strong point?

 

[ceagle]

So basically full strength is fielding a team for the first half that contains 1 first grade player (with all of about 6 games to his name)? Then minus Stewart, D. Williams, T. Williams, Watmough, Rose in the 2nd half, but it's still basically full strength. :crazy:

BTW, it was 32, not 40 odd. I thought maths was your strong point?

Pretty sure Glenn Stewart was missing aswell, and most alot of the tries were conceded in the 1st half when the 1st graders didn't play.

Doggiesbro's argument is basically invalid as always.

 

[Ozzy]

So basically full strength is fielding a team for the first half that contains 1 first grade player (with all of about 6 games to his name)? Then minus Stewart, D. Williams, T. Williams, Watmough, Rose in the 2nd half, but it's still basically full strength. :crazy:

BTW, it was 32, not 40 odd. I thought maths was your strong point?

32 is closer to 40 an it is to 20 so it is 40. Can't you do c Maths? :sarcasm:

 

[Silent Knight]

I can tell you what will happen to the Roosters when they play the Knights...

In Newcastle...we know chicken. Deep fried, none of this healthy grilled sh*t.

As for the rest of 2012...beats the hell out of me. Hopefully they'll go better than Souffs.

 

[firechild]

32 is closer to 40 an it is to 20 so it is 40. Can't you do c Maths? :sarcasm:

My bad. More than 30 so it might as well have been 40. But I didn't do maths C so I forget that we round up and down randomly to suit our agenda.

 

[RWB]

We didn't play our nrl players anywhere near the amount of time the roosters did, your an idiot.

Though after being silent from the sharks thrashing to a basically full strength manly, with them missing 2 of their best forwards i'd expect you to try and claim something.

Yes you guys did, please stop talking bullshit.

 

[DoggiesBro]

Yes you guys did, please stop talking bullshit.

I was at the game you idiot, Barba, Tolman, Graham, Pritchard, Morris, Eastwood etc all played 20 minutes or under.

Roosters had about 20 players compared to the dogs with 30+ and the nsw cup grade played the ENTIRE first half, and half the second half.

 

[adamkungl]

So much butthurt over a trial :lol:

 

[ceagle]

I was at the game you idiot, Barba, Tolman, Graham, Pritchard, Morris, Eastwood etc all played 20 minutes or under.

Roosters had about 20 players compared to the dogs with 30+ and the nsw cup grade played the ENTIRE first half, and half the second half.

funny because I know you weren't there at all. Please stop lying.

 

[sputneek]

I was at the game you idiot, Barba, Tolman, Graham, Pritchard, Morris, Eastwood etc all played 20 minutes or under.

Roosters had about 20 players compared to the dogs with 30+ and the nsw cup grade played the ENTIRE first half, and half the second half.

Sydney Roosters 28 (Daniel Tupou, Mark Kheirallah, Tinirau Arona, Daniel Mortimer, Justin Carney Tries; Kheirallah 4 Goals) defeated Canterbury Bulldogs 16 (Tupou Sopoaga, Josh Morris, Johnathan Wright Tries; Goodwin 2, Cutler Goals)

Just by looking at the players who scored I can tell we didn't play our full strength team against you, if we did we would have won by 50. None of the Easts players who scored will be in the starting side in round 1 unless injuries occur so accept that you got rolled by a 2nd string Roosters side :lol:

 

[DoggiesBro]

So basically full strength is fielding a team for the first half that contains 1 first grade player (with all of about 6 games to his name)? Then minus Stewart, D. Williams, T. Williams, Watmough, Rose in the 2nd half, but it's still basically full strength. :crazy:

BTW, it was 32, not 40 odd. I thought maths was your strong point?

Oldfield, Whare, Lyon, Matai, Foran, DCE, King, Ballin, Kite, Galavaou, Burher, Lussick, G Stewart,

Starting

3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13.

WITH 3 MORE from the bench.

GEE how undermanned.

Sharks were missing their 2 best forwards too.:lol::lol::lol: 40 point loss.

 

[adamkungl]

We don't play them for realsies until round 12. How disappointing. f**k that's going to be embarrassing for them.

 

[goosie]

rooster are in for a poor year in my opinion.

 

[DoggiesBro]

Sydney Roosters 28 (Daniel Tupou, Mark Kheirallah, Tinirau Arona, Daniel Mortimer, Justin Carney Tries; Kheirallah 4 Goals) defeated Canterbury Bulldogs 16 (Tupou Sopoaga, Josh Morris, Johnathan Wright Tries; Goodwin 2, Cutler Goals)

Just by looking at the players who scored I can tell we didn't play our full strength team against you, if we did we would have won by 50. None of the Easts players who scored will be in the starting side in round 1 unless injuries occur so accept that you got rolled by a 2nd string Roosters side :lol:

Your an idiot, Arona would be in your first grade squad easily.

You had the bulk of your first grade squad just like us, the difference is we played ours for 20 minutes or less, as we played nsw cup team the first half and infact listed 2 full squads 1 of nsw cup players. We played them for 3/4 of the game.

Roosters listed one team and were missing a few first grade players like the dogs with Ennis, Hodkinson etc. However your's played the game as you had ONE team with about 20 players.

How dumb can you be?

 

[DoggiesBro]

So much butthurt over a trial :lol:

I agree, Ceagle needs to let go the 40 point loss to the sharks without gallen or jez.

 

[adamkungl]

Your an idiot, Arona would be in your first grade squad easily.

Not necessarily. He'd be a walk up start at the Dogs, but at Easts he has Kennedy, JWH, Tasi ahead of him.

 

[sputneek]

We had at least 25 players playing doggiesdimwit and thanks for telling me how my teams gonna run out on round 1. Arona would be 5th choice prop.

 

[Jud]

I'm a bit confused by all of the hooting and hollering over trial matches. Isn't a chance to test out combinations/new signings etc??

From memory, didn't the dogs have a few good trial wins last year. How'd that work out for them?

I'm a tigers fan, but certainly wouldn't be carrying on about their game against eels (well, maybe my blue and gold brother did cop some witty text messages)