StormChaser
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,780
He's too fat and lazy to be a fullback.
Inglis is slow? Not mobile? Where are you people coming up with this garbage?:lol:Every position is determined by weight...
You don't see any 90kg props running around. Or any 105 kg halfbacks. They have to the correct size to succeed in those positions. And Inglis at this current stage is far too big, and thus less mobile and slow off the mark, to be a fullback.
Every position is determined by weight...
You don't see any 90kg props running around. Or any 105 kg halfbacks. They have to the correct size to succeed in those positions. And Inglis at this current stage is far too big, and thus less mobile and slow off the mark, to be a fullback.
Inglis is slow? Not mobile? Where are you people coming up with this garbage?:lol:
Its not defined by weight as such. If your good enough your good enough, weight be damned.
If Inglis was 150kg and mobile he could play fullback.
I reckon a fit Inglis (95kg or so) is one of the most mobile powerful players Ive seen.
At the moment he could do with losing the equivalent of Bunniesman's IQ in weight.
Its not defined by weight as such. If your good enough your good enough, weight be damned.
If Inglis was 150kg and mobile he could play fullback.
I reckon a fit Inglis (95kg or so) is one of the most mobile powerful players Ive seen.
At the moment he could do with losing the equivalent of Bunniesman's IQ in weight.
At the moment he could do with losing the equivalent of Bunniesman's IQ in weight.
This might sound stupid but I reckon inglis strengthens his defence and gets shifted one day to lock and plays a Steve Menzies style role.
This might sound stupid but I reckon inglis strengthens his defence and gets shifted one day to lock and plays a Steve Menzies style role.