2020 R9 Fri - Rabbitohs 18-10 Wests Tigers @ Bankwest

[League Unlimited News]

NRL 2020 - Round 9
South Sydney Rabbitohs v Wests Tigers
Bankwest Stadium, Parramatta
Friday 10 July 2020

Kickoff 7:55pm - Nine/9Now, Fox League/Kayo

1. Latrell Mitchell 2. Dane Gagai 3. Campbell Graham 4. James Roberts 5. Alex Johnston 6. Cody Walker 7. Adam Reynolds 8. Tevita Tatola 9. Damien Cook 10. Thomas Burgess 11. Jaydn Su'A 12. Ethan Lowe 13. Cameron Murray
Interchange: 14. Liam Knight 15. Bayley Sironen 16. Patrick Mago 17. Hame Sele 18. Mark Nicholls 19. Steven Marsters 20. Troy Dargan 21. Corey Allan

1. Adam Doueihi 2. David Nofoaluma 3. Michael Chee-Kam 4. Moses Mbye 5. Tommy Talau 6. Josh Reynolds 7. Luke Brooks 8. Josh Aloiai 9. Harry Grant 10. Oliver Clark 11. Luke Garner 12. Luciano Leilua 13. Matt Eisenhuth
Interchange: 14. Elijah Taylor 15. Thomas Mikaele 16. Sam McIntyre 17. Chris Lawrence 18. Benji Marshall 19. Reece Hoffman 20. Billy Walters 21. Russell Packer

Referees: Ben Cummins
Sideline Officials: Tim Alouani-Roby, Jon Stone
Video Referees: Steve Chiddy, Bryan Norrie

​

 

[The unknown]

Can’t see us winning this...that penrith game cost us big time

Twal, Musgrove, Both Leulias and possibly McIntyre and Mbye out aswell.

Just as we were starting to hit a bit of form the footy gods f**k us over.

 

[Rodney Rude]

Souths in a close one

 

[The_Frog]

Can’t see us winning this...that penrith game cost us big time

Twal, Musgrove, Both Leulias and possibly McIntyre and Mbye out aswell.

Just as we were starting to hit a bit of form the footy gods f**k us over.

You'll appreciate the drop in standard of the opposition forwards this time, although they've got an abundance of flair in the halves and outside backs. They've been dining out on the bottom 4 all season, if Wests play like they did yesterday they'll beat 'em.

 

[The unknown]

You'll appreciate the drop in standard of the opposition forwards this time, although they've got an abundance of flair in the halves and outside backs. They've been dining out on the bottom 4 all season, if Wests play like they did yesterday they'll beat 'em.

Step down in class sure but we will most likely be missing a few from that game. That and Latrell normally saves his best games for against us

 

[GongPanther]

Rabbits should win with the Tiges injury setbacks 28-16.

 

[mxlegend99]

Tigers are a better team but down on troops. I give them a chance still but realistically those missing players will be enough to get Souths home. I think Tigers will be in it til the end though.

 

[Silent Knight]

The Battle for Ninff. I'll go Tiggers by two.

 

[Dragon Slayer]

Two very undesirable fan bases come to together.

The Best Boo fans Souffs with their notable distinction of only possessing half of their teeth.

&

The Tiger X Magpie Mongrel Breed of misfits that roam around NSW with no true home.

On the field it gets worse with Souffs crying quartet of Latrell Mitchell, James Roberts, Dane Gagai & Cody Walker sooking it up on and off the field.

Whilst the Tigpies players just look shyte, play shyte and are shyte.

Souffs by 1 missing tooth because the Tigpies are down one shytehead in BJ Leilua.

 

[Perth Tiger]

You'll appreciate the drop in standard of the opposition forwards this time, although they've got an abundance of flair in the halves and outside backs. They've been dining out on the bottom 4 all season, if Wests play like they did yesterday they'll beat 'em.

A set down in class usual means we also step down in intensity (see titans game). This will be an indication if Madge is having any affect in turning around this club because if we play to the same standard as we did against you guys we should win

 

[Vic Mackey]

If both play to form we should win, even with our outs

Souths struggled to beat the last placed team who were missing their best player, we went toe to toe with second in a high quality game whilst in the second half enduring a 7-0 penalty count and 4-1 6 agains (our 1 was with 30 seconds to go)

We actually had more line breaks then the Panthers despite having 9 less sets

If we can finally go 80 mins without losing a player to injury, make the most of our opportunities and get a few 50/50 calls then We should get the 2 points here.

 

[2 weeks]

Teams will be competing for The Craig Field Shield

 

[Galeforce]

If both play to form we should win, even with our outs

Souths struggled to beat the last placed team who were missing their best player, we went toe to toe with second in a high quality game whilst in the second half enduring a 7-0 penalty count and 4-1 6 agains (our 1 was with 30 seconds to go)

We actually had more line breaks then the Panthers despite having 9 less sets

If we can finally go 80 mins without losing a player to injury, make the most of our opportunities and get a few 50/50 calls then We should get the 2 points here.

Souths have beaten themselves with all their losses this year. Errors in possession

Souths could have won all their games this year.......and even their wins have room for improvement from the side.

In short , if Souths play to their potential , they win by 30.

 

[yobbo84]

Well, we've named what I believe is our full strength 17. No excuses. We've lost plenty to the Tigers before that we should've won though. Except for last year, games between our two teams don't tend to be close ones. Someone usually blows the other team away, and not always the one you expect.

 

[Vic Mackey]

In short , if Souths play to their potential , they win by 30.

I don’t think they win by 30 but yes on paper souths certainly are stronger. They appear to be full strength whereas the Tigers have at least 5 missing from the full strength 17.

Luckily though games aren’t won on paper

 

[Rhino_NQ]

Tigers by 10 because f*#k you R20

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Souths have beaten themselves with all their losses this year. Errors in possession

Souths could have won all their games this year.......and even their wins have room for improvement from the side.

In short , if Souths play to their potential , they win by 30.

Ah, the old 'others teams never beat us, we only lost because of ourselves' routine.

 

[Vic Mackey]

Ah, the old 'others teams never beat us, we only lost because of ourselves' routine.

if the Bulldogs never missed a tackle or dropped a ball they’d be coming first

 

[Galeforce]

I don’t think they win by 30 but yes on paper souths certainly are stronger. They appear to be full strength whereas the Tigers have at least 5 missing from the full strength 17.

Luckily though games aren’t won on paper

I wasn't thinking based on paper , though I agree , Souths on paper look stronger.

Fact is , tigers have been playing well and i do not think they have much more to give and their ltd record is 4 and 4. Souths have not been playing to their potential , their ball control for starters has been poor at key moments of the the games they have lost.Yet their record is also 4 and 4 , and includes Roosters , Storm and Panthers and early season Broncos.SOuths have plenty of room for improvement and if they just get their ball control improved , I think the can come home strong towards the end of this season.

 

[simmo05]

Tigers by 10 because f*#k you R20

Where is that dunce?