2016 R19 - Sea Eagles 15-14* Warriors @ nib Stadium

[Meth]

Don't talk to me boy. Go watch the replay. I have. It's stronger than both our words.

lol

I've watched the replay 4 x

I win

 

[Leber]

What Lisone did. Set up for the droppie.

So your saying that Johnson should have settled and set up someone for the droppie? Well he did that.

Cool

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

lol

I've watched the replay 4 x

I win

You win "under NO circumstances SJ should run it on the fourth tackle" - Meth.

 

[Leber]

lol

I've watched the replay 4 x

I win

No I win because I use CAPITAL letters in my ARGUMENTS so I am the WINNER

 

[Meth]

You win "under NO circumstances SJ should run it on the fourth tackle" - Meth.

you're blatantly misquoting me, but whatever...

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

No I win because I use CAPITAL letters in my ARGUMENTS so I am the WINNER

Nah that's all from me. Agree to disagree.

We ALL lost.

 

[Leber]

No your momma is lol. Nah that's all from me. Agree to disagree.

We ALL lost.

No, your FACE lost.

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

Johnson received the ball, but he had options. He shouldn't be running the ball on tackle 4 under those circumstances, under any circumstances.

We lost boys. You lost, I lost, we lost to the better team.

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

No, your FACE lost.

Don't get angry mate. We'll win next time.

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

I did. And I saw lisone pass it to Johnson, and Johnson pass it to nobody.

Yeah Lisone the prop hitting up hard like Moa. Oh no, he's a passing prop.

Usually you see props hitting it up close to the posts for their halves to take the snap shot. You seen props do that for their halves before? Yes or no.

 

[Leber]

Yeah Lisone the prop hitting up hard like Moa. Oh no, he's a passing prop.

Usually you see props hitting it up close to the posts for their halves to take the snap shot. You seen props do that for their halves before? Yes or no.

Thought you were leaving but since you asked...

you are creating a straw man argument. Irrespective of who did what, Johnson is the half, it is his directive as to where the play goes. He had the ball on the 4th.

He should have passed but he didn't. He got tackled and since mcfaderp kept Lolohea off, there wasn't another suitable option for a kick, lisone recieved it under pressure and took a snap.

You keep saying 'lisone shouldn't have passed' but that isn't the point. He did. And he passed to a playmaker whose job is to 'make play'. The issue here isn't "lisone passing when he should have settled", the issue is "Johnson shouldn't have gotten himself tackled on the 4th.

You keep harping on about lisone passing when that's creating a straw man argument.

Go watch the replay again and I'm sure you will get it

 

[vvvrulz]

Pointless to argue lads

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

Thought you were leaving but since you asked...

you are creating a straw man argument. Irrespective of who did what, Johnson is the half, it is his directive as to where the play goes. He had the ball on the 4th.

He should have passed but he didn't. He got tackled and since mcfaderp kept Lolohea off, there wasn't another suitable option for a kick, lisone recieved it under pressure and took a snap.

You keep saying 'lisone shouldn't have passed' but that isn't the point. He did. And he passed to a playmaker whose job is to 'make play'. The issue here isn't "lisone passing when he should have settled", the issue is "Johnson shouldn't have gotten himself tackled on the 4th.

You keep harping on about lisone passing when that's creating a straw man argument.

Go watch the replay again and I'm sure you will get it

Oh using my lines are we lol.

Yes or no question but when avoided..well we know what that means.

I see what your saying about a straw man arguement. Like I said we'll have to agree to disagree.

If you got some questions for me, Im not scared to answer them.

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

Pointless to argue lads

Lol always quick to jump in to a dispute with me in it. Relax it doesnt concern you.

Good to hear from you old friend

 

[Leber]

Oh using my lines are we lol.

Yes or no question but when avoided..well we know what that means.
.

And that's exactly my point. I've asked you twice now, 'what should Johnson have done when receiving the ball on the 4th'.

Instead on answering it, you keep blaming lisone for giving the ball to him.

Lisone shouldn't have passed it, Johnson should have passed it when he hit it. It's pretty simple.

 

[Meth]

We lost boys. You lost, I lost, we lost to the better team.

Don't run in on those circumstances under any circumstances....meaning you can run in under some circumstances, but not when you are in those circumstances.

You aren't that smart, are you?

 

[Meth]

You're interpreting the sentence as if I said 'Johnson shouldn't run in on tackle 4 under any circumstances'...but that wasn't what I said, was it old mate?

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

You're interpreting the sentence as if I said 'Johnson shouldn't run in on tackle 4 under any circumstances'...but that wasn't what I said, was it old mate?

You did say "under any circumstances" lol. I know what you mean though. Im just toying with you lol. Ill take it down but next time dont start the monkey business with the 'oh I saw the replay, Im correct'. I know what you meant Methy!!

 

[Meth]

You did say "under any circumstances" lol. I know what you mean though. Im just toying with you lol. Ill take it down but next time dont start the monkey business with the 'oh I saw the replay, Im correct'. I know what you meant Methy!!

Disputing the phrasing of the quote doesn't work when you have the quote in your signature you turkey.

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

Disputing the phrasing of the quote doesn't work when you have the quote in your signature you turkey.

Oh calm down. You getting too angry lol. Insults are sign of anger mr under ANY circumstances.