2023 R4 Fri - Melbourne 24-12 Wests Tigers @ AAMI

[League Unlimited News]

NRL 2023 - Round 4
Melbourne Storm v Wests Tigers
AAMI Park, Melbourne, Melbourne (TICKETS)
Friday 24 March 2023

Gates 5pm / NRL kickoff 6:00pm, broadcast live on Fox League & Kayo Sports

1. Nick Meaney 2. William Warbrick 3. Reimis Smith 4. Justin Olam 5. Xavier Coates 6. Cameron Munster 7. Jahrome Hughes 8. Tui Kamikamica 9. Harry Grant 10. Christian Welch 11. Trent Loiero 12. Eliesa Katoa 13. Josh King 14. Tyran Wishart 15. Alec MacDonald 16. Tariq Sims 17. Bronson Garlick 18. Tom Eisenhuth 19. Grant Anderson 20. Aaron Pene 21. Sualauvi Faalogo 22. Jonah Pezet

1. Adam Doueihi 2. Charlie Staines 3. Brent Naden 4. Asu Kepaoa 5. Junior Tupou 6. Brandon Wakeham 7. Luke Brooks 8. Stefano Utoikamanu 9. Apisai Koroisau 10. David Klemmer 11. Isaiah Papali'i 12. John Bateman 13. Fonua Pole 14. Daine Laurie 15. Alex Twal 16. Shawn Blore 17. Alex Seyfarth 18. Starford To'a 19. Joe Ofahengaue 20. Justin Matamua 21. David Nofoaluma 22. Jake Simpkin

Referee: Ben Cummins
Sideline Officials: Matt Noyen, Darian Furner
Video Referee: Grant Atkins

LOWER GRADES:
PNG v Brisbane^ at Port Moresby, Sat - QLD Cup 4pm AEDT
Sunshine Coast^ BYE

Melbourne^ v Wests Tigers^ at Comely Banks, Sat - Flegg 2pm
Western Subs^ v Norths at Lidcombe, Sat - NSW Cup 3pm​

 

[JamesRustle]

Dare I say it... crip fight. Tigers to beat storm in whacky fashion.

 

[This Year?]

If the Tigers win I will buy a sticker membership.
Go tigers!

 

[Vic Mackey]

We’re going to lose to a team with a halves pairing of Nick Meaney and Tyran Wishart aren’t we

 

[Valheru]

I'm going to give Melbourne another chance. If they lose this then the empire might actually be crumbling.

 

[Marshall_magic]

Melbourne always win in round 1 but have they ever been 1-3? Probably not and this year will be no different.

 

[greenBV4]

We’re going to lose to a team with a halves pairing of Nick Meaney and Tyran Wishart aren’t we

Gods I hope so

So much for our easy run to start the season..

 

[greenBV4]

I'm going to give Melbourne another chance. If they lose this then the empire might actually be crumbling.

I could make excuses all day about injuries being the cause, but in reality it's clear as day we've lost our depth, even throughout the big 3 era one of our biggests strengths was depth and next man up mentality

 

[I Bleed Maroon]

The entire Rugby League world needs to be right behind Wests for this one. Give them your energy!

 

[GongPanther]

Munster back vastly improves the Storm. 36-6 Storm.

 

[greenBV4]

Munster back vastly improves the Storm. 36-6 Storm.

Very surprised by the named team
Wouldn't be shocked if a few drop off before game day

 

[Exsilium]

If the Tigers win, Brooks gets extended and a condition of his contract will be that he cannot be dropped for the lifetime of his contract.

Kinda like now but at least it will be on paper.

 

[Someone2]

Storm by 26

 

[This Year?]

The entire Rugby League world needs to be right behind Wests for this one. Give them your energy!

Last time I gave someone white blobs I got called disgusting.

 

[PANTHERMIKE]

Tigers will win this

 

[Someguy]

Can the storm have nofu back if he is not good enough for the tigers?

Storm defence is very leaky this season, tigers might just get the win but I really question why tigers best player has been moved out of position for a journeyman half that has never looked anymore than a decent backup.

with Hughes out Pezet gets a big chance to earn himself a contract, looked ok last week and I think he will be a better player alongside Munster than he is teamed with Hughes

 

[Rhino_NQ]

Storm won't have to be at 100% to win this one. Wakeham and brooks will have a competition to see who can completely neuter the attack inside the attacking 20m the most

 

[SDM]

.

 

[Someone2]

Tigers to remain the only winless team in the comp

 

[lockscombi]

No way the Storm let in easy trys off silly errors this week @ home. With Munster back in they should decimate the poor tigers by at least 18 points. I said "Should", not "Will"