Attacking vs grinding myth

[maestro1]

The three errors by Zillman were the catalyst for the Roosters win. Each one of those errors lead to rooster tries. That whole win was due to those three crucial errors. Everytime the titans looked like they were getting back into the game, Zillman (who is a lot better than his effort on friday night) let the roosters off the hook. They lead to 18 points and game over........

 

[TheRev]

2009 – Dragons 29-0 & 34-12
2010 – Dragons 28-6 & 19-12

Dragons 110 - Roosters 30

Should this equal confidence ?

Yeah its a nice edge and it gives me hope.... we have a very good record against the Roosters, although Carney is far more confident/dominant than he was back then, also kicking at what seems to be 100% lately.

But being old... lemme tell you a little story about 1999... We played Melbourne twice and smashed them twice, I even went on the Dragons Bus to Melbourne to watch the 34-10 Qualifying Finals win, a good time was had by all!

Of course we when on to lose against them in the 1999 Grand Final, in tragic circumstances... and we were their bunnies for years.. fate can be cruel! and past form means little....

 

[dragonfan12]

I reckon if we can stop carney, they wont have much to offer.

Read on foxsports that wen he used to play country footy, there was some player that said they used to have a player constantly marking him 10 metres behind the defense line. Then he wont be able to make those phil blake chip kicks

Wonder if we will employ a similar strategy