3rd T20I: Australia v India at Sydney on Jan 31, 2016

[Hutty1986]

We are an absolute rabble in this format. That poor derp kid is out of his depth

 

[hineyrulz]

Just too good. Our bowling and fielding was dreadful again.

 

[jargan83]

Mitchell Starc in a moon boot would have done better.

 

[Tommy Smith]

Boland
Tait
Tye

Right up there with McGrath, Gillespie, Lee.

 

[WaznTheGreat]

We all thought modern batsmen had it easy cos of the pitches,they actually have it easy cos bowlers are a bunch of shitheads who don't know what a yorker is

 

[Twatface Magee]

Watto looked like he was about to knock Slater out right then.
"Well, we can tell you the good news is you're man of the match."

 

[Spot On]

Well the Aussie bowlers have shit for brains. They really have no idea how to bowl in this format of the game. Some just shouldn't be there.

 

[RoosTah]

Who the f**k is Andrew Tye? Shocking bowling from us today... every second ball was a wide FFS.

 

[Pete Cash]

Boland
Tait
Tye

Right up there with McGrath, Gillespie, Lee.

Don't even need to go that far back. We won a world cup with Starc, Johnson and Hazlewood only a year ago.

 

[Twatface Magee]

Kohli looking at getting a house in Sydney.
Tell him to get f**ked.

 

[Twatface Magee]

Imagine it had gone to a super over.
Wonder if 'The Mentalist' would have predicted that given he doesn't know what the rules are or what T20 is.

 

[RoosTah]

One thing that always seem stupid to me in the shorter form of the game is how they describe wins from chases. Surely in T20, where teams often still have a lot of batsman left at the end of their innings it's more accurate to say how many balls they won by rather than wickets.

Of course, in a game like this, where the each faced exactly 20 overs, you might as well just say how many runs they won by. Either way, wickets makes no sense.

 

[ANTiLAG]

One thing that always seem stupid to me in the shorter form of the game is how they describe wins from chases. Surely in T20, where teams often still have a lot of batsman left at the end of their innings it's more accurate to say how many balls they won by rather than wickets.

Of course, in a game like this, where the each faced exactly 20 overs, you might as well just say how many runs they won by. Either way, wickets makes no sense.

Agreed.

It is a hangover of test cricket that ignores the "limited" in limited overs cricket.

 

[Bazal]

On the plus side Boyce bowled really well

 

[cleary89]

Mentalist sucks. He said 197/5 to 200/5. It was 200/3. What a genius!

 

[Twatface Magee]

Either it's fake or he asked the BCCI for the score yesterday.

 

[Fufu Andronez]

Hope he does buy in Sydney, would give him a reason to play in the Big Bash. Would light it up

 

[ANTiLAG]

Hope he does buy in Sydney, would give him a reason to play in the Big Bash. Would light it up

Reckon the Strikers might get him at a discount, despite him staying in Sydney.

 

[Pete Cash]

Why wouldnt a person want to live in Sydney. Its a pretty nice city.

 

[blaza88z]

Why wouldnt a person want to live in Sydney. Its a pretty nice city.

:lol: