Generalzod
Immortal
- Messages
- 33,901
Protein...lolhttps://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ra...egedly-assaulting-police-20201206-p56kzg.html
What's in the milk down there?
Protein...lolhttps://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ra...egedly-assaulting-police-20201206-p56kzg.html
What's in the milk down there?
calciumProtein...lol
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...p/news-story/ce2bb34f9a979c1dd07661f095f7ebdc
So police are claiming he tried to grab an officers gun so they punched him repeatedly in the face.
I smell another big compo payout coming.
The post got deleted last night (and fair enough since i didnt source the report) but i said last night that something about that doesnt smell right to me
I mean if he did reach for the gun, wooof.... but why would he? There is no logical reason for him to reach for the cops gun even if he's in an all in brawl, and less so if his story is true and he was there just to try to break up a fight involving his brother.
This is not passing the sniff test at all imo
Was he under the influence of alcohol?, makes you do stupid things...
You know nick being young and peer pressure plays in these kinds of circumstances.I've seen many, many drunk people involved in many many fights where cops are involved...
Never once have i seen someone reach for the cops gun, its just not really something i think people think about even doing, drunk or not... it is something that a cop could say happened if he jacked up someone without any real reason...
If Starling was drunk, got involved in a violent brawl and then attempted to get a police officers gun, then he'll get exactly what he deserves. But as said, that is hard to me to make sense of
Maybe to show police brutality...Why would he post a photo of himself if he was guilty as well?
They should build a wall in Sutton and never let any Raiders through
Finally!!! Something we can agree on!!The NRL should legalise weed and ban booze for these players.
The cynic in me sees a similar pattern to the Scott case when the police stuffed up big time, acted like thugs & then invented a bunch of bulldust charges and claims to try and cover their asses. In that case a "a police source" also leaked a bunch of really bad sounding lies early on to win PR support & build pressure on the victim- remember when that terrible NRL player had assaulted a lady policeman in the Scott case... same pattern.
I just don't buy that Starling grabbed a cops gun while out for Sunday lunch with his mum.
Maybe a cop remembers Starling's arm grabbing around their waist for balance while they tried to throw him to the ground or something & they think that'll hold up on camera.
I'm skeptical.
Josh would draw his own name from the hat and call the police to dob himself in again.First they came for Curtis, now Tom
Lord help the poor souls sent to do the job when Josh Papalii’s name is drawn from the hat