What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

3rd test match thoughts

AuckMel

Bench
Messages
2,959
aqua_duck said:
Kiwis caught up? The performace against Aust mid season suggest otherwise.

Please. The cowardly one-off tests matches that Australia insists on only playing against New Zealand are a joke, and should be treated as such.

Front up for a full 3 test series for a change, make sure both teams get the right preperation with all players available, and then we'll see who's really the best.
 

Edwahu

Bench
Messages
3,697
The Brits have got some really good footballers coming through. The bulk of their pack and threequarter line are as good as what we can put up at fullstrength. The same is true of the Kiwis. The British jsut need to get over their mental "issues".
 

kier

Juniors
Messages
130
Three games, GB in the lead in the final 5 minutes in each game and ending up the losers each time show that we are behind in experiencing/playing "pressure football". In all other aspects it was difficult to place a piece of paper between the two sides.

I've always held the belief that GBRL has only been truely professional for about 5 years and that the GB players who came onto the scene before that time (Farrell, McDermott, Connelly....etc) are really just part-timers who happen to earn a lot of cash.

It's in the mental approach that we are lacking atm BUT - the crop of young players we are developing in the UK will (for the first time ever) be the complete package. The standards of fitness and skill in the SL have risen dramatically - it is the development between the ears that takes time.

The results from the Academy v Aus Schoolboys and the England'A' team show the structure of academy football is finally producing players that are the complete package.
 
Messages
3,296
Russell Smith spoiled all bar 75 minutes of the Test yesterday with some utterly atrocious refereeing. Some woeful calls and he barely kept the sides 5m apart the entire game. Both sides took advantage of this to be continually offside throughout the game, lie all over the tackled player and holding onto the ball to slow down the play the ball.

If the RLIF are going to be fair dinkum about international football, it needs to develop a uniform set of rules and an international panel of professional referees, preferably neutral ones at that.

As for Great Britain, not enough imagination and the Test was again there for the taking. Leading 12-6 late in the game, they seemed content to simply look for the touch finder and to try and force an error from Australia in their own half to then set up for the field goal, instead of going for the jugular. Too much lateral movement, instead of hitting the advantage line and looking to offload, and poor ball handling. Having said that, the conditions were not conducive to attacking football.

For the Aussies, congratulations on a 3-0 clean sweep and congratulations to Chris Anderson for a magnificent coaching job to achieve this. It may not have been pretty to watch for large periods, but it was effective and did the job. Ricketson's try at the death was one of the best tries you'll ever see and that bit of brilliance was, in itself, worth getting up early to see (and eclipsed anything that the Toffball Cup Final could deliver).
 

terracesider

Juniors
Messages
883
AuckMel said:
terracesider said:
You kidding?

Not at all.

With an ounce of luck, GB could easily have won this series 3-0.

I've partly calmed down now, to the extent I only want to sack Waite, not mangle him in a cement mixer, but I can't agree luck had anything to do with it. It wasn't luck that we had an ageing side whilst all the younger players were not selected. It wasn't luck that we had a side full of known bottlers and chokers whilst the confidence of youth was not selected. We did'nt deserve to win.


Eskimo Sharkie said:
Russell Smith spoiled all bar 75 minutes of the Test yesterday with some utterly atrocious refereeing. Some woeful calls and he barely kept the sides 5m apart the entire game. Both sides took advantage of this to be continually offside throughout the game, lie all over the tackled player and holding onto the ball to slow down the play the ball.

Even a year ago Smith was a top class referee, but this year he's completely lost it, for some unkown reason. Saturday wasn't Smith's worst, or even second worst, game this season. We've suffered him twice at Huddersfield. Against Leeds he gave us two points, and against
Warrington, when he completely lost control of the players, he cost us two.
He was a bit ropey in the Challenge Cup final as well.

The Kangaroos play up if they don't get a referee they know, so everybody was lumbered with him.
 

In-goal

Bench
Messages
3,523
With an ounce of luck, GB could easily have won this series 3-0.

Very true comment one in which many couldn't or shouldn't argue.

Also i thought the GB on line defence was as good if not the best i have seen from any side ever, they held Australia out on the line for around 20 minutes in each test quite phinominale.

In the end it's these efforts that kill you in the dying minutes.
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
33,329
In-goal said:
With an ounce of luck, GB could easily have won this series 3-0.

Very true comment one in which many couldn't or shouldn't argue.

Also i thought the GB on line defence was as good if not the best i have seen from any side ever, they held Australia out on the line for around 20 minutes in each test quite phinominale.

In the end it's these efforts that kill you in the dying minutes.

You saying the video ref decisions weren't luck? Actually, I agree, they weren't luck they were blatant bias!
 

Latest posts

Top