What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2016 R16 - FRI - Panthers 28-26 Souths @ Pepper

Round 16: Panthers v Rabbitohs


  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .

Vic Mackey

Referee
Messages
25,426
As it was.

DWZ took Cody out.

Cody would have scored.

SOUTHS dudded again.

The Penrith try should have been sent upstairs for obstruction.

Can't believe I'm saying but I agree with r20 (to an extent)

I don't think it's a penalty try but that's a penalty to Souths every day of the week

Maybe they've changed the rule as they seem to every week but Cartwright ran behind peachey (even though oeachey had gone through the defensive line) so it's a black and white Shepard. The Tigers had a match winning try against the raiders taken off them last year when Farah ran behind Galloway, even though Galloway had run through the defensive line and not obstructed anyone.
 

Rabbits20

Immortal
Messages
42,055
Cody wouldn't have scored. If they thought he could have it would have been a penalty. At no time did DWZ change his path, he was beaten for pace by Walker but he never changed his angle and is entitled to go for the ball.

There was no obstruction, Yeo ran straight through the line.

Remove the tin hat

Yes he did.

He pushed him off the ball. As clear as anything I've seen all season as was your try which was an obstruction.

You are getting good calls.

Imagine if SOUTHS got those good calls, this place would go into meltdown.

Listen to the experts on Ch 9 too. It's obvious.

I'm not going to argue. You guys are getting all the calls.
 

Rabbits20

Immortal
Messages
42,055
Can't believe I'm saying but I agree with r20 (to an extent)

I don't think it's a penalty try but that's a penalty to Souths every day of the week

Maybe they've changed the rule as they seem to every week but Cartwright ran behind peachey (even though oeachey had gone through the defensive line) so it's a black and white Shepard. The Tigers had a match winning try against the raiders taken off them last year when Farah ran behind Galloway, even though Galloway had run through the defensive line and not obstructed anyone.

At least a penalty is Correctamundo Vic.

We aren't getting those calls Vic.

It's hard to win when this happens.

I'm proud of SOUTHS tonight. Regardless of the result they are putting in.
 

Exsilium

Coach
Messages
10,343
Yes he did.

He pushed him off the ball. As clear as anything I've seen all season as was your try which was an obstruction.

You are getting good calls.

Imagine if SOUTHS got those good calls, this place would go into meltdown.

Listen to the experts on Ch 9 too. It's obvious.

I'm not going to argue. You guys are getting all the calls.

You almost had me convinced until you put channel 9 and expert in the same sentence
 

Vic Mackey

Referee
Messages
25,426
Who did Peachey impede?

No one, but that didn't help the Tigers last year.

Like I said maybe they've changed the rule and if they have its totally sweet (and to me the way the rule should be). But the Tigers had a try taken off them because you aren't allowed to run behind your player, if if he's 15ms away.
 

Card Shark

Immortal
Messages
32,237
Calm down '20.

It was a penalty but never ever a penalty try!

Only would've given it if ball was on the ground stopped about 1m to the outside. He wasnt certain of scoring.
 

Card Shark

Immortal
Messages
32,237
You almost had me convinced until you put channel 9 and expert in the same sentence

It's a bit like that.

After we've been dudded by channel 9 today with no games on FTA in the last 6 weeks of the comp & no Friday nights all year, I've switched to Fox....f**k 9!!!!!
 

Latest posts

Top