2018 R3 Sun - Roosters 38-8 Knights @ Allianz

[Unscrupulous]

I'm sorry, but how is there anything approaching certainty in that call?

The fix is in.

Please tell me you're kidding.

 

[AusKnightRKO]

That is absolute bullshit, cronk is before the line, Mitchell’s lead foot is on top of the line... absolute fkn joke

 

[mozza91]

Where was the evidence to overturn that? His foot was on the line and Cronk was behind. f**king joke.

 

[Tommy Smith]

I'm sorry, but how is there anything approaching certainty in that call?

The fix is in.

Should have been 12 nil earlier with the BS forward pass call.

How is the fix in with the 5-2 pen count and that shocker against us costing SST a try?

 

[Unscrupulous]

That is absolute bullshit, cronk is before the line, Mitchell’s lead foot is on top of the line... absolute fkn joke

It's the foot that's on the ground that counts.

 

[Uncle Kraka]

Obviously onside. Probably the same touchie that called the forward pass earlier to deny a try

 

[Noname36]

Where was the evidence to overturn that? His foot was on the line and Cronk was behind. f**king joke.

I agree but we deserved it for Moga's stupidity up the other end.

 

[beave]

That is absolute bullshit, cronk is before the line, Mitchell’s lead foot is on top of the line... absolute fkn joke

Latrells trailing leg looks slightly behind Cronks, that’s enough to be onside yeah? i can’t remember the rule intricacy these days since they changed it

 

[Vic Mackey]

I'm sorry, but how is there anything approaching certainty in that call?

The fix is in.

Mate as a neutral knights have been getting the rub of the green so far, the forward pass no try earlier wasn't even line ball

 

[Misanthrope]

Please tell me you're kidding.

Ref's call was offside. Nothing in that footage was clear enough to overturn that.

Ref's call might have been wrong, but the onus is on the video ref to definitively disprove his call. Footage was insufficient to do that with certainty.

 

[beave]

Where was the evidence to overturn that? His foot was on the line and Cronk was behind. f**king joke.

His front foot was in the air mate.

 

[wibble]

Tough one, I think he's onside but it's so close that you'd nearly have to go with the onfield calls

Yep. If you'd ask me to make a decision one way or another, I'd say onside.

If you'd ask me if I was certain he was onside, I'd say no.

Not sure what that says about the video review process, but I guess if we ask has a howler been made, we can say "no".

 

[King hit]

That’s a try just get on with it

 

[Tommy Smith]

Offside!

We wuz robbed.

 

[Unscrupulous]

Ref's call was offside. Nothing in that footage was clear enough to overturn that.

Ref's call might have been wrong, but the onus is on the video ref to definitively disprove his call. Footage was insufficient to do that with certainty.

Mate just cop the fair try. We were already robbed of one ffs.

 

[Noname36]

Mate as a neutral knights have been getting the rub of the green so far, the forward pass no try earlier wasn't even line ball

I'm a Knights fan and I agree with you.

 

[Noname36]

Interesting call...

 

[AusKnightRKO]

Like how was that a knock on?

 

[Unscrupulous]

That's a try

 

[Fufu Andronez]

Oh Ffs your in the absolute best position to make the call