Sorry to break rules of the game, but this I disagree with this idea. Countries with massive birth rates and population growth are places where disease rates are far higher, with people feeling they need to have so many kids to ensure their family has another generation make it to adulthood. Developed countries birthdates are actually below the Rate needed to sustain a population, they're population will decline without immigration.
It's not just about controlling disease, it's about improving education.
So... Rhino NQ might be right about population control via poopchute
Crikey! Could be a good post for 4 corners!
I’ll break rules too...
Reason I posed it was an interview I heard years ago with David Attenborough who was asked what the biggest change he’s seen in the world during his life...
the reply was akin to - the earth has stayed the same size but the human population has increased immensely. We are in each other’s faces more and nature has suffered.
With no disease, that effectively “culls” humans, what would be the effects in other aspects.... would it be worse or better... ?
Anyway philosophical hat is off and back to the spirit of the thread, noting there’s no “open” question...
So I’ll go...
Koala meat would be tasty