tiger john
Juniors
- Messages
- 30
tigers / storm
hindmarsh4pm said:if parra have no injuries than they will be there. parra v storm, they have the class and forward packs to beat anyone
melbournes back line is awesome, their halves are good, i just feel maybe melbournes forward oack, while they are strong and effective can be domminated if they are really pushed to the limit.
parramatta, not being biased here, but probably have the most gifted talented players going around in hayne and inu, these 2 kids are freaks, of course we dont know how they will go in the big games when semis come around. also we have grothe and tahu who are 2 of the most devastating attackers, ben smith who is as strong as they come. and luke burt to come back who was in outstanding form.
Parras forward pack is awesome, hindmarsh and cayless lead the way with fuifui and cannings coming on to finish off the job, with robinson the tackling machine never letting the team down. cordoba who is coming along nicley to.
then our hooker rotation in riddell and pj, these 2 guys can change a game with just one run of the footy or one big hit.
then come the halves, what parra have lacked in recent years. but with finch doing the little work and taking pressure of tim, it has helped him. tim is now just a halfback doing his job, not throwing those dumb balls and not tryign to score off every play.
parra v melbourne imo
manly i think lack that killer instince, and if parra were on their game for 80min when they versed eachother parra would have out 50 on them
i know it sounded biased because ionly focused on parra lolGarts said:No you are not biased at all!!!!
Parra are a good team on their day but that last comment makes you look stupid!!!!
Garts said:Same can be said by us, we had a lull in the last 20 of the first half and let in some soft tries. For Parra to touch us up Manly would need to be way off their game and Parra on theirs. If both are on their game it will go down to the wire but Parra need to learn to play for 80 mins, no good being great for 40 or 50 mins only!!!!
relax and take a chill pill, its a forum where everyone can have their sayeels_fan_01 said:F*ck this sh*t on this forum right now off "oh if we played like this for 20 mins" "if you played like that for 60 mins". Manly are infront of us and have beaten us twice, they deserve the bragging rights for now, same as Eels have the bragging rights over the team that has lost twice to the wooden spooners, the Bulldogs.
CharlieF said:Manly has more structure in their play and I would consider them more consistent than Parra. Their ability to vary their attack to suit the conditions during a game has been the reason for them winning so many games this year. Their defence has few weaknesses and their physical condition today is as good as any team in the NRL. They have won games this year at grounds that they have not won at since Parra last won a GF. I would have agreed with people that Manly will crack in big games, but not after seeing the Manly side of 2007. As a long time follower, this team plays completely different than even the team of last year. There are some extremely hungry players in the side who will be giving that over-rated tag a real shake.
Its not so clear cut as you think.
hindmarsh4pm said:if parra have no injuries than they will be there. parra v storm, they have the class and forward packs to beat anyone
melbournes back line is awesome, their halves are good, i just feel maybe melbournes forward oack, while they are strong and effective can be domminated if they are really pushed to the limit.
hindmarsh4pm said:relax and take a chill pill, its a forum where everyone can have their say
melbourne do have a good forward pack, with the likes oh johnson and hoffman, but the roosters dominated them and at parts of the sharks game they were getting domminated and then had no where to go. The storm's success relies on cameron smith, boy does he make a difference to that sideIce777 said:While i think everything else you said was fair enough, people have been knocking our forward pack for a couple of years now saying we can be dominated by bigger packs etc But the Storm have won 31 of the past 37 games and as i've read many many people saying games are won and lost in the forwards then i think that shows we don't often get dominated and hold our own pretty well. Maybe we don't dominate other packs but we rarely get dominated either.