What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2018 Jerseys/Logos/Sponsorships

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hello, I'm The Doctor

First Grade
Messages
9,124
A humpback whale.

Titan size :heavy_check_mark:
Representative of the local area :heavy_check_mark:
Original as f**k :heavy_check_mark:

Then they can have their beloved blue as representing the water etc.

"Titans" is such a loose concept they could go just about anywhere with the logo.

Their current is one of the worst options i can think of.....
 

Hello, I'm The Doctor

First Grade
Messages
9,124
I still say if you don't like it don't buy it. But if clubs cannot get their brand out in 20 odd other maches througout the season then they should sack the front office staff and start again. Event jerseys have been popular and make money for clubs as well as gain coverage with promotional opportunities for clubs.

Not to mention fans then have a choice of what they want to wear. I used to work in a merch shop and there are fans who don't always want to wear just the home jersey they want choice.

I actually like the event jumper...

What shits me is when the club messes with the Main strip and uses what should be a dumb gimmick jumper (looking at you Cowboys).

Not even mentioning that the dumb gimmick jumpers should at least be quarantined to their dumb gimmick round and all clubs should be made to participate to at least make the dumb gimmicks consistent
 

The Great Dane

First Grade
Messages
7,960
I agree with large parts of this, particularly that this forum is a bit of an echo chamber.

However personally, I don't think I fit cleanly into the archetype you've described. I think there's a stack of iconic designs from my childhood that were ordinary that many hold dear - licorice all sorts, Henny Penny, Broncos diamonds, Cowboys original jersey, Eels late 90's designs, Sea-Eagles Pepsi design, Sharks diagonal design, most Bears jerseys except for the hoops... I even think the Raiders classic designs should have been done better. A lot of the styles I prefer are from many many years before my time as opposed to the 90's and early 2000's of my youth.

You're right it's not necessarily just nostalgia, romanticisation of prior eras is a big part of it too...

Nostalgia is a small part of my resistance to this kind of stuff its more my preference for adherence to clean design principles (which is kind of why I also like flag design). Keep the main identity clean visually (at least from a distance) and reserve the busy and (imo) gaudy designs for retro/nines/off-field applications. So its the universal principles that hold more water in my case than any individual symbol. When a subjectively ugly design gets posted here, it feels more like a missed opportunity to design something better than the fact it doesn't stick to something I grew up with.

What's subjectively ugly to you is subjectively a masterpiece to somebody else in the world... So just because you find it an ugly design doesn't mean that it is an ugly design, and if the clubs trashed every jersey that doesn't fit the narrow definitions of a good jersey on here then they'd be throwing away basically every design every created apart from an extremely select few that are kosher, and throwing away the opportunity of creating a new masterpiece.

If Van Gogh had stopped painting after only a few pieces were completed cause everybody in his time hated his paintings then the world would be without some of the greatest paintings of all time, and if the Raiders had scrapped their involvement in the Marvel jerseys because people on here and/or people with similar views thought that it was "tacky", "not traditional enough", and "doesn't fit the teams brand" as they see it, then they never would have created the first Hulk jersey which is the Raiders highest selling jersey of all time.

And I don't think this segment is as small as you make it out to be. I hear enough from the circles I associate with that agree with me, and some that don't. Most of these people have a passing interest in the topic at best and would likely fall into the category of nostalgics.

In group preference bias would completely taint the sample, let alone the fact that the sample size of your friends is insignificant.

I'd also bet that once you boil the subject down to whether or not the jersey designs turn them off supporting a club or going to games that all most all would say no it's not that much of an issue.

But their opinion is still valid, and to dismiss their opinion because it isn't consistent over the decades is not too dissimilar to how some here (including myself) have responded to others, just in the opposite direction.

Not dismissing their opinions, just pointing out why their opinions are infinitely subjective and at the end of the day not very helpful, if you don't like it that's fine don't buy it or wear it, but don't at the same time suggest that somebody who does like it and does buy it is wrong and/or stupid, not saying that you yourself have done that, but it does happen all the time especially on here, and especially when a gimmick jersey is the talking point of the time...
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,017
Not a fan of the cattledog hey, as a mascot on the field its okay for the kids but not for official branding. We used to have a cowboy riding a real horse for a mascot at the ground but they stopped doing it in the mid 2k’s. Rumours were Carl Webb ate the horse......


Well you need to eat a lot when you are busy training the house down
 

GAZF

First Grade
Messages
8,754
You're right it's not necessarily just nostalgia, romanticisation of prior eras is a big part of it too...

