What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'10 | Rivalry R19 | Sun | Roosters 36-32 Bulldogs | SFS

Result: Roosters v Bulldogs


  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .

Dr Crane

Live Update Team
Messages
19,531
but they dont stand up against the better teams , its mainly carney who does all the attacking .

Which against good defensive teams doesnt work
they stand up fine against the better teams, it's the spastics they suck against.
 

kay

Juniors
Messages
121
good fightback roosters. Disappointing finish from dogs, playing to the scoreboard. Moore thought the game was all wrapped up from what I saw of his press conference. Stunned with decision to take off barba with 10 to go, especially defending not much of a lead and roosters with momentum. Tough second year of coaching. Decision to play green instead of barba midway through te season, despite barba's impact was shown up when barba started igniting them few weeks ago.
 

DogEEL

Juniors
Messages
155
damn the dogs choked big time. why take barba off, idiot coach.

the roosters should have won by a lot more with the amount of ball they had. pearce is way over rated.

old clown kimmorley cost them the game taking the guy out when he didn't have to & that idiot neumen let in at least 2 tries. can't defend for sh*t.
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,971
Bulldogs never, ever should have been in a position to win that game. The Roosters were robbed tries by the f**king idiots (what I really think about them will get me a banning) in pink on three occasions.

sorry to sound like skeepe, but it was woeful.

One of the gutsiests wins i've seen in a long while
 

innsaneink

Referee
Messages
29,384
Justice was done....refs almost f**ked up the game of the year, Roosters deserved to win.
Badger had a shocker today looked like he'd backed the dogs,...Anasta has got a very good footy brain....I hope the dogs are gone cause they would prove more a thorn in the semis for those that make it as opposed to the roosters imo.
 

fourplay

Juniors
Messages
2,237
Anyone else see the knock on in roosters last set on about the 2nd or 3rd tackle at the 40m line? It was passed straight into the centre and bounced off him half a metre forward before the winger picked it up again and the refs let it go.
 

BeeeeeRad

Juniors
Messages
1,231
Anyone else see the knock on in roosters last set on about the 2nd or 3rd tackle at the 40m line? It was passed straight into the centre and bounced off him half a metre forward before the winger picked it up again and the refs let it go.

I know, what an absolute joke. The Dogs were ripped off badly and definantly deserved to win.:sarcasm:
 

Tipster

Bench
Messages
2,597
I thought the officiating in the Panthers/Warriors game last Sunday was a new season low, this one takes the cake.
 

fourplay

Juniors
Messages
2,237
I know, what an absolute joke. The Dogs were ripped off badly and definantly deserved to win.:sarcasm:

Just saying it wasn't like all the bad decisions were one way seeing as roosters scored their match winning try from a knock on.
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
It wasnt a knock on as it didnt come off of FPN's hands. It hit him on the body as he got in the way basically...

But if it was a knock on then we're now only owed about 5 decisions the next time we meet.
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,006
Correct fourplay, it did go forward, but I imagine it was probably a square up.

Being fair, there was only one call the Roosters fans have a right to be filthy on and that's the forward pass one.

Anyone bitching about the Anasta no-try needs to consult a rule book.
 

ByRd

First Grade
Messages
5,937
Well done to the Roosters, spewing we let that game go but they deserved the win in the end.
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,006
You haven't contested the Anasta no-try as you've been vehemently opposing elsewhere on the board... do you now accept it was the correct call?
 

Dr Crane

Live Update Team
Messages
19,531
at what point did the ball go from anasta to hit kimmorley? there's no doubt anasta didn't have control of the ball the entire time, but he still recovered it before it hit kimmorley or the ground.
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,006
at what point did the ball go from anasta to hit kimmorley? there's no doubt anasta didn't have control of the ball the entire time, but he still recovered it before it hit kimmorley or the ground.
The ball came from Kimmorleys grasp (knock on Bulldogs) into Anasta, who lost the ball into Kimmorley (knock on Roosters, therefore both ways).

He didn't recover it before it hit Noddy, it was not in his hands until just after it hit Noddy's face. It was no try by the rule book.

And even then... the Roosters still f**king won.
 

Latest posts

Top