mozza91
Coach
- Messages
- 14,489
Kinky!But I'd pay big money for Sutton's address. I'd do unspeakable things to his pot plants.
Kinky!But I'd pay big money for Sutton's address. I'd do unspeakable things to his pot plants.
LOL slam dunk.
So how many weeks do we all agree Napa will get for the intentional headbut? Surely he'll be suspended to justify the call, right?
Then he went and f**ked the game by headbutting Gal's fists.Ah remember the good ol days when people used to whinge about Myles leading with head and how it should be a penalty
You should have stopped after "we are our own worst enemies". Your team didn't get rorted, they just got beaten on the day by a team that was enthusiastic and were totally clutch. This is the kind of game that you just have to take the loss and hope the team is better for it.We are our own worst enemies as usual but f**k me we got rorted. Unbelievable.
Don't play the consistency card, it should ALWAYS be ruled as such, you can't fly in like that and knock a bloke senseless and expect nothing to come of it, absolutely ridiculous the agenda you're trying to push
There's leading with your head in a normal tackle, and then there's what Napa did:
![]()
You're allowed to knock someone senseless within the rules of the game
Am I the only one that’s thinks that Napa’s tackle was illegal sure you lead with your head to make a tackle but he used his head as a weapon he aimed at Simms head and got him good.
Different story if Sims doesn’t fall into it aswell. We’re probably congratulating Napa on the good hit if he doesn’t fall into it
Pretty bullshit but in that scenario probsbly the correct call
That explains nothing.Section 16, rule 6
In the event of misconduct by a player, the Referee shall, at his discretion, caution, temporarily suspend for ten minutes, or dismiss the offender.
Section 16, rule 6
In the event of misconduct by a player, the Referee shall, at his discretion, caution, temporarily suspend for ten minutes, or dismiss the offender.
I've seen it twice,and I'm totally convinced that it was foul play. Gould thinks it wasn't,but his mate Nick will love him for that.Am I the only one that’s thinks that Napa’s tackle was illegal sure you lead with your head to make a tackle but he used his head as a weapon he aimed at Simms head and got him good.
I’m filthy with the refs but can’t argue with this. Same shit every week.The one thing no one is talking about is how many opportunities the Roosters murdered tonight. If they were even halfway competent, the game would have been over by half time.
As much as I hate the merkin, Napa deserves zero weeks.So how many weeks do we all agree Napa will get for the intentional headbut? Surely he'll be suspended to justify the call, right?