2017 R25 Sat - Sharks 14-16 Roosters @ SC Group

[Pugzley]

Ah yes of course, double dipping.




???????????

He went in for another tackle when the ref has yelled held and the tackle has been completed.

 

[shear_joy9]

No wonder the sharks don't care if Maloney leaves

 

[Unscrupulous]

He went in for another tackle when the ref has yelled held and the tackle has been completed.

Nothing of the sort occurred in the play that the penalty was blown. Just rewatched it.

 

[TheFrog]

Sharks don't look like a top 4 side at this point.

 

[Vic Mackey]

Is this really 3rd v 4th?

Just give the storm the title now

 

[shear_joy9]

Sharks don't look like a top 4 side at this point.

Barely top 8

 

[TheFrog]

Just give the storm the title now

I bet you wouldn't say that if your mob was still in the running.

 

[Vic Mackey]

I bet you wouldn't say that if your mob was still in the running.

Well if we hadn't of beaten anyone above 7th all year I probably would

 

[Clifferd]

Even the tigers could match it with the rorters

Tigers > Sharks

 

[TheFrog]

Well if we hadn't of beaten anyone above 7th all year I probably would

Wests were coming 2nd when we beat them in round 2.

 

[Vic Mackey]

Wests were coming 2nd when we beat them in round 2.

You've sure got me there

Either way it appears you and I have very different definitions of 'in the running'

 

[Sphagnum]

Mitchell Pearce showing off his awesome kicking game tonight.

 

[Unscrupulous]

God I love this insufficient evidence rule. Can't think of a single instance we've been the benefactor of said rule this year. Been f**ked by it plenty though.

 

[Unscrupulous]

Cheers for that Jake

 

[Sphagnum]

One of the interview questions for the NSW coaching job needs to be

'what do you think of Mitchell Pearce?'

If the response is positive, put a line through their name.

 

[Vic Mackey]

One thing I've never understood

A player throws a terrible pass with no pressure on him which results in a turn over. The opposition run around high fiving like they've created the mistake.

 

[Vic Mackey]

God I love this insufficient evidence rule. Can't think of a single instance we've been the benefactor of said rule this year. Been f**ked by it plenty though.

Surely the fact that JWH is somehow on the field means we can go one game thread without roosters fans bitching about the refs?

 

[wibble]

Graham out is a massive loss for us. We don't look great, but need him to get back in it.

 

[simmo05]

God I love this insufficient evidence rule. Can't think of a single instance we've been the benefactor of said rule this year. Been f**ked by it plenty though.

Insufficient evidence JWH deliberately elbows lolo in the face, free to play? GTFO

 

[wibble]

He went in for another tackle when the ref has yelled held and the tackle has been completed.

Maloney claimed he didn't hear, and that may be true from where he was running, but probably he did but took the chanced to slow the play. I'm not sure it should have been called held though, player was on their feet, and still moving, even though the ball seemed wrapped up. Roosters would have felt ripped if the player got an offload then on our retreating defensive line and it was called back, with how poorly wrapped up the attacker was.