Again, you're implying a longing for things of the past in general is my primary reason for liking designs. I like the designs for what they are, not necessarily the era. You're still trying to jam a square peg into a round hole. There are plenty of modern examples of great design, particularly in other sports, that I wish NRL clubs would take inspiration from.

What's subjectively ugly to you is subjectively a masterpiece to somebody else in the world... So just because you find it an ugly design doesn't mean that it is an ugly design, and if the clubs trashed every jersey that doesn't fit the narrow definitions of a good jersey on here then they'd be throwing away basically every design every created apart from an extremely select few that are kosher, and throwing away the opportunity of creating a new masterpiece.

If Van Gogh had stopped painting after only a few pieces were completed cause everybody in his time hated his paintings then the world would be without some of the greatest paintings of all time, and if the Raiders had scrapped their involvement in the Marvel jerseys because people on here and/or people with similar views thought that it was "tacky", "not traditional enough", and "doesn't fit the teams brand" as they see it, then they never would have created the first Hulk jersey which is the Raiders highest selling jersey of all time.

Had you taken the word "subjective" into greater consideration over the word "ugly", it would have saved you two paragraphs of stating the obvious. If I can't have a subjective opinion on RL design in this forum then I give up.

In group preference bias would completely taint the sample, let alone the fact that the sample size of your friends is insignificant.

I'd also bet that once you boil the subject down to whether or not the jersey designs turn them off supporting a club or going to games that all most all would say no it's not that much of an issue.

Most family/friends know I do this sort of stuff but I don't usually bring it up in conversation, so its normally someone else broaching the subject. The fact that they know what I do probably skews their opinion on whether its important or not. And no, I don't think what a team wears is the deciding factor in whether most people continue to support their team. So I agree on those two points.

By that same line of thinking however, I don't think one-off promotional designs are necessarily creating new fans or increasing fan engagement to the extent that massive sale figures suggest. Sure, there's probably a decent percentage of kids that cotton onto a club as a result, but how many would have eventually done so as they were brought up in the culture (i.e. what's the net benefit)? How many of those kids would just jump to the next team that wins a premiership a few years down the track or just switch sports entirely?

@M2D2 : If you weren't already a keen RL fan, would you have jumped on a team as an adult because they released a Marvel jersey or would you have bought the jersey as a Marvel fan without significantly increasing you engagement with the sport? Would it be unreasonable to assume some adult Marvel fans would buy multiple team's jerseys because they like those superheroes but not watch or support those teams?

The main benefit of this initiative appears to be great merch sales (good for business), a bit of publicity for a couple of weeks a year (which drives merch sales) on top of some free advertising (fans walking around in Marvel gear), and the very occasional new fan. The negatives, to me, are that the club's brand is diluted and that the NRL may be perceived as willing to bend over for any brand bigger than theirs and unable to stand on its own two feet (which may drive fans and sponsors away, keep in mind that this is opinion and I don't need to be reminded as such). The benefits just don't outweigh the potential negatives in my opinion, maybe they do in the short term but not long term.

Not dismissing their opinions, just pointing out why their opinions are infinitely subjective and at the end of the day not very helpful, if you don't like it that's fine don't buy it or wear it, but don't at the same time suggest that somebody who does like it and does buy it is wrong and/or stupid, not saying that you yourself have done that, but it does happen all the time especially on here, and especially when a gimmick jersey is the talking point of the time...

I get it, people don't like to be dismissed for their opinions. I've also heard a number of times that I should shut my mouth with regards to merchandising and marketing and stick to my day job (which has nothing to do with design, by the way) so the air of exclusivity doesn't just come from the design purists but also from the other side of the fence as well. I value their opinion as they know more than I do on these subjects but it would be nice to not be shut down every time I say something wrong, just because I don't work in these fields, and rather engage me in proper discussion as you have. But its just the nature of the thread to have strong opinions and ultimately I'm glad its here otherwise I'm resigned to the even smaller echo chamber of my website and I wouldn't have as great an opportunity to be convinced to see through my own biases.
 

Saint Doc

Coach
Messages
11,098
In all of the GC iterations, i think they have never topped their original leaping giant....

It would totally fit the Titan name as well give "titans" is a fairly loose concept to play with.
22406132_1456557581064711_3846956293984850937_n.jpg

Of all your crazy ideas, I actually don’t mind this one. They definitely need a new logo, and using this one as inspiration I would not be opposed to!

