The Raiders could win ten thousand spoons in a row (not outside the realms of possibility) and it wouldn't change the fact what Munster did is a textbook example of an act that is punished by the sin bin.
That is a good rule. It should be used more often because the amount of professional fouls in the game is a blight upon the code.
Sia also should have been sent off but again two different situations. Just because the ref bottles it in one doesn't mean he should bottle it in the other
I'm not disputing the Munster sin bin.
I'm disputing the high shot
It should've been a send off
If a f**king hold down warrants a sin bin then surely a blatant late high shot that puts a bloke on a medi cab, out cold should be at least equal to a send off.
What part of the replay do the bunker need to investigate?
It was about as atrocious as it gets.