09 :: R6 Sat :: Dragons 18 Knights 24 @ WIN Jubilee

[Gaba]

I would call you a dribbler Gaba but then that would be much to unkind to the dribbler community.

Time to pack it in son, you have already proven what a pathetic loser you are and have confirmed that you really are without a clue.

I thought you knights fan missed me, havent said anything about the knights for a while.

Been too busy with the sharks and roosters

 

[mozza91]

your teams isnt better just face it, with players like brain snapping rogers and the main player gidley without him the knights would be no good , the knights cant shake the one man team first it johns, then buderus now gidley

You know they're desperate when they make unfounded allegations.
The better team won.

 

[voltron]

The knights had the better attack then the dragons and only won by 6 ?

what does it say for the knights, suppose you can say the knights defense is so ordinary its the bulldogs of 2008

of course we had the better attack
we scored 24 points
and the dragons scored 18
24 is greater than 18
therefore knights had the better attack

 

[Jobdog]

Simple maths isn't his strong point ...

 

[Gaba]

the only way knights made ground was piggyback penalties 3 of the knights 4 trys came off them, otherwise the knights would never got near the tryline

 

[Gaba]

of course we had the better attack
we scored 24 points
and the dragons scored 18
24 is greater than 18
therefore knights had the better attack

If the dragons had no attack then it was pretty poor defense from the knights to let the dragons score 18 points and only lose by 6 points



The knights attack was only made better due to the piggyback penalties the knights got to get close to the tryline to score, otherwise the knights would have struggled

 

[kia ora storm]

if you mean my true colours equals -

* that i'm sarcastic

* think Greg Inglis wears too much hair product

* think alot of Storm fans (including you) are masssive wankers?

yep, they are my true colours

Thanks for the compliment...your anti-storm sentiment and pathetic comments about GI sum it up really.

 

[Pika]

Penalty count was pretty close old mate.

If the penalties the dragons received did not result in tries, that is either a problem with your attack or a credit to knights defence.

 

[Joker's Wild]

the only way knights made ground was piggyback penalties 3 of the knights 4 trys came off them, otherwise the knights would never got near the tryline

So it was the Dragons poor dicipline and the Knights ability to capitalise that won them the game aye. :crazy:

Pull your head out of your arse

 

[voltron]

If the dragons had no attack then it was pretty poor defense from the knights to let the dragons score 18 points and only lose by 6 points



The knights attack was only made better due to the piggyback penalties the knights got to get close to the tryline to score, otherwise the knights would have struggled

i didnt say that they had NO attack
i said the knights had BETTER attack
hence 24>18
but then again we must have better defense
because 18<24
either way
we won

but yeah i think it was a combination of our superior attack and defense that won us the game
and our ability to capitalise on dragon mistakes (penalties)
and not allow our mistakes (penalties) turn into points

 

[Apey]

lol stop wasting time with Gaba :crazy:

 

[Jobdog]

:lol: how many trys did the knights scored from the refs help with penalties,

the only way knights made ground was piggyback penalties 3 of the knights 4 trys came off them, otherwise the knights would never got near the tryline

The knights attack was only made better due to the piggyback penalties the knights got to get close to the tryline to score, otherwise the knights would have struggled

:lol: :lol: Is anyone else seeing a pattern here? That's all after this gem:

Im not blaming the referees, where have i blamed them

 

[Liam]

So Gaba, if only piggyback penalties got us out of our own half then how come the Dragons only made 18 more metres with 1 more penalty, 2 more completed sets and 50-50 possesion?

 

[Gaba]

:lol: :lol: Is anyone else seeing a pattern here? That's all after this gem:

Where have i blamed the ref though, have i said those penalties werent warranted no, i just commented the knights were given piggy back penalties

 

[Gaba]

So Gaba, if only piggyback penalties got us out of our own half then how come the Dragons only made 18 more metres with 1 more penalty, 2 more completed sets and 50-50 possesion?

The dragons penalties were in the knights half

 

[Jobdog]

The dragons penalties were in the knights half

:lol: Penalties are a part of the game you imbo.

 

[Gaba]

:lol: Penalties are a part of the game you imbo.

:lol: it shows the dragons were able to make ground into the knights half, where the knights couldnt make much ground without the penalty, and they are supposedly ot be the better attacking side :lol:

 

[Jobdog]

:lol: it shows the dragons were able to make ground into the knights half, where the knights couldnt make much ground without the penalty, and they are supposedly ot be the better attacking side :lol:

So, the Dragons made ground into the Knights half, yet couldn't convert that into points. Doesn't that further back up my theory the Dragons don't have much when it comes to attack?

Oh and also, the Knights ARE the better attacking side. They scored 24, the Dragons scored 18. Surely even you can see that 24 is more than 18.

 

[t1tan]

DAMN YOU NEWCASTLE!!

I would have picked 8 from 8...

 

[God-King Dean]

Surely even you can see that 24 is more than 18.

You're a liar.