What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Australian Rugby League Hall of Fame

shaggy

Juniors
Messages
885
Now i would like to see an actual hall of fame, maybe opened for next years 100 year clebrations but i doubt this is going to happen. People are saying Andrew Johns should skip the normal Hall of Fame and skip straight to Immortal status. Now as Paul Kent stated in thr Daily Telegraph Rugby League Week has decided on who the seven immortals have been.

Now what I would like to see is the Australian Rugby League take ownership of the immortal name and award status in the hall of fame after passing a certain criteria and immortal status after a tougher criteria.

What this criteria may be is up for debate but here are what some of the other sporting bodies decide on who is the next inductee in their hall of fame and what further criteria they may have for their own "immortals"

American football:
Enshrinees are selected by a 39-member committee, largely made up of sportswriters, officially known as the Board of Selector
The Board consists of one media representative from each NFL city,
There are also six at-large delegates (usually cities that lose NFL teams keep representation on the board; Los Angeles is the only current city to have lost an NFL team and not been granted an expansion team), and one representative from the Pro Football Writers of America. Except for the PFWA representative, who is appointed to a two-year term, all other appointments are open-ended and terminated only by death, retirement, or resignation.

Voting procedure

To be eligible for the nominating process, a player must have been retired at least five years, and a coach must be retired. Any other contributor such as a team owner or executive can be elected at any time.
Fans may nominate any player, coach or contributor by simply writing to the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The Selection Committee is then polled three times by mail to eventually narrow the list to 25 semifinalists: once in March, one in September, and one in October. In November, the committee then selects 15 finalists by mail balloting.
Nine members of the Selection Committee also serve as a subcommittee known as the Seniors Committee to screen candidates who finished their careers 25 or more years prior. The Seniors Committee then adds two finalists from prior to the modern era, making a final ballot of 17.
The Selection Committee then meets the day before each Super Bowl game to elect a new class. To be elected, a finalist must receive at least 80 percent support from the Board, with at least three, but no more than six, candidates being elected annually.



Baeball:

Players are currently inducted into the Hall of Fame through election by either the Baseball Writers Association of America (or BBWAA), or the Veterans Committee, which is now composed of living Hall of Famers and recipients of the two major awards. Five years after retirement, any player with 10 years of major league experience, who passes a screening committee (which removes from consideration players of clearly lesser qualification) is eligible to be elected by BBWAA members with 10 years' membership or more. From a final ballot typically including 25-40 candidates, each writer may vote for up to 10 players; until the late 1950s, voters were advised to cast votes for the maximum 10 candidates. Any player named on 75% or more of all ballots cast is elected. A player who is named on fewer than 5% of ballots is dropped from future elections. In some instances, the screening committee had restored their names to later ballots, but in the mid-1990s, dropped players were made permanently ineligible for Hall of Fame consideration, even by the Veterans Committee. A 2001 change in the election procedures restored the eligibility of these dropped players; while their names will not appear on future BBWAA ballots, they may be considered by the Veterans Committee.
Under special circumstances, certain players may be deemed eligible for induction even though they have not met all requirements. This has resulted in only two inductions: Lou Gehrig, who was specially elected shortly after the disease ALS ended his career in 1939; and Addie Joss, who was elected in 1978 despite only playing in nine seasons due to his death from meningitis. Additionally, if an otherwise eligible player dies before their fifth year of retirement, then that player may be placed on the ballot at the first election at least six months after their death. Roberto Clemente's induction in 1973 set the precedent, when the writers chose to put him up for consideration after his death on New Year's Eve, 1972, and the shortened waiting period was added thereafter.
If a player fails to be elected by the BBWAA within 20 years of their retirement from active play, he may be selected by the Veterans Committee, which now votes every two years. The Veterans Committee also votes every fourth year on candidates from among managers, umpires, executives or builders.

