Willow
Assistant Moderator
- Messages
- 110,128
Thanks sweetie. lolAhh, that's separate honey.
Penalties for nothing.
But you still don't know who the video ref is.
Thanks sweetie. lolAhh, that's separate honey.
Penalties for nothing.
Buderus is a loss but with respect, Saints are without Cooper, Gasnier and Creagh. Its a question of depth.I think the Knights will play better but no with Buderus they dont have that spark and inspiration from dummy half/
I guess we blame the officials for the Houston knock on also :lol:
funny that when the shoe is the other foot, everybody starts crying foul over the decision making by the officials.
going by this current season, the Stanley try was the correct call. Consistency is the key, and even then, as he grounded the ball he still had some control of it.
The moment I saw the slomo I knew it was going to be benefit of the doubt. I agree, its a crap situation and imo not consistent enough. But that's the way it is.Hate the rule, but you're dead right - the video referee got it right according to the interpretation of the "benefit of the doubt" call being applied this season.
A Knights knock on and passing off the ground...that'll do me. Bloody ref!A non-forward pass then a missed knock on. That will do me :crazy:
We have been given no chance in this game, fair enough we have missed tackles but every dodgy call has directly lead to a Dragons try.
A Knights knock on and passing off the ground...that'll do me. Bloody ref!