(I also reckon they should take on Gold Coast-Logan on as their name for a broader appeal and a more working class branding, but thats another debate)

No
 

gzerounian

Juniors
Messages
1,094
I have admired the designs of GAZF for many years now. He has always been very meticulous and thoughtful in his creations. He is humble with his designs and when a GAZF design does appear in here, it’s usually someone else posting them rather than him bragging about it. He expresses his opinions in a respectful manner without putting other designs down, but rather, gives constructive feedback and/or reasoning.

The way he has been spoken to (attacked) in the last 24 hours has been appalling. Even so, he has still continued to remain calm, stick to the points and not make personal attacks wherever possible or use foul language.

Sorry I just needed to say this as I don’t think a simple “like” would have done it.
 

GAZF

First Grade
Messages
8,754
I have admired the designs of GAZF for many years now. He has always been very meticulous and thoughtful in his creations. He is humble with his designs and when a GAZF design does appear in here, it’s usually someone else posting them rather than him bragging about it. He expresses his opinions in a respectful manner without putting other designs down, but rather, gives constructive feedback and/or reasoning.

The way he has been spoken to (attacked) in the last 24 hours has been appalling. Even so, he has still continued to remain calm, stick to the points and not make personal attacks wherever possible or use foul language.

Sorry I just needed to say this as I don’t think a simple “like” would have done it.
To be fair, I kind of started it. It snowballed out of control from there.
 

GAZF

First Grade
Messages
8,754
Give it a chance Gaz, a bit of light entertainment never hurt anyone!
I've sat in on parts of some when my wife's watched them on Fox and I can't get into them. Probably shouldn't have called them lame since they are killing it in every direction at the moment.
 

gzerounian

Juniors
Messages
1,094
In all of the GC iterations, i think they have never topped their original leaping giant....

It would totally fit the Titan name as well give "titans" is a fairly loose concept to play with.
22406132_1456557581064711_3846956293984850937_n.jpg


(I also reckon they should take on Gold Coast-Logan on as their name for a broader appeal and a more working class branding, but thats another debate)

I love this emblem except for the mascot breaking out of the circles which seems to happen in almost every emblem these day. At the risk of sounding nostalgic, I loved the old emblems because

- they were contained into one shape (usually a circle)
- if the mascot "broke out", then they would do so within the inner circle.
- the clubs name and mascot name were clearly and neatly printed around the circle (like the giants one above)

I know that the reason these probably existed in the past was because they were restricted to actual patches. As more advanced embroidery and jersey printing has been introduced, clubs have been much more liberal and detailed with their "badges". Bulldogs, StGeorge and Parramatta have gone back to a contained emblem shape and the Manly one is nearly perfect (still has the 2 circles) except for the stupid eagle breaking out of both circles. I loved the old eagle.

Screen Shot 2018-03-01 at 9.47.50 am.png
 

M2D2

Bench
Messages
4,693
No idea GAZF, ive been following the sport as long as ive been a comic nerd.
I do know one of my mates (who is a dragons fan) kids has wanted the roosters jerseys in these years which hasnt made the dragons mate who has gotten the iron man ones happy.
 

Lambretta

First Grade
Messages
8,689
GAZF mentioned great modern design

The Wests Tigers had home and away kits in 2010 which were great modern designs.

They weren't copies of earlier jerseys but they were classic, simple jerseys and instantly recognisable as Wests.

Last year they had a cartoon Tiger with a plaster on its nose. Appropriate because they kept getting beaten up, but not good design.

More 2010, less cartoon garbage

Jersey designs do not require rocket scientists nor do they need to be replicas of 1970s jerseys every year

Clean, simple designs, without 1,000 sponsor ads f**king everything up is what fans want.

Keep the mimick jersey to 1 new design per season and put some thought into which one you want to go with
 

hellteam

First Grade
Messages
6,536
I love this emblem except for the mascot breaking out of the circles which seems to happen in almost every emblem these day. At the risk of sounding nostalgic, I loved the old emblems because

- they were contained into one shape (usually a circle)
- if the mascot "broke out", then they would do so within the inner circle.
- the clubs name and mascot name were clearly and neatly printed around the circle (like the giants one above)

I know that the reason these probably existed in the past was because they were restricted to actual patches. As more advanced embroidery and jersey printing has been introduced, clubs have been much more liberal and detailed with their "badges". Bulldogs, StGeorge and Parramatta have gone back to a contained emblem shape and the Manly one is nearly perfect (still has the 2 circles) except for the stupid eagle breaking out of both circles. I loved the old eagle.

View attachment 17900

Bring back that Roosters logo immediately. Just with Sydney Roosters on top
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top