- Messages
- 77,639
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
If he said it was a non-event and 2 weeks max is appropriate then i agree too
He described it as a nip or a nibble, maybe both, and mentioned category two. All the other merkins were black and white, saying you can't grade it, it's either a bite or it's not. Kent went from it being a bite to not a bite.
I agreed with him. And Kenty shouldn't go soft on her just because she's a chick.
His point is that any kind of bite is completely unacceptable in rugby league and that they need strong punishments (ie the 4 week ban) to help deter anyone from doing it in the future.
Then he should be jumping up and down about him not getting 12 weeks.
Proctor actually got 5 weeks but his clean record reduced it to 4.
Yep, less than half what Graham got. But Kent says he is fine with it.
Being suspended for a quarter of the season in any sport is a decent deterrent IMO.
Ennis is a knob. How about don’t put pressure on the neck ?
Thats fine when merkins do bad shit... but its footy and often accidents happen
