Send off vs Going on Report

[Garbler]

Don't pretend to know the reasoning behind current rules so correct me if I'm wrong:

But would it be better if a player was sent off (5/10 minutes whatever) at time of incident, no judiciary etc instead of putting incidents on report?

For example, JWH tonight, obviously led with the forearm, clocked McQueen in the neck with an elbow. In post game interview said he could be out for next 2 final games.

2 reasons I have for sin-bin > judiciary:

1. Wouldn't it be better if Souths got the advantage as it was their player who copped it?
2. I want to see a team field its best players. I want to see Roosters lose in the finals with JWH, not without him. It would be an anti-climax.

Could, say, video refs do the job for 99% of judiciary hearings? And leave the really dirty plays for the judiciary, i.e. Gallen pulling stitches, Burgess abusing genitals etc

Thoughts?

 

[bellyache]

Don't pretend to know the reasoning behind current rules so correct me if I'm wrong:

But would it be better if a player was sent off (5/10 minutes whatever) at time of incident, no judiciary etc instead of putting incidents on report?

For example, JWH tonight, obviously led with the forearm, clocked McQueen in the neck with an elbow. In post game interview said he could be out for next 2 final games.

2 reasons I have for sin-bin > judiciary:

1. Wouldn't it be better if Souths got the advantage as it was their player who copped it?
2. I want to see a team field its best players. I want to see Roosters lose in the finals with JWH, not without him. It would be an anti-climax.

Could, say, video refs do the job for 99% of judiciary hearings? And leave the really dirty plays for the judiciary, i.e. Gallen pulling stitches, Burgess abusing genitals etc

Thoughts?

Sook

 

[simostorm]

Nothing in it.. Judiciary should clear them. Jwh wasnt intentional. If they get charged then judiciary members need to be sacked.

 

[Card Shark]

Sook

You are a fuvkwit mate.

It's alright for you to start 3 threads about the same subject but as soon as someone else starts 1 about a reasonable topic, you bag him out.

I'd suggest that makes you the sook.

 

[bellyache]

You are a fuvkwit mate.

It's alright for you to start 3 threads about the same subject but as soon as someone else starts 1 about a reasonable topic, you bag him out.

I'd suggest that makes you the sook.

 

[Card Shark]

How did you know?

Thanks, it's an honour being called that by the king .

:lol:

 

[bellyache]

How did you know?

Thanks, it's an honour being called that by the king .

:lol:

Smoke and mirrors babe.. Robbo might be so kind?:lol:

 

[Meth]

Nothing in it.. Judiciary should clear them. Jwh wasnt intentional. If they get charged then judiciary members need to be sacked.

I agree.

It looked worse on slow motion than what it was. It was awkward, but doubtfully intentional. The refs handled that whole situation (including Burgess' niggles) perfectly. Judiciary might suspend him because it's JWH though.

 

[carcharias]

Heat of the moment stuff - accidentally intentional .
Let him off.

As for burgess ... What a dumb prick.

Got a bit of cat in him.

 

[Lucas-Con]

I hope he doesnt get suspended I doubt it though judiciary are usually lenient around finals time.

 

[Stagger Lee]

I hope he doesnt get suspended I doubt it though judiciary are usually lenient around finals time.

He is a kiwi so the Judiciary will give Jared Waerea-Hargreavesan extra 2 weeks, it's the Australian way ;-)

 

[Stinkler]

Ban him for 6 weeks so he misses the World Cup too.

 

[kbw]

I agree that the bin should be able to be used the case of report as well.
but I do not agree that JWH should have been sent or binned

 

[Matrix]

Should be 2 weeks for Jwh was a grub act,hopefully he wont miss the world cup.

 

[kdalymc]

Why is this thread titled "send off" when you've only talked about the sin bin...