What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Simpsons Inanimate Object Mafia Game Thread (Over, Summary up!)

KeepingTheFaith

Referee
Messages
25,235
I take that to mean AFS was well aware he was dead...which is a jerk move and I'm not sure I trust what he said.

So Mis or Monk?

or Soc

AFS claims Whall, Whall claims Mis, Pugzley claims Soc

Not sure why people are suss on Monk for being the victim of a force vote, but whatever.
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
106,647
or Soc

AFS claims Whall, Whall claims Mis, Pugzley claims Soc

Not sure why people are suss on Monk for being the victim of a force vote, but whatever.

Or soc, yes. Hadn't thought of that. I'm not 100% sold on the force though, it seemed pretty elaborate. Iunno
 

KeepingTheFaith

Referee
Messages
25,235
For me, Mis and Whall are claims from individuals that are circumspect at best.

On the other side there's something either really confusing or suspicious going on with Soc's power, or at least claimed power.
 

KeepingTheFaith

Referee
Messages
25,235
Soc claimed to have a power that only partly protected a player, his claim of Dutchy being the autodialler is what swayed the vote to Dutchy. Pugzley then claims he redirected Soc to Monk therefore Soc must have the force vote. Mis then claimed a couple of pages back that Soc had a kill, but that could be confusion on Mis' part.
 

Misanthrope

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
47,624
Misanthrope simply isn't town. Vote for him.

You have nothing more than that. We heard you the first time.

I've never heard of a power that just says 'town' or 'not town'. If I'm not town, what is it you think I am?

I still find your roleclaim highly suspicious. You latched on to Smiley's vague idea as soon as you possibly could.

Soc claimed to have a power that only partly protected a player, his claim of Dutchy being the autodialler is what swayed the vote to Dutchy. Pugzley then claims he redirected Soc to Monk therefore Soc must have the force vote. Mis then claimed a couple of pages back that Soc had a kill, but that could be confusion on Mis' part.

Somebody attacked somebody and damaged their leg. soc believes it was Monk he was redirected against, but I could be wrong.
 

KeepingTheFaith

Referee
Messages
25,235
You have nothing more than that. We heard you the first time.

I've never heard of a power that just says 'town' or 'not town'. If I'm not town, what is it you think I am?

I still find your roleclaim highly suspicious. You latched on to Smiley's vague idea as soon as you possibly could.



Somebody attacked somebody and damaged their leg. soc believes it was Monk he was redirected against, but I could be wrong.

Soc said he protected Dutchy from the killer and couldn't understand it when Dutchy came up as a chair instead of the autodialler. Then Pugzley came in and said that he redirected Soc to Monk and said that means Soc was the one who force voted Monk who let out the info that started the lynch on Dutchy to begin with.

If I had to guess I'd lean towards two options....

A) Soc being redirected to Monk but somebody else force voting Monk as well which means Soc's action never got written up.

or

B) Soc force voted Monk to get Dutchy and then claimed autodialler to give the force vote more substance.
 

Misanthrope

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
47,624
Ah, I just misunderstood then.

So soc claims protector (which Dutchy has since said he was, and has been proven to be) and Pugzley points out he redirected soc at Monk, who was force voted and potentially attacked.

vote soc123_au makes sense to me.
 

whall15

Coach
Messages
15,871
Fine.

Change Vote - Soc

We need to definitely look at Mis. Either a vigilante tonight or for tomorrow's lynch.
 
Top