Aussie Rules

A committee considers candidates on the basis of their ability, integrity, sportsmanship and character. While the number of games played, coached or umpired, or years of service in the case of administrators and media representatives, is a consideration, it alone does not determine eligibility. Players must be retired from the game for at least three years before they become eligible for induction, while coaches, umpires, administrators and media representatives are eligible immediately upon retirement. The committee considers candidates from all the states and territories of Australia and from all Australian Football competitions within Australia.
The following excerpt from the official Hall of Fame website highlights the main criteria used by the committee in selecting inductees to the Hall of Fame
The Committee shall consider a candidate’s outstanding service and overall contribution to the game of Australian Football in determining a candidate’s eligibility for induction into the Hall of Fame. Without limiting clause 5.1, the Committee may consider a candidate’s individual record, ability, integrity, sportsmanship and character. The number of football games played, coached or umpired or the years of service provided shall only be a consideration and shall not be determinative in assessing a candidate’s eligibility. A player, coach, umpire, administrator or media representative involved at any level of Australian Football may be eligible for induction into the Hall of Fame. Candidates shall be adjudged on the basis of their overall contribution to Australian Football, as opposed to one specific aspect. The Legends category is reserved for those who are deemed to have had a positive impact on the game of Australian rules. The title of Legend is intended to be bestowed on no more than 10% of the total inductees of the Hall of Fame (the actual percentage of "Legends" to total inductees is currently 10.23%). All "Legends" enshrined to date represent former players of the VFL/AFL, with the exception of Barrie Robran who played the whole of his career in the SANFL. Being named as a "Legend" of the Australian Football Hall of Fame is the highest honour which can be bestowed onto an Australian footballer.

the following are allready members of the australian rugby league hall of fame:
2002
Clive churchill (immortal), Reg Gasnier (immortal), Johhny Raper, (immortal), Graeme Langlands (immortal), Bob Fulton (immortal), Wally Lewis (immortal)
2003
Dally Messnager, Dave Brown, Wally Prigg, Keith Holman, Arthur Beetson (immortal), Mal Meninga

2004
Hary Bath, Norm Provan, Ken Irvine Harry Holder, Frank Burge, Vic Hey

2005
Jimmy Craig, Chris McKivat, Duncan Thompson, Brian Bevan, Brian Carlson, Ron Coote

2006
Ken Kearney, Sid Pearce, Charles Fraser, George Treweek, Duncan Hall, Peter Sterling
 

ShineDog

Juniors
Messages
934
Sorry but I do not think I can read that much on a Friday night..but I would like to say well done on the effort.....Quickly...IMO Hall of Fame sounds like a great idea though.:)
shaggy said:
Now i would like to see an actual hall of fame, maybe opened for next years 100 year clebrations but i doubt this is going to happen. People are saying Andrew Johns should skip the normal Hall of Fame and skip straight to Immortal status. Now as Paul Kent stated in thr Daily Telegraph Rugby League Week has decided on who the seven immortals have been.

Now what I would like to see is the Australian Rugby League take ownership of the immortal name and award status in the hall of fame after passing a certain criteria and immortal status after a tougher criteria.

What this criteria may be is up for debate but here are what some of the other sporting bodies decide on who is the next inductee in their hall of fame and what further criteria they may have for their own "immortals"

American football:
Enshrinees are selected by a 39-member committee, largely made up of sportswriters, officially known as the Board of Selector
The Board consists of one media representative from each NFL city,
There are also six at-large delegates (usually cities that lose NFL teams keep representation on the board; Los Angeles is the only current city to have lost an NFL team and not been granted an expansion team), and one representative from the Pro Football Writers of America. Except for the PFWA representative, who is appointed to a two-year term, all other appointments are open-ended and terminated only by death, retirement, or resignation.

Voting procedure

To be eligible for the nominating process, a player must have been retired at least five years, and a coach must be retired. Any other contributor such as a team owner or executive can be elected at any time.
Fans may nominate any player, coach or contributor by simply writing to the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The Selection Committee is then polled three times by mail to eventually narrow the list to 25 semifinalists: once in March, one in September, and one in October. In November, the committee then selects 15 finalists by mail balloting.
Nine members of the Selection Committee also serve as a subcommittee known as the Seniors Committee to screen candidates who finished their careers 25 or more years prior. The Seniors Committee then adds two finalists from prior to the modern era, making a final ballot of 17.
The Selection Committee then meets the day before each Super Bowl game to elect a new class. To be elected, a finalist must receive at least 80 percent support from the Board, with at least three, but no more than six, candidates being elected annually.



