What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2018 R10 Sun - Raiders 16-24 Sharks @ GIO

Round 10: Raiders v Sharks

  • Draw after Golden Point

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9
  • Poll closed .

David brown

Juniors
Messages
1,601
Raiders should never of lost that game and they have only themselves to blame (Mainly Seizer)... But Ben Cummins deadset needs to go, merkin is a joke..
 

wibble

Bench
Messages
4,661
Bad luck Raiders.

Much like our famous 2016 win in the finals, we came in very underdone, and Raiders lost a crucial playmaker in the first half.

I guess it means our depleted side is slightly better than theirs?

I have no doubt Raiders win that if Austin stays on, after he left they had no attack.

Gritty from the Sharks, to hang on and hang on and get over the top at the end. It is what we do.

Val Holmes the definition of rocks and diamonds in that game, but thankfully more diamonds at the end.

4 in a row with our spine and forward pack severely disrupted, I'll take that, no matter how lucky our wins.
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
48,310
The Sharks were allowed to do whatever they wanted out there, Raiders never had a chance.

That Cotric disallowed try was an absolute stitch up, and changed the game. The touch judge, who was right there, thought it was fine, but the ref who was 30 metres away at a bad angle called it forward anyway.

There needs to be an investigation.
 

Clifferd

Coach
Messages
10,805
The Sharks were allowed to do whatever they wanted out there, Raiders never had a chance.

That Cotric disallowed try was an absolute stitch up, and changed the game. The touch judge, who was right there, thought it was fine, but the ref who was 30 metres away at a bad angle called it forward anyway.

There needs to be an investigation.

Didn’t watch the game

But love you
 
Messages
17,532
The Sharks were allowed to do whatever they wanted out there, Raiders never had a chance.

That Cotric disallowed try was an absolute stitch up, and changed the game. The touch judge, who was right there, thought it was fine, but the ref who was 30 metres away at a bad angle called it forward anyway.

There needs to be an investigation.
And 47 Texers
 

MilkShark

First Grade
Messages
5,162
The Sharks were allowed to do whatever they wanted out there, Raiders never had a chance.

That Cotric disallowed try was an absolute stitch up, and changed the game. The touch judge, who was right there, thought it was fine, but the ref who was 30 metres away at a bad angle called it forward anyway.

There needs to be an investigation.
You’re kidding if you think the ball wasn’t forward.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,609
The Sharks were allowed to do whatever they wanted out there, Raiders never had a chance.

That Cotric disallowed try was an absolute stitch up, and changed the game. The touch judge, who was right there, thought it was fine, but the ref who was 30 metres away at a bad angle called it forward anyway.

There needs to be an investigation.

Most consistent LU troll by some margin
 

BWNB

First Grade
Messages
7,971
The Sharks were allowed to do whatever they wanted out there, Raiders never had a chance.

That Cotric disallowed try was an absolute stitch up, and changed the game. The touch judge, who was right there, thought it was fine, but the ref who was 30 metres away at a bad angle called it forward anyway.

There needs to be an investigation.
The one he scored after Holmes had scored? Or the was the stitch up the Feki no try?
 

Latest posts

Top