What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bird..... f**k!!!

coolumsharkie

Referee
Messages
27,212
I just saw on another website that he got 8 months jail.. Is this for real or what?

If it is it's a tad harsh.
 

Mr Angry

Not a Referee
Messages
51,816
It is real coolum.

Greg Bird jailed for 16 months
Harriet Alexander | June 22, 2009 - 11:39AM
Rugby league star Greg Bird will spend at least eight months in jail for hurting his girlfriend, Katie Milligan, with a broken glass.
Bird was immediately taken into custody at the Downing Local Court. He was visibly shaken and his supporters cried.
Magistrate Roger Clisdell sentenced Bird to a maximum of 16 months in prison for the attack on Ms Milligan.
"It was a despicable act and most un-Australian,'' he said in his sentencing remarks.
Earlier, Bird's girlfriend has written him a character reference to persuade a court to give him a lenient sentence for recklessly wounding her in an incident at his Cronulla apartment last August.
But his friend Brent Watson, who the former Sharks player originally told police was responsible for the cuts to Katie Milligan's face and eye, has described him as "selfish", the court heard today.
He has been found guilty of hurting Ms Milligan with a broken glass at his Cronulla apartment in August last year.
They had been arguing after she returned late from a night out.
The prosecution called for him to serve time in jail.
But Bird's lawyer, Les Nicholls, told the court that he had not hurt Ms Milligan intentionally and had not caused her lasting damage or disfigurement.
The pair now live together in France.
"I would ask your honour to accept the reference from the victim that at no time has Greg Bird ever intended ... to hurt her and it was out of character," Mr Nicholls said.
A good behaviour bond or community service order would be more appropriate, he said.
But the police prosecutor, Peter Stanhope, said Bird had not shown any concern for Mr Watson, whose reputation he was prepared to damage in an attempt to avoid police charges and the media attention they would bring.
Mr Watson had described Bird as "a selfish person whose only concern was his football career and the Sharks", Mr Stanhope said.
Mr Nicholls said Bird had been precluded from contacting Mr Watson since the incident, but he wished to apologise to him through the court.
"It was never his intention that any detriment be suffered by Mr Watson,'' Mr Nicholls said.
"He has not been in a position to offer his personal apology. He's asked me to do so today and to ask your Honour to take that into consideration for this offence."
The magistrate, Roger Clisdell, has reserved his decision on the sentence to this afternoon.
Bird was found guilty of reckless wounding and false accusation in April by the same magistrate, who said he had lied about how his girlfriend had turned up at hospital bleeding from her eye.
He pleaded guilty to public mischief.

http://www.smh.com.au/leaguehq/articles/2009/06/22/1245522769014.html
 

Mr Angry

Not a Referee
Messages
51,816
I am happy to see the correct aithorities deal with it.

Not his employer, or the employers franichor, not the media, but a court.
 
Messages
4,213
Harsh!!!??? He F*cked up Sharks chances in 2008 AND 2009. Throw away the key! Oh yeah ..And Not very nice behavior on his behalf to Girlfriend and Friend either,apparently.:crazy:
 

Ronnie Dobbs

Coach
Messages
17,800
I got no problems with people found guilty of glassing getting these type sentences.

However, what concerns me is that his profile may have counted against him here & the Courts have made an example of him. I know that probably 80% of glasssing cases either result in no defendent being apprehended, being thrown out of court or a suspended sentence. The fact the Courts have come down hard here is a good thing, but they must be morw stringent across the board.
 

Eion

First Grade
Messages
8,034
Mr Watson had described Bird as "a selfish person whose only concern was his football career and the Sharks", Mr Stanhope said.
I just found grounds for appeal. He never gave a rats ar$e about the sharks.
 

feeding frenzy

Juniors
Messages
942
I got no problems with people found guilty of glassing getting these type sentences.

However, what concerns me is that his profile may have counted against him here & the Courts have made an example of him. I know that probably 80% of glasssing cases either result in no defendent being apprehended, being thrown out of court or a suspended sentence. The fact the Courts have come down hard here is a good thing, but they must be morw stringent across the board.



well said 100% correct
 

gunnamatta bay

Referee
Messages
21,084
Bird's lawyer will apply for him to get bail this afternoon pending an appeal on the sentence.

http://www.smh.com.au/leaguehq/articles/2009/06/22/1245522769014.html

The use of the term 'glassing' still disturbs me. It infers a criminal intent to cause a serious injury with a drinking vessel similar to a beer type schooner the usual weapon of choice in pubs and clubs.

My impression was that an object, I think I recall the word 'vase', was thrown srtiking Milligan but without any real intent to harm her.
 

Latest posts

Top