Under the laws, a penalty can be giving for taking out someone who is trying to recover a ball that they have lost, the penalty overruling the knock on. That part of the decision is fine.
However, if a player is juggling the ball, they are considered to be in possession, therefore Hodges was available to be tackled under the laws of the game, which is what makes that decision completely and utterly wrong.
?When there is a minor breach, i.e., a knock on, the non offending team
has the opportunity to take an advantage. Upon a second breach
being committed by the hitherto non offending side, all bets are off and
play must cease. If a major breach is committed by the hitherto non
offending team, a penalty shall be awarded against them. Although
the first team committed a minor breach, they are allowed to force a
scrum by gaining possession. If the hitherto non offending team belts a
player, or tackles a player without the ball to prevent him gaining
possession, or is adjudged offside or any other penalizable
breach........he is penalized because play is still proceeding. They are
not entitled to carte blanche.?
Hitherto is defined in the Concise Oxford Dictionary as ?up to this
time?. You won?t find it in the Laws of the Game.
NZ ahead 18-6 if this game is refereed correctly.
think that should read shame the refs and video refs have some money on the Australians to winShame the Kiwis don't have a full strength side, they'd be up 30-6