I've barely posted in here the past couple of weeks as there's really nothing left to say that hasn't been said a thousand times before.
But I wanted to pop in on this one once more.
There's been plenty of argument that Atkinson is there as "injury cover"
Well, we had an injury yesterday after 24 minutes.
Did Atkinson cover it?
Nope.
There goes that argument.
Unf**king-believable he would be kept on the bench yesterday after Puru was included, while Burns is there for moral support.
Really, I'm at the point now where, as long as Fitzy is in charge, I'm not interested.
He has the squad he wants.
He built it.
He's spent 3 1/2 years training them on how he wants them to play.
And it's gotten us to where we are: miles off the pace.
He has shown an inability to develop players, or identify areas of the squad which need strengthening.
As far as options coming through, the cupboard looks bare for the foreseeable future.
His steadfast refusal to introduce new blood over the past 3 years has seen the team stagnate and now is teetering on the precipice of oblivion.
On current trajectory we are 18 months away from battling it out for the spoon.
Don't believe me?
Have a look at what happened to the Eels, post-2022.
They're the blueprint, and he's following it to the letter.
So that's about it for me.
I'm checking out.
I'll pop in to read, though not as avidly as before.
And I can't see myself adding anything to the conversation.
I will leave with this though:
@Phillip Rothfield , if that's really you, at what point do you and your ilk start questioning Fitzy's coaching abilities?