What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

26 June expansion meeting (Predictions?)

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,455
If the NRL had their time again, would they have approved the Wests Tigers, St.George Illawarra and Northern Eagles?

At the time, the NRL was only interested in reducing Sydney teams, instead of how those mergers were going to operate/ function.
Illawarra would have got no team at all lol
 

Bukowski

Bench
Messages
2,692
If the NRL had their time again, would they have approved the Wests Tigers, St.George Illawarra and Northern Eagles?

At the time, the NRL was only interested in reducing Sydney teams, instead of how those mergers were going to operate/ function.
Probably saints, but that was really a takeover. The 50/50 mergers havnt worked out.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,294
If the NRL had their time again, would they have approved the Wests Tigers, St.George Illawarra and Northern Eagles?

At the time, the NRL was only interested in reducing Sydney teams, instead of how those mergers were going to operate/ function.

Well two still together & now bears look to be based in Perth so all good..
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,455
Great take..
..Adelaide Rams?!
Always were only padding because Newcastle and then the dragons didn’t go to super league and they were short one

Perth back then had genuine rugby league roots (Perth grand final would get over 10k)

news ltd should never have killed them off for Cronulla
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,294
Always were only padding because Newcastle and then the dragons didn’t go to super league and they were short one

Perth back then had genuine rugby league roots (Perth grand final would get over 10k)

news ltd should never have killed them off for Cronulla

Adelaide performed better than reds. This is what ribot said:
The one which was closest to making a dollar was Adelaide. We had a very parochial one-team city. It was sad to see them folded
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,294
Steelers board member and then speaker of the House of Reps, Steve Martin, resigned from the club. He wanted the Steelers to join Super League so the club could survive. Instead the Steelers stayed loyal to the ARL. Meanwhile Sydney clubs like Cronulla and Penrith went to SL.

Fine margins...

Would Steelers fans have accepted superleague?! Certainly, Newcastle for example had no choice. Fans were anti superleague.
 

Steel Saints

Juniors
Messages
1,052
Would Steelers fans have accepted superleague?! Certainly, Newcastle for example had no choice. Fans were anti superleague.

Oh yeah there was anti Murdoch sentiment. However the Steelers were still a relatively young club. They were only in the comp for 17 seasons. The last four years of their existence was impacted by SL. Sure, other clubs do establish quicker than others, eg, Newcastle Knights.

But anyway, it is what is. I've accepted the Dragons. But more importantly, the younger generation accepts them.

Getting back to the Bears, they are more or less, relocating to Perth. And I can't wait to see them. Exciting times ahead for the game.

Onwards and upwards.
 
Messages
14,822
It's the very reason the AFL plonked clubs on the Gold Coast and Western Sydney, while ignoring Tasmania as long as they could, and then making the latter jump through hoops no bid has ever had to before.
The Gold Coast Suns draw fewer TV viewers in Brisbane than an AwFuL game that doesn't feature a Queensland team.

In Brisbane, the Lions averaged 48,000 in 2023 – +17% YoY – (including a season high of 80,000), while the Suns managed 22,000 per game (no movement). Games involving neither side rated 26,000, (To be fair the Suns are Gold Coast based, but did struggle at the lower end of the ratings).

 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,455
Steelers board member and then speaker of the House of Reps, Steve Martin, resigned from the club. He wanted the Steelers to join Super League so the club could survive. Instead the Steelers stayed loyal to the ARL. Meanwhile Sydney clubs like Cronulla and Penrith went to SL.

Fine margins...
lol dragons roosters manly Balmain wests crushers Gold Coast could’ve gong to super league too that and probably be stand alone now

you made a comment about how bad the jv are which I’m saying sure they are but if they did look at them closely no Steelers lol
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,455
Would Steelers fans have accepted superleague?! Certainly, Newcastle for example had no choice. Fans were anti superleague.
Newcastle would’ve supported wherever their club went as would’ve Illawarra

pretty much any fans would’ve followed where their club went

Knights were all but agreed to go to super league until Phil Gould convinced the Johns boys to stay loyal and the club was forced to follow

St George were all set to go till Johnny raper stepped onstage and ripped up a saints jerseys ?

I hated super league with a passion of Balmain had gone over and emerged stand alone I would’ve have cared who else got kicked out of the comp
 

Pj,Rj,Hj

Juniors
Messages
196
The Gold Coast Suns draw fewer TV viewers in Brisbane than an AwFuL game that doesn't feature a Queensland team.

In Brisbane, the Lions averaged 48,000 in 2023 – +17% YoY – (including a season high of 80,000), while the Suns managed 22,000 per game (no movement). Games involving neither side rated 26,000, (To be fair the Suns are Gold Coast based, but did struggle at the lower end of the ratings).​
Still more commercially valuable to the AFL than the new Tasmania Devils
 

Pj,Rj,Hj

Juniors
Messages
196
Adelaide performed better than reds. This is what ribot said:
The one which was closest to making a dollar was Adelaide. We had a very parochial one-team city. It was sad to see them folded
The Reds had a winning percentage of 41.4%
The Rams had a winning percentage of 35.4%
If they were closest to "making a dollar" it was likely that they had a better flight and accommodation arrangement than The Reds.
I have no idea how manageable The Rams rent agreement was, but weren't they evicted from the Adelaide Oval
 
Messages
14,822
Still more commercially valuable to the AFL than the new Tasmania Devils
Is it?

A Carlton vs Port Adelaide game draws more viewers in Brisbane than one involving the Gold Coast Suns. Carlton and Port Adelaide draw strong ratings in Melbourne and Adelaide. Suns draw shit ratings eveywhere.

Ch7 are stuck with airing 22 Suns games into Brisbane each year. They would recoup more money by airing any other team.
 
Messages
14,822
The Reds had a winning percentage of 41.4%
The Rams had a winning percentage of 35.4%
If they were closest to "making a dollar" it was likely that they had a better flight and accommodation arrangement than The Reds.
I have no idea how manageable The Rams rent agreement was, but weren't they evicted from the Adelaide Oval
The Rams drew far bigger crowds than the Reds in 1997. Travel expenses would have hurt the Reds.
 
Top