What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2026 Match Review Charges & Judiciary

BuffaloRules

Coach
Messages
18,204
I’ve been reading in the Terrorgraph that Mary has been doing it a bit tough in Manchester since she cameback from the injury ….

I hope Nathan goes over there to visit her whilst he is out
 

blaza88z

Coach
Messages
15,352
Penrith fans thinking the lack of a HIA is an indication that the tackle wasn't reckless

The kid got one up over the Pennies when he ran over Dylan Edwards like he was nothing, so big bad Nath stepped up and he probably gets suspended for it
 

Chins

First Grade
Messages
5,069
Penrith fans thinking the lack of a HIA is an indication that the tackle wasn't reckless

The kid got one up over the Pennies when he ran over Dylan Edwards like he was nothing, so big bad Nath stepped up and he probably gets suspended for it
The video ref binned him, the same video ref told said no need for a HIA
 

blaza88z

Coach
Messages
15,352
The video ref binned him, the same video ref told said no need for a HIA

Pretty sure the guy who makes decisions on the game isn't the same guy responsible for determining if someone is showing signs of a concussion

You're suggesting the independant match doctor is also advising Klein to send them to the bin
 

Nealo 12

First Grade
Messages
6,109
Penrith fans thinking the lack of a HIA is an indication that the tackle wasn't reckless

The kid got one up over the Pennies when he ran over Dylan Edwards like he was nothing, so big bad Nath stepped up and he probably gets suspended for it
I get it you will need a leg up for a bad WCC performance
 

Stinkfinger

Juniors
Messages
1,141
Penrith fans thinking the lack of a HIA is an indication that the tackle wasn't reckless

The kid got one up over the Pennies when he ran over Dylan Edwards like he was nothing, so big bad Nath stepped up and he probably gets suspended for it
The charge is careless high tackle grade 2 isn't it? The argument appears to be it didn't contact the head. Lack of HIA supports this.
 

Chins

First Grade
Messages
5,069
Pretty sure the guy who makes decisions on the game isn't the same guy responsible for determining if someone is showing signs of a concussion

You're suggesting the independant match doctor is also advising Klein to send them to the bin
Your boy Walsh's in the GF was far worse and got nothing. Unclutch those pearls honey
 

blaza88z

Coach
Messages
15,352
Your boy Walsh's in the GF was far worse and got nothing. Unclutch those pearls honey

You do realise Xavier Coates was literally on his knees right?

This Tigers player, was still standing upright at least, his feet were more planted than Nathan's
 
Messages
2,987
Imagine it was a no name Tigers merkin putting that hit on Cleary.

They'd have been sent off and publicly executed at dawn. But watch the chin get off with the full star player/big club discount.
You have seen Penrith's recent history fighting charges at the judiciary right? Maybe you should check before another stupid comment.
 
Messages
2,987
You do realise Xavier Coates was literally on his knees right?

This Tigers player, was still standing upright at least, his feet were more planted than Nathan's
Walsh made direct forceful contact to a players head and got 0 week’s suspension. Cleary was shoulder on shoulder and the Tigers player got whiplash more than anything.
 
Messages
2,987
Oh, not playing the falling card anymore? Why's that mate?
You seem full of shit mate. The Reece Walsh tackle was far worse and got nothing. The Tigers player was juggling to catch the ball and was indeed falling down a bit, as you can see with the height difference between him and Cleary when standing normally.

What angle are you going with here? Like it was mentioned before, if contact was made to his head why no HIA? Seems a little bit odd don’t you think.
 

blaza88z

Coach
Messages
15,352
You seem full of shit mate. The Reece Walsh tackle was far worse and got nothing. The Tigers player was juggling to catch the ball and was indeed falling down a bit, as you can see with the height difference between him and Cleary when standing normally.

What angle are you going with here? Like it was mentioned before, if contact was made to his head why no HIA? Seems a little bit odd don’t you think.

No.

You idiots think HIA is a direct correlation to contact with the head, I have seen multiple times where a guy is hit in the head and there's no HIA. It's not as clear cut as "hit in the head, HIA", or there'd be one on every other tackle.

Far worse? There was a significant mitigating circumstance, Coates was on his knees after being buckled over by another defender. He also wasn't leading with his shoulder, his arm was very obviously wrapped around. Ready for the kicker, make sure you are seated for this one. Coates didn't go for a HIA, guess he wasn't hit in the head, right? No? you said he was? Then why wasn't there a HIA?

Cleary, races up, feet may have been coincidentally on the ground when he made contact but his momentum and the frames after contact clearly indicate there was nothing controlled about how he was trying to hit him. Who gives a shit what the Tigers player was trying to do? What the f**k was Nathan Cleary doing? What a dumb play.
 
Top