taipan said:Who is justifying it,of course there have been the odd blowouts in rugby when the Kangaroos played the Lions in the tri series in England?The point of the argument is we are talking about 2 recent union tests,Samoa and Fiji have gone backwards big time with cricket scores amassed against them with monotonous regularity.This with all the financial resources of the IRB and the fact that union has been the national codes of these countries for decades.
Obviously you dont listen to steady Eddie Jones(heard he coached the Wallabies) that this is not good for the game .
Who said it is good for rugby union? I was simply pointing out that blow-outs happen in league too, and it is surely also worth taking into consideration that tries are worth five points in rugby union when making comparisons.
It is hardly surprising that the fully professional nations like Australia, New Zealand, South Africa have benefitted greatly from our players being coached and trained full-time. We also have the advantage of having robust economies that can support a range of sports.
I know from first hand experience that Tonga, in particular, is a poor country, with most of its national income coming from overseas remittances. There is huge pressure on young men and women to emigrate to earn money for their families back home. A kid who can go to play rugby league or rugby union in Australia or New Zealand will do so. A similar situation applies, not to the same extent, in the other Pacific nations.
Some of the kids who go will still want to play for their nation, but will be at the mercy of their new employers as to whether they will be released.
A number of Fijian players were unavailable for the latest Test, apparently, for this and similar reasons.
The disparities are more due to the leading countries going ahead, rather than the popularity of rugby union decreasing. But, of course, ways have to be found to help the poorer countries improve their competitiveness.
Tonga beat Australia in 1973. Do you think that a similar result will ever happen in rugby league?
I recommend a good book for you"The Forbidden Game" just to keep you up to speed as to why rugby should be part of the name rugby league.When a govt(aka the French with a little prodding from union officialdom in 1946 ) bans rugby league from using the name rugby until the late 80s,thereby preventing govt grants ,preventing the game being taught in schools etc,and another reason for rugby league to fall into the doldrums in that country you may get the message,and it may sink in to a closed mind.
Mate,
I am sorry, I couldn't care less about this issue. If rugby league wants to bash its collective head against the wall, by continuing to confuse people with its name, that's okay by me.
I have simply pointed out the reality which is that, world-wide, "rugby" means rugby union. Believe it, or believe it not, that is a matter for you.