bad boy bubby
Coach
- Messages
- 15,804
Yep. This one was obvious.That was so much worse than To'o's
Yep. This one was obvious.That was so much worse than To'o's
Yep. This one was obvious.
The rule should have been changed the Thursday morning after OriginWhat can they do about it though?
He scored and I don't think you can award an 8 point try for it (I could be wrong)
Scoring with a penalty attached is the definition of an 8 point tryWhat can they do about it though?
He scored and I don't think you can award an 8 point try for it (I could be wrong)
must be a stop start life. never in a finals game?Love watching the dolphins when they are playing like this
Scoring with a penalty attached is the definition of an 8 point try
Well I'm going off SOO where the discussion was if it was a "penalty try or a sin bin", they went sin bin because they weren't sure 100% sure if Coates would have scored.I think the technical wording of the rule is actually an act of foul play though?
I don't disagree, I just don't know that the NRL sees the wording as including that sort of mid air tackle as "foul play". It's more like being offside. I'd have no problems if they did though.
Well I'm going off SOO where the discussion was if it was a "penalty try or a sin bin", they went sin bin because they weren't sure 100% sure if Coates would have scored.
In that act, this one was a penalty try.
That was smoother than a Storm fans brain
Reap what you sew taking the cowards two at the beginning of the gamelucky the dragons scored 2, only 26 more needed in 40 min
But Tashkent is lovely.Send the Dragons to Tashkent