ceagle
Bench
- Messages
- 4,853
Why shouldn't we have had the ball?They didn't help- especially when Manly shouldn't have even had the ball for the last set- fair to say they did COST Parra!
Why shouldn't we have had the ball?They didn't help- especially when Manly shouldn't have even had the ball for the last set- fair to say they did COST Parra!
It was still a high shot thoughEven though instead of having a drop out, Manly had the ball and eventually score off it?
They didn't help- especially when Manly shouldn't have even had the ball for the last set- fair to say they did COST Parra!
It was still a high shot though
I'm pretty sure the refs have the ability to review calls when the ball is grounded and Buhrer disputed that DCE only grounded the ball because he was taken high which was the case.No disputing it was a high shot. It was the way it was called that is annoying.
Why shouldn't we have had the ball?
Didn't really notice that, would have to look at it again.Tackled a player without the ball, penalty every day of the week. Hardly a surprise at Brookvale where there are always dubious officiating!
Parra were up Manly's end with like 3 min to go,just needed a repeat set and we got dis,choked.
Fair debut by Satini.
Think it was Hayne both timesHe threw down some of the Parramatta players quite heavily. One time by himself and the other with Glenn Stewart's assistance.
Didn't really notice that, would have to look at it again.
Mentioned on the radio and confirmed again. As I said, the officiating didn't cost them so to speak, but it didn't help. Manly still might have won the game. Just a bit dodgy though. That said can't be more full of praise for Manly, they really are down on troops and they continue to try their best. Thought DCE was average today and they still found a way to win!