Baeball:

Players are currently inducted into the Hall of Fame through election by either the Baseball Writers Association of America (or BBWAA), or the Veterans Committee, which is now composed of living Hall of Famers and recipients of the two major awards. Five years after retirement, any player with 10 years of major league experience, who passes a screening committee (which removes from consideration players of clearly lesser qualification) is eligible to be elected by BBWAA members with 10 years' membership or more. From a final ballot typically including 25-40 candidates, each writer may vote for up to 10 players; until the late 1950s, voters were advised to cast votes for the maximum 10 candidates. Any player named on 75% or more of all ballots cast is elected. A player who is named on fewer than 5% of ballots is dropped from future elections. In some instances, the screening committee had restored their names to later ballots, but in the mid-1990s, dropped players were made permanently ineligible for Hall of Fame consideration, even by the Veterans Committee. A 2001 change in the election procedures restored the eligibility of these dropped players; while their names will not appear on future BBWAA ballots, they may be considered by the Veterans Committee.
Under special circumstances, certain players may be deemed eligible for induction even though they have not met all requirements. This has resulted in only two inductions: Lou Gehrig, who was specially elected shortly after the disease ALS ended his career in 1939; and Addie Joss, who was elected in 1978 despite only playing in nine seasons due to his death from meningitis. Additionally, if an otherwise eligible player dies before their fifth year of retirement, then that player may be placed on the ballot at the first election at least six months after their death. Roberto Clemente's induction in 1973 set the precedent, when the writers chose to put him up for consideration after his death on New Year's Eve, 1972, and the shortened waiting period was added thereafter.
If a player fails to be elected by the BBWAA within 20 years of their retirement from active play, he may be selected by the Veterans Committee, which now votes every two years. The Veterans Committee also votes every fourth year on candidates from among managers, umpires, executives or builders.

Aussie Rules

A committee considers candidates on the basis of their ability, integrity, sportsmanship and character. While the number of games played, coached or umpired, or years of service in the case of administrators and media representatives, is a consideration, it alone does not determine eligibility. Players must be retired from the game for at least three years before they become eligible for induction, while coaches, umpires, administrators and media representatives are eligible immediately upon retirement. The committee considers candidates from all the states and territories of Australia and from all Australian Football competitions within Australia.
The following excerpt from the official Hall of Fame website highlights the main criteria used by the committee in selecting inductees to the Hall of Fame
The Committee shall consider a candidate’s outstanding service and overall contribution to the game of Australian Football in determining a candidate’s eligibility for induction into the Hall of Fame. Without limiting clause 5.1, the Committee may consider a candidate’s individual record, ability, integrity, sportsmanship and character. The number of football games played, coached or umpired or the years of service provided shall only be a consideration and shall not be determinative in assessing a candidate’s eligibility. A player, coach, umpire, administrator or media representative involved at any level of Australian Football may be eligible for induction into the Hall of Fame. Candidates shall be adjudged on the basis of their overall contribution to Australian Football, as opposed to one specific aspect. The Legends category is reserved for those who are deemed to have had a positive impact on the game of Australian rules. The title of Legend is intended to be bestowed on no more than 10% of the total inductees of the Hall of Fame (the actual percentage of "Legends" to total inductees is currently 10.23%). All "Legends" enshrined to date represent former players of the VFL/AFL, with the exception of Barrie Robran who played the whole of his career in the SANFL. Being named as a "Legend" of the Australian Football Hall of Fame is the highest honour which can be bestowed onto an Australian footballer.

the following are allready members of the australian rugby league hall of fame:
2002
Clive churchill (immortal), Reg Gasnier (immortal), Johhny Raper, (immortal), Graeme Langlands (immortal), Bob Fulton (immortal), Wally Lewis (immortal)
2003
Dally Messnager, Dave Brown, Wally Prigg, Keith Holman, Arthur Beetson (immortal), Mal Meninga

2004
Hary Bath, Norm Provan, Ken Irvine Harry Holder, Frank Burge, Vic Hey

2005
Jimmy Craig, Chris McKivat, Duncan Thompson, Brian Bevan, Brian Carlson, Ron Coote

2006
Ken Kearney, Sid Pearce, Charles Fraser, George Treweek, Duncan Hall, Peter Sterling
 

Ridders

Coach
Messages
10,831
that paul kent article really stunned. didn't realise that the Rugby League Week Magazine are the ones who controlled who was an immortal or not. they should give the rights to it to the NRL to make sure it is properly maintained and that the wrong people aren't made immortals
 

yosh64

Juniors
Messages
260
Ridders said:
that paul kent article really stunned. didn't realise that the Rugby League Week Magazine are the ones who controlled who was an immortal or not. they should give the rights to it to the NRL to make sure it is properly maintained and that the wrong people aren't made immortals

Absolutely!! This should be controlled by the ARL. Immortals should be choosen by a committee made up of hall of fame inductees and experienced (meaning not someone who's been around for a small amount of time) sports writers and probably a member of the ARL (only one though). These guys should vote with only people with 90% of the vote selected as immortals. Also like the idea of if they only get 5-10% of the vote they are to be never be a candidate for an immortal again.

