McSharkie said:Rooster Cogburn. said:McSharkie said:Rooster Cogburn. said:McSharkie said:Fittler isn't better than Lewis was. Fittler is third behind Daley. He is third behind Raper and Clyde at lock too.
In your opinion. You probably think Franze is a good player! :lol:
I think Franze has potential. I certainly wouldn't mention him in the same breath as Brad Fittler. Fittler is a deadset champion and I have always enjoyed watching him play. It's a shame he plays for the Roosters. In my opinion he isn't as good as Lewis or Daley. I don't care what your opinion is because as you can see from a different thread, over 90% people believe that what you say on here is wrong. :lol:
I'd be very worried if the people who posted on this site agreed with me. I'd be doing something very wrong!
No. Once again you take the "everyone's wrong but me" stance. You are wrong. You are always wrong. You don't have an objective bone in your body. Nothing you post here can be read with an ounce of respect for it because it is too one eyed. Try taking off your Roosters jumper for a second. Trying looking in from the outside. Try being objective, just once.
sydraider said:I think mogg will rise to greatness, he tore the roosters apart in that last game of the reg season. I see your point though, like i stated i could have made 2 teams with all the champions we have. Mogg is just a personal favourite of mine, i dont expect all to agree, thats cool though
Rooster Cogburn. said:sydraider said:I think mogg will rise to greatness, he tore the roosters apart in that last game of the reg season. I see your point though, like i stated i could have made 2 teams with all the champions we have. Mogg is just a personal favourite of mine, i dont expect all to agree, thats cool though
Tore us apart? He scored a try. Who won again? :lol:
Raider_69 said:greeneyed said:Wing a better hooker than Steve Walters? :roll:
my point exactly
which spud came up with that idiotic idea?!
ball boy said:Rooster Cogburn. said:sydraider said:I think mogg will rise to greatness, he tore the roosters apart in that last game of the reg season. I see your point though, like i stated i could have made 2 teams with all the champions we have. Mogg is just a personal favourite of mine, i dont expect all to agree, thats cool though
Tore us apart? He scored a try. Who won again? :lol:
he made that cat heggerty go off having a sook
ball boy said:Rooster Cogburn. said:sydraider said:I think mogg will rise to greatness, he tore the roosters apart in that last game of the reg season. I see your point though, like i stated i could have made 2 teams with all the champions we have. Mogg is just a personal favourite of mine, i dont expect all to agree, thats cool though
Tore us apart? He scored a try. Who won again? :lol:
he made that cat heggerty go off having a sook
McSharkie said:Fittler isn't better than Lewis was. Fittler is third behind Daley. He is third behind Raper and Clyde at lock too.
Southern Rooster said:McSharkie said:Fittler isn't better than Lewis was. Fittler is third behind Daley. He is third behind Raper and Clyde at lock too.
How do you know. Lewis never came to Sydney to play week in week out against the best there was. Sure at Origin level and playing for Australia he was nothing short of great. I rate Brett Kenny as better than Wally. They played 12 times against each other in Origin and it was 8-4 NSW. Kenny won premierships with Parramatta. I have no doubt Wally was a great in QLD. But the question mark will always remain as to what would have happened had he had to play at that level every week.
My side which is an Australian side only.
Churchill
Grothe
Cronin
Brown
Dimond
Kenny
Johns
Raper
Coote
McCarthy
Lazarus
Krillich
Beetson
Res
Langlands
Messenger
Roach
Burge
drake said:But that was the standard argument at the time, that the queensland based players did not have to contend with the rigours of the sydney based comp which was a lot more demanding.
Roosterphin said:Southern Rooster said:McSharkie said:Fittler isn't better than Lewis was. Fittler is third behind Daley. He is third behind Raper and Clyde at lock too.
How do you know. Lewis never came to Sydney to play week in week out against the best there was. Sure at Origin level and playing for Australia he was nothing short of great. I rate Brett Kenny as better than Wally. They played 12 times against each other in Origin and it was 8-4 NSW. Kenny won premierships with Parramatta. I have no doubt Wally was a great in QLD. But the question mark will always remain as to what would have happened had he had to play at that level every week.
My side which is an Australian side only.
Churchill
Grothe
Cronin
Brown
Dimond
Kenny
Johns
Raper
Coote
McCarthy
Lazarus
Krillich
Beetson
Res
Langlands
Messenger
Roach
Burge
Agree with Wally not coming to Sydney but he is still the only man to dominate SOO....no one else has come close. SOO is regarded as the highest level of footy so no doubt Lewis is the best.
Southern Rooster said:Roosterphin said:Southern Rooster said:McSharkie said:Fittler isn't better than Lewis was. Fittler is third behind Daley. He is third behind Raper and Clyde at lock too.
How do you know. Lewis never came to Sydney to play week in week out against the best there was. Sure at Origin level and playing for Australia he was nothing short of great. I rate Brett Kenny as better than Wally. They played 12 times against each other in Origin and it was 8-4 NSW. Kenny won premierships with Parramatta. I have no doubt Wally was a great in QLD. But the question mark will always remain as to what would have happened had he had to play at that level every week.
My side which is an Australian side only.
Churchill
Grothe
Cronin
Brown
Dimond
Kenny
Johns
Raper
Coote
McCarthy
Lazarus
Krillich
Beetson
Res
Langlands
Messenger
Roach
Burge
Agree with Wally not coming to Sydney but he is still the only man to dominate SOO....no one else has come close. SOO is regarded as the highest level of footy so no doubt Lewis is the best.
When defining the highest level of football it all deoends on what era you are talking about. In the 50's and 60's and even the 70's TEST football was the highest level.
There is doubt that he is the best. As there is no definitive answer and there never will be. When judging the best it is all down to video's opinion and stats. All we can do is offer reasons why we think one is better than the other. Doesn't mean they are necessarily though.
As for the QLD comp yes it was a high standard, but not as high as the NSWRL competition according to players who played in both.
but it wasn't at the same level as NSWRL at the time. I'm only repeating what 'experts' were saying at the time. The NSWRL was definately a much higher profile competition, and at the time, if I remember right, the sydney teams were playing in multiple 'cup' competitions at the same time.Roosterphin said:drake said:But that was the standard argument at the time, that the queensland based players did not have to contend with the rigours of the sydney based comp which was a lot more demanding.
Mate the Brisbane comp was also a pretty good standard
drake said:but it wasn't at the same level as NSWRL at the time. I'm only repeating what 'experts' were saying at the time. The NSWRL was definately a much higher profile competition, and at the time, if I remember right, the sydney teams were playing in multiple 'cup' competitions at the same time.Roosterphin said:drake said:But that was the standard argument at the time, that the queensland based players did not have to contend with the rigours of the sydney based comp which was a lot more demanding.
Mate the Brisbane comp was also a pretty good standard
Thus Sydney players would play an Origin game after having a much heavier work load than the QLD boys.