9 to show Storm live into Melbourne

[elbusto]

is the game still live tonight in melbourne

It is in Tassie!

 

[flamin]

Yes it is!

And its up against AFL for the last hour.

http://www.yourtv.com.au/guide/index.cfm

And Melbourne's game is still down to be live as well.

http://www.yourtv.com.au/guide/index.cfm

 

[babyg]

Awsome if both games are being shown live. I'm predicting good ratings for both if they don't get hooked.

180k for Storm
230k for Test

 

[Neatoboy]

I'd say it's only because there is no FTA AFL on in VIC on that Sunday.

Did this game end up being live into Victoria and if so, does anybody know what ratings it received?

 

[user_nat]

90k

Overall it outrated the previous Sunday game.

 

[Western_Eel]

The storm game got 90k, and the test got 257k
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2010/05/week-20-2.html
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2010/05/week-20-2.html

 

[Generalzod]

Who cares if 9 are showing live storm games...

 

[Paullyboy]

Those figures for the Storm game are pretty average. Or is that sorta standard for a Sunday arvo?

The test figures look brilliant though - which is a shame as it was a poor advertisement for rugby league.

 

[Neatoboy]

The storm game got 90k, and the test got 257k
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2010/05/week-20-2.html
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2010/05/week-20-2.html

Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Perth

Nine’s Sunday Football Nine 605,000 250,000 90,000 265,000 *** ***

The above ratings don't make sense. I think they have them in the wrong order. I think it should be Sydney 605k, Brisbane 265k, Melbourne 250k and Adelaide or Perth 90k.

The way I read these ratings is that Syndey got 605k, Melbourne got 250k, Brisbane got 90k and Adelaide or Perth got 265k. Am I reading this wrong or have they messed up the order???

 

[Butters]

The above ratings don't make sense. I think they have them in the wrong order. I think it should be Sydney 605k, Brisbane 265k, Melbourne 250k and Adelaide or Perth 90k.

The way I read these ratings is that Syndey got 605k, Melbourne got 250k, Brisbane got 90k and Adelaide or Perth go 265k. Am I reading this wrong or have they messed up the order???

It goes: Total, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide/Perth, Adelaide/Perth

I can't remember the order Adelaide and Perth are in.

 

[Neatoboy]

It goes: Total, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide/Perth, Adelaide/Perth

I can't remember the order Adelaide and Perth are in.

Yes, that is how I understand it to which means:

Syndey got 605k, Melbourne got 250k, Brisbane got 90k and Adelaide or Perth got 265k which to me is obviously wrong! Why would Brisbane only get 90k and Adelaide get 265k!

 

[Butters]

Yes, that is how I understand it to which means:

Syndey got 605k, Melbourne got 250k, Brisbane got 90k and Adelaide or Perth got 265k which to me is obviously wrong! Why would Brisbane only get 90k and Adelaide get 265k!

The total is 605, Sydney 250, Melbourne 90, Brisbane 265 and Perth and Adelaide 0 as the game wasn't shown there.

 

[Neatoboy]

The total is 605, Sydney 250, Melbourne 90, Brisbane 265 and Perth and Adelaide 0 as the game wasn't shown there.

Thanks for the clarifcation... I didn't relaise the first figure was the total.