Also stats need to be used as well as how many games have been played and played for australia but it cannot rely promenently on these. A players character and reputation as well as their off-field work for the game before and after footy retirement should be included in the decision making process.

Just a thought, could Wayne Bennett be the first coach to be inducted into the Hall of Fame? (im presuming no other coach has been as yet and that its possible).
 

hrundi99

First Grade
Messages
8,414
The HOF is being discussed, but the AFL version is leaking money and it remains to be seen as to whether it would be financially viable.

I'd love it, though...
 

Stranger

Coach
Messages
18,682
THB, i like the immortal status, and i like the Hall of fame.

Perhaps both?

For example to be an immortal you must be in the hall of fame. But to be in the hall of fame you must be retired for more than 5 years. The hall of fame rewards those greats like Stuart and Fittler, while those that are a step above them like Lewis, Gasnier and co are eventually immortals. Of course selection is going to be a grey area.

Or perhaps you have the Hall of fame for those like Stuart and Fittler, but the Immortals as a different category?
 

shaggy

Juniors
Messages
885
the system i like the best is a combination of a few of the hall of fames, where players must wait a certain number of years before they reach the stage of being in the hall of fame, and on the immortals only a certain % can be made immortal, and that percentage is % of people in the hall of fame (confused see afl legands)

remember reading the paul kent article, paul kent writes for a news limited paper, big league is published by news limited, rugby leauge week is big league's main rival, keep that in mind

i believe the arl wanted to leave the immortals at four, but then rlw expanded to 6 then 7, and then the arl took control and decided to start the hall of fame, to take some of the power away from rlw

noted that all info from the hall of fames is wikied, i was bored added to the fact i wanted to add my views to the debate about joey being a rugby league immortal

as for the actual hall of fame, wiki the baseball hall of fame, that should be what the arl should be aiming at, as for a site, either one of the sites of the early nswrl meetings
 

leaguerules

Juniors
Messages
352
werent the nrl and telstra looking at putting at Rugby league Museum Hallof Fame sort of thing at telstra stadium
 

The Preacher

First Grade
Messages
7,193
Rugby League Week started "The Immortals" and it's their right to continue to manage it any way they fit. If they want to hand it over to the ARL or NRL so be it, but you can't say they shouldn't have control over it. "The Immortals" is there baby, and they can carry it any way they want.
 

petetheileet

First Grade
Messages
5,605
i dont like the idea of the media running the show....

im sure the rugby league community wouldn't support it so much if they realised the magazine ran the show
 

TheBourbonBeast

Juniors
Messages
801
Let go of all this musshy sentimentality.....Once your gone your gone. We have the Immortal system in place - thats enough.
 

The Preacher

First Grade
Messages
7,193
petetheileet said:
i dont like the idea of the media running the show....

im sure the rugby league community wouldn't support it so much if they realised the magazine ran the show

Pete, it's their "award". RLW started it and have continued to manage it. Just because people have a great interest into who gets inducted doesn't mean that it should be transfered to one of the ruling bodies. They own it.

Now behave yourself or I'll tell your uncle you're being silly.
icon12.gif
 

yosh64

Juniors
Messages
260
The Preacher said:
Pete, it's their "award". RLW started it and have continued to manage it. Just because people have a great interest into who gets inducted doesn't mean that it should be transfered to one of the ruling bodies. They own it.

Now behave yourself or I'll tell your uncle you're being silly.
icon12.gif


This is a stupid idea of yours. C'mon all you have to do is look at Superleague to see what happens when a commercial interest controls the game. I dont deny that im happy with the way things have been handled for the immortals brand so far.

