2017 R7 Sat - Raiders 20-8 Warriors @ GIO

[RWB]

Such a bad call... if you are going to override the pocket ref, make sure you're 100%

 

[beave]

There has to be some onus on the ball carrier. Sure Hodgson made contact with the ball but it was the lightest of light touches, clearly a loose carry.

Keep on Skeeping on.

You'd be blowing up like KimJong Un at a sizzler if that was the other way around.

 

[AlwaysGreen]

Paulo, Boyd, Gavet and Lillyman have all been great tonight

 

[Vee]

Shaun Johnson,hang your head in shame mate.

 

[Front-Rower]

We need just one ref if they're not going to listen. What's the point? Work experience?

That example was the perfect example of how the two ref system should work. One controls the ruck the other the 10z

On this occasion the pocket ref was right there, in the ruck and saw what what happened yet a bloke 10 metres says that it didn't happen, nothing to see here.

 

[skeepe]

Such a bad call... if you are going to override the pocket ref, make sure you're 100%

You talking about the high tackle on Boyd? I agree.

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

Yeah,cos refs always favour the visitors.

Yeah, I know what youre saying. Just annoying when it happens to your team. Not blaming the Raiders at all, never have, theyre playing great. The reffs though...

 

[AlwaysGreen]

Kata is a goose

 

[Meth]

Look, at the end of the day, the Warriors have had opportunities and not taken them. They are deservedly behind.

But the bitching and moaning and crying foul is a bit much.

 

[Puntoue]

The warriors just need to take off the shackles and unless the Aysh on that right edge.

Ayshford > Rapana + BJ

 

[skeepe]

That example was the perfect example of how the two ref system should work. One controls the ruck the other the 10z

On this occasion the pocket ref was right there, in the ruck and saw what what happened yet a bloke 10 metres says that it didn't happen, nothing to see here.

Funny how you didn't complain about the pocket ref's call of a high tackle against the Warriors being ignored.

I wonder why that is...

 

[AlwaysGreen]

Warriors still in this

 

[Front-Rower]

Funny how you didn't complain about the pocket ref's call of a high tackle against the Warriors being ignored.

I wonder why that is...

Didn't see it so can't comment

 

[Generalzod]

Evolution my friend evolution

 

[Leber]

Knew the lack of opportunities in the first half would cost us

 

[ZEROMISSTACKLES]

You talking about the high tackle on Boyd? I agree.

That tackle around the chest by Mannering wasnt a head high. Boyds tackle was head high. Warriors didnt knock it on and neither did the Raiders but they called a Warriors knock on. Have to be blind from jerking too much to miss the 2 on 1 strip. Just statin the facts. Not blamin the Raiders, no need to jump to conclusions.

 

[skeepe]

Bodene you piece of shit

 

[Vee]

That example was the perfect example of how the two ref system should work. One controls the ruck the other the 10z

On this occasion the pocket ref was right there, in the ruck and saw what what happened yet a bloke 10 metres says that it didn't happen, nothing to see here.

Not necessarily. It's okay for two refs to see things differently. If the primary ref saw it clearly, I have no problem with him overruling the other bloke.

 

[AlwaysGreen]

Nice elbow.

 

[Meth]

Oh piss off.