Here's a novel idea - why don't England travel once every while? Always up to the southern nations to go up your way, but never the return leg.
Boo hoo. England should be committed to helping grow the international game in Europe. France being the first option, then you could see how Wales, Lebanon, Malta etc are going along. Every nation starts somewhere.
It's not up to the Pacific nations to prop up an English team that is all hot air hype. It's not a real ashes if it's not the GB Lions team
Two good points. The first, I don’t believe tours to the southern hemisphere are profitable for England, whereas they are for the SH nations to come to England. From a sporting perspective, seeing England having to go to Port Moresby and Auckland, amongst other places, would be an interesting watch. I suppose it goes back to how you make it profitable and that’s England competing on the pitch, beating the likes of New Zealand and Australia regularly home and away and that will generate interest and ticket sales.
England absolutely should be doing more to build up France and collaborating to create a second strong (relatively speaking) NH nation. The issue again goes back to money, the need for promotion and relegation at club level by ageing self-interested chairmen and just generally a resistance to anything with a funny accent that doesn’t play in a former mining village. Again, England need to play more, get better onfield and even back to a point 20 years ago where they were winning games against Australia and New Zealand, create interest in their games, create profitable series’ and then reinvest into areas of interest like France, for example.
It all goes back to my post after the first test where we need a root and branch review into every aspect of the game in England from pathways to the very top and to work out what we actually want to achieve as a sport.