But what happens when we want a hall of fame. ARL/NRL cant build an immortals section without approval from RLW. A smalltime player in the scheme of things. Its not even the official magazine. RLW cant build an immortals hall of fame, they couldnt afford it and PBL wouldnt care unless it can be earnings positive to their bottom line. Why build a hall when you cant even control the quality of players in it. RLW choose someone and the ARL has to put them into the exhibit, they cant disagree with RLW cause they have no rights when it comes to the Immortal brand! Thats piss poor when an association doesnt control the history of its game!

Plus i dont know of many reputable awards that are handed out by a magazine. Not the Oscars, Grammys, Bafta's, Screen Actors Guild Awards, Loreus Awards, Australian of the Year, etc. TV week owns the logies and who really cares about them and really how reputable are they.

By the way who owns the Dally M award?
 

shaggy

Juniors
Messages
885
yosh64 said:
This is a stupid idea of yours. C'mon all you have to do is look at Superleague to see what happens when a commercial interest controls the game. I dont deny that im happy with the way things have been handled for the immortals brand so far.

But what happens when we want a hall of fame. ARL/NRL cant build an immortals section without approval from RLW. A smalltime player in the scheme of things. Its not even the official magazine. RLW cant build an immortals hall of fame, they couldnt afford it and PBL wouldnt care unless it can be earnings positive to their bottom line. Why build a hall when you cant even control the quality of players in it. RLW choose someone and the ARL has to put them into the exhibit, they cant disagree with RLW cause they have no rights when it comes to the Immortal brand! Thats piss poor when an association doesnt control the history of its game!

Plus i dont know of many reputable awards that are handed out by a magazine. Not the Oscars, Grammys, Bafta's, Screen Actors Guild Awards, Loreus Awards, Australian of the Year, etc. TV week owns the logies and who really cares about them and really how reputable are they.

By the way who owns the Dally M award?

the dally m award was when it began a thing for the telegraph up until 1997, from 1998 it has become the offical award of the nrl

the point about the ARl having to accept RLWs choice of Immoral was the main reason they set up the hall of fame

as for the hall of fame at telstra stadium, thats the bulldogs hall of fame/ring of champions nothing to do with the arl

i say the arl add a legends section to the hall of fame, remember the immortals is the greatest players since WWII, it doesnt count for any great player from 1908-1945
 

The Preacher

First Grade
Messages
7,193
yosh64 said:
This is a stupid idea of yours. C'mon all you have to do is look at Superleague to see what happens when a commercial interest controls the game. I dont deny that im happy with the way things have been handled for the immortals brand so far.

But what happens when we want a hall of fame. ARL/NRL cant build an immortals section without approval from RLW. A smalltime player in the scheme of things. Its not even the official magazine. RLW cant build an immortals hall of fame, they couldnt afford it and PBL wouldnt care unless it can be earnings positive to their bottom line. Why build a hall when you cant even control the quality of players in it. RLW choose someone and the ARL has to put them into the exhibit, they cant disagree with RLW cause they have no rights when it comes to the Immortal brand! Thats piss poor when an association doesnt control the history of its game!

Plus i dont know of many reputable awards that are handed out by a magazine. Not the Oscars, Grammys, Bafta's, Screen Actors Guild Awards, Loreus Awards, Australian of the Year, etc. TV week owns the logies and who really cares about them and really how reputable are they.

By the way who owns the Dally M award?

See what happens when a commercial interest owns the game :lol: Who do you think owns the f**king thing now Yosh ??? The board has 50% News Ltd. and the TV stations, especially 9, give it to the league with match scheduling and on field breaks as it is !!!
What are you going to propose, that the NRL marches into their offices and a band of "brownshirts" say's to them "We now own the Immortals brand!"
RLW started the Immortals, they've made it what it is today, and it's their's to keep for as long as they see fit. If they want to give control of it over to a ruling body, all well and good. If they don't, they dont. End of section, no correspondence entered into, judges decision is final. IT'S f**kING THEIR'S !!!
 

yosh64

Juniors
Messages
260
The Preacher said:
See what happens when a commercial interest owns the game :lol: Who do you think owns the f**king thing now Yosh ??? The board has 50% News Ltd. and the TV stations, especially 9, give it to the league with match scheduling and on field breaks as it is !!!
What are you going to propose, that the NRL marches into their offices and a band of "brownshirts" say's to them "We now own the Immortals brand!"
RLW started the Immortals, they've made it what it is today, and it's their's to keep for as long as they see fit. If they want to give control of it over to a ruling body, all well and good. If they don't, they dont. End of section, no correspondence entered into, judges decision is final. IT'S f**kING THEIR'S !!!

