What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'16 | R9 | Sat | SYD 38-0 NEW | Allianz

Round 9: Roosters v Knights


  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
32,228
Firstly the markers aren't allowed to dive on the ball and secondly, the reason it wasn't picked up by a Roosters player is because a f**king Knight was lying in the ruck you stupid f**king genius. Just because your shit team lost.

That was fair try unscrupulous it was just bad defensive read
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
46,542
Firstly the markers aren't allowed to dive on the ball and secondly, the reason it wasn't picked up by a Roosters player is because a f**king Knight was lying in the ruck you stupid f**king genius. Just because your shit team lost.

Why can't the markers dive on the ball? It was in play, if the Roosters can't get a dummy half there that's their problem.
 

Noname36

First Grade
Messages
7,067
I dare say they are trying as hard as they can. Between an average age of 19 and the ref doing his best to appease Robbo, we're not likely to offer much.

They've tried their guts out every week - which makes the whole thing even sadder.
 

I Bleed Maroon

Referee
Messages
25,922
Newcastle's attack is just the worst in the comp. They couldn't score in the Hunter Valley band camp full of horny teenage girls
 

Misanthrope

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
47,604
They've tried their guts out every week - which makes the whole thing even sadder.

It would be good if their version of trying didn't also involve atrocious handling, terrible last tackle options, and continuous stupid penalties.
 
Top