The Mad Hatter
Coach
- Messages
- 14,731
The Aussie appeal was sheepish too.
No point having the tech really.
Might as well have me out there umping.
No point having the tech really.
Might as well have me out there umping.
Yeah Smith hardly appealed, he is usually the best indicator.The Aussie appeal was sheepish too.
No point having the tech really.
Might as well have me out there umping.
I really don't understand how the 3rd umpire justified his decision by saying he found no evidence that he did NOT hit the ball.
Um, isn't lack of hot spot AND no snicko spikes enough evidence.
That justification just boggles my mind.
I am confused.
The Aussie appeal was sheepish too.
No point having the tech really.
Might as well have me out there umping.
Nigel Llong wasn't it that time? Now that was a horrid decision.Last time we were in Australia a clear hot spot wasn't enough for a wicket. This tour you don't even need hint of a spot. Both decisions in favour of Australia of course.
Yeah Smith hardly appealed, he is usually the best indicator.