Haha, your pretty funny. You go off the rails when someone doesnt agree with you. Some points though;

1) Thank you for proving my point "Who do you think owns the f**king thing now Yosh ??? The board has 50% News Ltd. and the TV stations, especially 9, give it to the league with match scheduling and on field breaks as it is !!!". Clearly your saying that a commercial interest doesnt care about the game as they "give it to the league...". If they give it to league on match scheduling they can do the same with devaluing the hall of fame by choosing whoever they like as an immortal. Where the editor himself can choose an immortal cause he can, his magazine owns the rights, no one can stop him.

2) Never said they should demand control of the immortals. Legally that can never happen. I agree with you that only they can give control to a ruling body. And thats what im suggesting that should do! This way league controls leagues history!

3) This thread is also about discussing the process of choosing an immortal. Suggesting procedures to be followed so that the immortals brand isnt devalued by poor selections.
 

The Preacher

First Grade
Messages
7,193
yosh64 said:
Haha, your pretty funny. You go off the rails when someone doesnt agree with you. Some points though;

1) Thank you for proving my point "Who do you think owns the f**king thing now Yosh ??? The board has 50% News Ltd. and the TV stations, especially 9, give it to the league with match scheduling and on field breaks as it is !!!". Clearly your saying that a commercial interest doesnt care about the game as they "give it to the league...". If they give it to league on match scheduling they can do the same with devaluing the hall of fame by choosing whoever they like as an immortal. Where the editor himself can choose an immortal cause he can, his magazine owns the rights, no one can stop him.

2) Never said they should demand control of the immortals. Legally that can never happen. I agree with you that only they can give control to a ruling body. And thats what im suggesting that should do! This way league controls leagues history!

3) This thread is also about discussing the process of choosing an immortal. Suggesting procedures to be followed so that the immortals brand isnt devalued by poor selections.

As for point 1. What hall of fame are you talking about Yosh??? They can't devalue anything with their selections of Immortals, because if they induct people into it that aren't worthy of that status, the public will only put off a product that RLW own.
As a magazine, there place in league history is in publishing only, and the ruling bodies can have something of there own that will BE officially part of footy history.
As for point 2. See point one.
As for point 3. To dispell any fears you may have about devaluation, if the league starts their own, calling it whatever they want, opens with those already inducted as RLW Immortals, and then made their own selections after that, that would fix your problem.

In finishing, if the Immortals mean so much to so many people, RLW should be congratulated on their efforts, not told to hand it over because it's too popular for them to keep !!!
 

yosh64

Juniors
Messages
260
The Preacher said:
As for point 1. What hall of fame are you talking about Yosh??? They can't devalue anything with their selections of Immortals, because if they induct people into it that aren't worthy of that status, the public will only put off a product that RLW own.
As a magazine, there place in league history is in publishing only, and the ruling bodies can have something of there own that will BE officially part of footy history.
As for point 2. See point one.
As for point 3. To dispell any fears you may have about devaluation, if the league starts their own, calling it whatever they want, opens with those already inducted as RLW Immortals, and then made their own selections after that, that would fix your problem.

In finishing, if the Immortals mean so much to so many people, RLW should be congratulated on their efforts, not told to hand it over because it's too popular for them to keep !!!

1. The hall of fame is the official hall of fame run by the ARL. And its the fact that you dont know about it that concerns me. Its the official one but everyone only knows about the immortals. People dont know about it, they know about a magazines one only and they dont even know that its owned by a magazine and not the game itself.
You say it will only devalue the immortal name if they choose badly, that it will affect only the magazine. My point is that the general public dont see this, they see it as being a part of the game and they dont know that its owned by the magazine. They think the magazine publishes the inductees that are chosen by the ruling body. So therefore it can affect the game.

3. Same as 1 really. U dont know about the hall of fame thats been around, neither do the public. So the problem isnt really fixed as you suggest by creating an official one.

Mate, agree with your finishing statement. Also im glad your giving me your point of view, even if i dont agree totally with it. I do reckon that its RLW choice to give up control, nobody can take it, nobody should tell them, they are doing a good job so far. All im suggesting is that it would be better for the game if the game at least controlled it.
 

Latest posts

Top